Title: IceCube Physics, Design, Construction and First Results
1IceCube - Physics, Design,Construction and
First Results
Spencer Klein, LBNL
- Cosmic-rays and Neutrinos
- Neutrino Sources and Rates
- IceCube
- Conclusions
2- IAS, Princeton, USA
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
- University of Wisconsin-River Falls, USA
- LBNL, Berkeley, USA
- University of Kansas, USA
- Southern University and AM College, Baton
Rouge, USA
- Bartol Research Institute, Delaware, USA
- Pennsylvania State University, USA
- UC Berkeley, USA
- Clark-Atlanta University, USA
- Univ. of Maryland, USA
- University of Alaska, Anchorage, USA
USA (13)
Japan
Europe (13)
- Chiba University, Japan
- University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ
New Zealand
- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
- Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium
- Universität Mainz, Germany
- DESY-Zeuthen, Germany
- Universität Dortmund, Germany
- Humboldt University, Germany
ANTARCTICA
- Universität Wuppertal, Germany
- Uppsala university, Sweden
- Stockholm university, Sweden
- Imperial College, London, UK
- Oxford university, UK
- Utrecht,university, Netherlands
3then
Mysterious radiation from space
4An Air Shower in the Pierre Auger Observatory
and now
Co
Radius (m)
3.6 m
SLAC to scale)
5Cosmic Rays An Unsolved Problem
- 13 decades in energy
- Seen up to 31020 eV
- 48 Watt-sec
- Above 10161 eV, origin and composition are
mysteries - Extra-galactic?
- Many, many theory papers
108 eV
1021 eV
6Cosmic Rays in the Galaxy
- Galactic Sources
- Supernova remnant accelerators may reach 10161
eV - Supernova produce a large nuclear component
- Leaky Box Model
- High energy CR diffuse out of galaxy
- At fixed energy, nuclei are confined better than
protons - ltAgt increases with energy
- By default, higher energy CR are extra-galactic
- Mostly protons?
106
108
E (GeV)
7Composition
Iron
- Satellites or balloons data lt 1015 eV
- Energy reach limited by detector size
- Indirect Determination is difficult
- Ground based detectors
- Leakage through a 30L calorimeter
- Shower shape, m content
- Fluorescence Arrays
- Depth of Shower Maximum
- Sensitive to hadronic interaction models
- Composition varies with energy
- Ion fraction increases up to 1015 eV, may
decrease above 1018 eV
Proton
AMANDA ( of m)
log(E/PeV)
Spase ( of e)
Flys Eye
Depth of Xmax (g/cm2)
Log E (EeV)
8Cosmic Ray Propagation in the Galaxy
- Ions bend in the Galaxy's magnetic field
- Q B/ZE
- Below 1019 eV, cosmic rays do not point to their
source - At higher energies, it depends on the simulation
parameters, especially the assumed B field - Most studies of EHE cosmic rays find no
clustering
9Cosmic Ray Interactions
- p g3K --gt D --gt np
- CR range lt 50 megaparsecs _at_ 1020 eV
- GZK cutoff
- Egt1020 eV sources must be near
- Cutoff present in HiRes data
- Not seen by AGASA
- Auger seems to support HiRes
- p? decay guaranteed source of EHE neutrinos
- Also p g3oK,IR starlight --gt pee-
- Heavier ions are destroyed by photodisintegration
- Similar (or worse) range limits
Absorption 1/E dE/dt (ly-1)
Log10(Energy)
Michael Kachelrieß, 2004
10Source Characteristics
- Passage through a shock wave can accelerate
charged particles via Fermi Acceleration - Fractional energy gain per passage z lt 1
- Circular accelerator
- Typical time scale 250 passes 1,000 years
- Magnetic confinement allows repeated passes
- Emax (eV) 2 104 B(Gauss)L(m) (Z)
- Relativistic jets can have similar accelerating
qualities in a single pass - Power law spectrum dN/dE 1/E2
- Predicted by many studies, models
11Some Possible Sources
Michael Kachelrieß, 2004
12Supernovae Remnants
- Neutron star in the center powers system
- B field, gravitation, accretion
- Photons observed from Crab nebula with E 10 TeV
- Consistent with synchrotron radiation inverse
Compton scattering - Magnetic field matter/shock front distribution
allow acceleration to 1015-17eV/A - Popular galactic source
- Lots of nuclei present
13Active Galactic Nuclei
- Galaxy with a supermassive black hole at center
- Emits a narrow jet of relativistic particles
- Jet-matter interactions produce n g
- Markarian 501 seen from radio waves to 10 TeV
- Spectrum indicates probably not electromagnetic
acceleration - Similar spectra seen from galactic center
VLA image of Cygnus A
14Direct Production?
- Decays of superheavy particles produce high
energy protons, photons and n - Magnetic monopoles
- X particles
- topological defects
- etc.
- Annihilation of heavy/superheavy big-bang relics
15Neutrinos probe CR sources
- Photons are absorbed by matter at the source and
interact with cosmic microwave photons in transit - Charged cosmic ray are bent in transit
- n come straight to us
- Cross sections are small
- A large detector is needed
16Neutrino Production
- Cosmic-ray acceleration occurs in low-density
matter - beam-gas interactions
- Produced p and K decay before they can interact
- p ? ,K ? --gt mnm, m--gt enenm
- n vs n-bar difference c, b --gt lnX often
neglected - Two approaches to calculate n flux
- Source density known CR spectrum set number of
n-producing interactions - n come from ions that dont escape the source
could be more numerous than those that do - Maximum n energy is a few of ion energy
- Assume photon production from p0--gtgg
- N(p0 ) N(p ) p decay chain emits n
- Avoids uncertainty due to CR composition
17Cosmic Ray Composition n Flux
- Ion acceleration as protons, but Emax is Z times
higher - Ions dissociate into lighter ions, p, n, etc.
when they interact - Toy model nucleus A --gt A excited nucleons
- A times as many n, but with energy E/A
- Large reduction in HE n flux
- Nuclear b decay also contributes
18n production in AGNs
Frejus Limit
- Scale TeV photon data to estimate n spectra
- Estimate g absorption
- n attenuation in earth
- Assume g come from p0
- Total of 1,000 upward nm/year from all AGNs
- with En gt 1 TeV
- Diffuse Flux
- Are individual AGNs visible?
Flux
En (GeV)
R. Gandhi, C. Quigg, M Reno and I. Sarcevic, 1996
19 production in gamma-ray bursters
- Burst of gs with energies up to at least 10 GeV
- Durations from seconds to minutes
- Allows nearly background-free searches
- Colliding compact objects (e.g. neutron
stars/black holes) - Short duration (lt2 s)
- hypernova collapse of a supermassive star
- Long duration (gt2 s)
- Theory predicts g and n emission up to very high
energies - Estimate rate on a burst-by-burst basis using
measured burst characteristics - Best search sensitivity by focusing on biggest
bursts - IceCube should see 1-2 n from the these bursts
GRB000131
(modulo some recently seen bursts)
20Measuring snN by neutrino absorption in the earth
- The earth becomes opaque to neutrinos with
energies gt 200 TeV - n Angular distributions are known
- Measure cross section by studying n flux as
f(zenith angle, energy) - Usable up to En few PeV
- Maximum energy depends on poorly known n flux
on detector acceptance near horizon - Absorption snN
- Sensitive to weak charge (quarks) to
x few 10-4
Absorber thickness Depends on zenith angle
fraction
xmin
J. Jalilian-Marian, 2004
21Strategies for Extra-terrestrial Neutrino
Searches
- nm Point Sources
- Diffuse Searches
- Most sensitive if there are many sources
- p,K decay produces nm, ne 21
- Oscillations change this to 111 nenmnt for
distant sources - Muon energy loss alters ratio at high energy
- ne
- Good energy resolution, poor angular resolution
- nm
- Good angular resolution, poor energy resolution
- Atmospheric neutrino background
- nt
- Very low background
- Triggered (e.g. GRB) untriggered burst searches
22nm interactions
- Good directional information
- Background from atmospheric n
- m lose energy by bremsstrahlung, direct pair
production photonuclear interactions - dE/dx E for Egt 1 TeV
- Range depends on energy
- 1 TeV --gt 1 km in ice
- 1 PeV --gt 20 km range
- Effective area is much larger than detector volume
Eµ10 TeV, 90 hits
Measure range /or dE/dx to get energy
Eµ6 PeV, 1000 hits
23ne interactions Electromagnetic Showers
- Shower length 10 m --gt good energy resolution
- Bloblike --gt poor directional determination
- Peak in cross section for ne gtW --gt ln,
hadrons - Glashow Resonance
- Techniques are much less developed than for nm
Gandhi, Quigg, Reno Sarcevic, 1996
24nt interactions
- ntN --gt tX
- gbct 500 m at E1016 eV
- Double-bang signature
- 1 shower when the t is produced
- 2nd shower when the t decays
- A minimum ionizing track connects the showers
Learned and Pakvasa, 1994
Et few PeV
25AMANDA Point source analysis
Optimal search window
2000-2004 4282 events 1001 days live-time
- Search for an excess of events
- from candidate sources
- anywhere on the northern sky
- Atm-n Background from off-source data
- No detection yet, flux upper limits set
26Atmospheric Neutrinos Diffuse nm searches
- Air showers produce n via p,K decays
- Mostly nm
- p,K Decay probability decreases with energy as
gbct rises - dNn/dE E-3.7
- Steeper than extra-terrestrial sources
(typically E-2) - High energies better for extra-terrestrial
searches - AMANDA set limits on E-2 spectrum
- E2??µ(E) lt 2.6107 GeV/ cm2 s sr
- For 100 TeV lt E lt 300 TeV
E-2 Limit
27Other Physics
- Supernova monitor
- Count total photoelectrons in all PMTs
- Dark Matter
- n from weakly interacting massive particles
annihilation in the center of the earth or the
sun - Supersymmetry
- Pairs of upward going charged sparticles
- Separation 100 m
- Fast magnetic monopoles other exotica
Sol
28Detector Basics
- Need 1 km3 detector to see extraterrestrial
signals - Only natural media are affordable
- Cherenkov radiation from charged particles
- Sparse sampling optical detectors
- Water
- Homogenous ()
- Long scattering Length ()
- Relatively short absorption length (-)
- 40K bioluminescence background in seawater (-)
- Ocean currents (-)
- Pursued by DUMAND (1980s), BAIKAL, NESTOR,
ANTARES NEMO - European Km3 initiative in Mediterranean
NESTOR
ANTARES
29Ice Detectors
- Pioneered by AMANDA (1992)
- Observed atmospheric nm
- Learned many lessons
- Ice is inhomogenous
- Air bubbles _at_ lt 1,000 m deep
- Dust layers cause scattering
- Ice has a long absorption length
- But scattering is significant
- Cold Dark --gt Low Noise rates (lt 1 kHz)
- Transmission to surface nontrivial
A m in AMANDA
30IceCube
- 1 km3 neutrino observatory
- 4800 optical modules
- 10 phototube in a 13 sphere
- 80 strings with 60 modules
- 125 m hexagonal grid
- 1400 to 2400 m deep
- 160 station - 1 km2 surface array
- 242M NSF Major Research Equipment initiative
- 25M foreign contributions
- Transportation to the pole is expensive!
31IceCube
Skiway
IceCube
South Pole Station
2005/6Drill Site
Counting House
AMANDA
South Pole
32IceCube drill camp
5 MW hot water heater (car-wash technology)
33Hose reel
5 Megawatt Hot water generator
IceTop tanks
Hot-water drilling
34Hole Drilling
- 2500 m deep, 60 cm dia. holes
- 5 Megawatt hot water drill
- Mostly reliable operation
- Single heater, hose, two towers
- Set up one, drill with the other
- Speeds to 2.2 m/minute
- 40 hours to drill a hole
- 2004/5 1 string
- 2005/6 8 strings
- 2006/7 13 strings
AMANDA
IceCube
Depth vs. Time
35Deployment
- Attach DOMs to cable, lower away
- 12 hours/string
- Special Devices (1/string each)
- Dust Logger
- Standard Candle N2 laser
- BubbleCam
- Acoustic/Radio tests
36(No Transcript)
37Dust Logger
- Measures Ice Optical properties
- Emits light perpendicular to hole
- Measures light scattered by dust
- Dust is due to volcanoes (narrow lines) weather
over last 200,000 years - Are the dust layers constant horizontal across
IceCube?
38IceTop Surface Array
- 160 Detectors in 1 km2
- Energy to 1019 eV
- Ice filled tanks
- Cosmic Ray Composition
- Surface particles subsurface m
- High pT muons in CR air showers
- pQCD based composition studies
- Calibrate IceCube
- Veto downgoing cosmic rays
- g detector (w/ IceCube as a veto)
39IceTop
- Detects e, g from air showers
- 320 TeV threshold
- 2 water tanks near each string
- 1.8 m diameter
- Controlled freeze to minimize bubbles
- 2 DOMs
402 IceTop Tanks ( 1 station)
m signals from IceTop DOMs
41Optical Modules
- Each optical module collects data autonomously
- 10 Photomultiplier w/ HV
- 300 MHz waveform digitizer
- Custom analog chip
- 40 MHz fast ADC
- Self triggering
- 1/4 photoelectron threshold
- lt5 Watts of power
- 700 Hz Dark rate
- 350 Hz w/ 51 ms deadtime
- LEDs for calibration
- Packetized Digital data sent to surface
42Digital Optical Module Mainboard
300kgate FPGA w/ ARM 7 CPU
Crystal oscillator Allen Variance lt 510-11
Custom Switched Capacitor Array 128 sample 300
MSPS 2/board
43Data Acquisition
- Goal Detect every photoelectron
- Record waveforms from non-isolated hits
- 400 nsec _at_ 300 MSPS
- 14 bit dynamic range
- 3 10-bit channels
- 6.4 msec _at_ 25 MSPS
- 10 bit dynamic range
- Time Stamp isolated hits
- Trigger on multiplicity, topology
- Frame (Event) All hits in a given time window
- Commercial electronics on surface
ATWD1
ATWD0
fADC
ATWD2
44Reconstruction Performance
- Timing Calibrations
- Reconstruction Methods
- Neutrino Events
- Atmospheric neutrino analysis
45Time Calibration
Time
46Optical properties of the ice
Scattering
Absorption
bubbles
ice
dust
dust
Measurements in-situ light sources atmospheric
muons Dust Logger
optical WATER parameters labs 50 m _at_ 400
nm lsca 200 m _at_ 400 nm
Average optical ice parameters labs 110 m _at_
400 nm lsca 20 m _at_ 400 nm
47Particle (m) Tracking
- m tracks lose energy by emitting g, ee- pairs
and hadronic interactions (via virtual g) - Charged particles emit Cherenkov radiation
- angle q Cos-1(1/n) 410
- The photons scatter (L 25 m)
- Some (lt10-6) photons are observed in
photodetectors - We measure points 0-50 meters from the m track
- Tracking is very hard we do not have the
optimal solution - Angular resolution lt 10
m
Noise
48Neutrinos Observed
Time residuals from fit Direct scatted photons
A 2005 Neutrino candidate 49 DOMs hit in String
21
2006 Neutrino candidate 24 DOMs hit in 2 strings
49A high-multiplicity event
Time residuals vs. depth
50Atmospheric Neutrinos
- 90 days of data with 9 strings
- Starting June 3, 2006
- 156 events observed
- 144 12 48 events expected
- 138 atmospheric nm
- 4.4 single cosmic-ray m
- 2.3 overlapping cosmic-ray m
- 2 independent showers at the same time
- n rate will increase with larger detector,
slightly more efficient data taking and optimized
tracking selection criteria - Expect 100,000 atmospheric n/year with full
detector
51Multi-parameter measurementwith IceCube/IceTop
Cosmic Ray
- IceTop measures air shower energy, direction
core position - InIce measures
- Muon energy, by dE/dx
- Muon bundles near shower core
- Muon pT, by distance from core
- (away from core region)
- pT Emcore_distance/production_height
- Perform standard (collider-like) pQCD studies
- Sensitive to cosmic-ray composition
N2
25 km
e,g
m From c,b
m from p,K
S. Klein, astro-ph/0612051
52Logistics home base
The New
The Old
53Getting there is half the fun
Logistics Transportation
New C-17
Old C-141
54Logistics Transportation
55Conclusions
- UHE Cosmic Rays are one of the great unsolved
problems in physics - Direct source searches are hampered by
interstellar magnetic fields - Studies of extraterrestrial n will shed light on
the origin and composition of UHE cosmic rays. - IceCube construction is well underway.
- We have deployed 22 out of 70-80 strings.
- Construction is scheduled for completion in 2011.
- The hardware is working well.
- We have seen our first neutrinos
- First physics results are coming out.
56Backups, etc.
57DOM Occupancyprobability a DOM is hit in events
that have gt7 hits on a string
- Features in DOM
- occupancy are
- affected by ice
- properties
- (scattering,
- absorption)
58Timing Stability
Long tail from scattered light
- Select muon tracks that pass near target DOM
- Nearby --gt unscattered light
- Find mean of residual
- Compare data from June, 2005 Sept. 2005
Dusty Ice
59How many sources?Do cosmic rays cluster?
E gt 1020 eV 4 1019 eV lt E lt 1020 eV
Multiplets
- No obvious connection between cosmic rays and
interesting directions. - Clustering?
- Most analyses indicate no
60Neutrino Production fromNuclear propagation
- For ions, photodissociation replaces D production
- Breaks nucleus up into lighter ions, protons,
neutrons. - Neutrons and fragments can b decay
- ne, but with quite low energies
- Since sn En, signal drops quickly as A rises
- Very little signal for Agt4
b decay
m decay
Hydrogen Helium Oxygen Iron
Hooper, Taylor and Sarkar, 2004
61WIMP searches
Disfavored by direct search (CDMS II)
62Search for steady point sources
Search cone 1? opening half-angle soft energy
cut (lt 1 TeV)
Sensitivity point sources (1 y) 5.5?10-9 E-2
(cm-2s-1GeV)
63Angres
Angular resolution as a function of zenith angle
Waveform information not used. Will
improve resolution for high energies !
0.8 0.6
- above 1 TeV, resolution 0.6 - 0.8 degrees for
most zenith angles
64Supernova Monitor
Amanda-II
AMANDA II 95 of Galaxy IceCube Milky Way
LMC msec time resolution
You are here
LMC
IceCube
65Effective Area of IceCube
Effective area vs. zenith angle after rejection
of background from downgoing atmospheric muons
- Effective area vs. muon energy
- - after trigger
- - after rejection of atm ?
- after cuts to get the ultimate
- sensitivity for point sources
- (optimized for 2 benchmark spectra)
66Transient point sources e.g. GRB
Essentially background-free search spatial and
temporal correlation with independent
observation !
- For 1000 GRBs observed/year
- expect (looking in Northern sky only)
- signal 12 ? (Waxmann/Bahcall model)
- background (atm ) 0.1 ?
-
Sensitivity GRB (1 y) 0.2 ?WB
Excellent prospects for detection of GRB ?s
within 1 year (if WB model realistic)
t01h
Waxman/Bahcall 99
67Search for diffuse excess of extra-terrestrial
high energy neutrinos
log E? /GeV
68IceTop surface array
- 160 Detectors in 1 km2
- Energy to 1019 ev
- Tank of ice with 2 OMs frozen in them
- Cosmic Ray Composition
- Surface particles subsurface m
- High pT muons in CR air showers
- pQCD based composition studies
- Calibrate IceCube
- Veto downgoing cosmic rays
- g detector (w/ IceCube as a veto)
69Neutrino Production frompropagating protons
- Guaranteed (albeit small) source
- p g (30K) --gt D --gt np
- p --gt mnm, m--gt enenm
- En/Einitial p 1
- Few events/year
- 0.2/km3 target volume /year
- Engel, Seckel and Stanev, 2001
- 2/km3 target volume/year
- Hooper, Taylor and Sarkar, 2004
- GZK neutrinos