David Waters - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

David Waters

Description:

David Waters – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: davidw122
Category:
Tags: bwq | david | waters

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: David Waters


1
Neutrino Astronomy General Overview Future
Prospects
David Waters University College London
Thanks Amy Connolly, Subir Sarkar
APP UK Conference, Oxford, 19th June 2008
2
Outline
  • Why Neutrino Astronomy ?
  • Potential Sources of High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos
  • Detection Techniques
  • Some Pioneering Experiments
  • Where Next ?

3
Truth in Advertising
  • Only two extra-terrestrial neutrino sources have
    ever been observed

SN1987A
Solar-? Image (Super-K)
  • Both had a profound impact on astroparticle
    physics.
  • Neutrino astronomy awaits its true first-light.
    All you will see here are limits.
  • But, there is very good reason to think we are
    getting close

4
Particle Physics at Extreme Energies
Centre of Mass Energy (GeV)
Cosmic-Ray Spectrum Credit R. Engel
  • Cosmic rays probe particle physics at ECM gtgt
    ELHC.
  • Even simple observables (e.g. ?tot) can be used
    to search for new physics.
  • Neutrinos could provide a particularly clean
    probe compared to hadrons.

5
Multi-Messenger Astronomy
6
Astrophysical Neutrino Sources
  • What fluxes from astrophysical sources can be
    expected in general ?

Fraction of CR primary energy converted to
neutrinos
From rate of UHE CR's (1019-1021 eV)
Hubble time
  • Many qualifications and caveats.
  • Can be evaded if
  • sources are optically thick
  • neutrinos from other sources (top-down)

7
Cosmogenic Neutrinos
GZK mechanism
ETHRESH. 6 ? 1019 eV
  • Uncertainties in flux calculations
  • UHECR luminosity ?CR(local) ? lt?CRgt
  • injection spectrum
  • cosmological evolution of sources
  • IRB optical density of sources

8
Cosmogenic Neutrinos
  • Caveats
  • Does the primary cosmic ray spectrum show
    evidence of the GZK cut-off ?
  • Perhaps the UHECR sources themselves cut-off
    around the GZK energy cosmic conspiracy. Most
    assume a cut-off substantially higher 1021-1022
    eV (Hillas).
  • Composition of the primary cosmic rays ?

9
Connections with other Fields
  • Astrophysics
  • ?-Ray Astronomy
  • Highest Energy CR's

n-Astronomy
10
Cosmic Ray Neutrino Detection Methods
?
incoming neutrino
11
Target Media
  • Targets
  • Ice
  • Water
  • Atmosphere
  • Salt
  • Lunar regolith

12
Target Media
13
Optical Cerenkov
  • Similar to detection techniques used in
    low-energy experiments (Super-K).
  • The only technique with a proven capacity to
    detect (atmospheric) neutrinos.
  • Backgrounds CR muons (downward) atmospheric
    neutrinos (upward).
  • Muon tracking
  • Effective volume gtgt instrumented volume (_at_ E such
    that R? gtgt Sdetector)
  • Excellent pointing accuracy.
  • Relatively poor energy resolution.
  • Cascade detection
  • Effective volume instrumented volume.
  • Poor pointing accuracy.
  • Relatively good energy resolution.

14
Optical Cerenkov
figure of merit for cascade detection
  • Detector capabilities vary but broadly comparable
    between ice water
  • Energy thresholds ranges
  • Pointing resolutions
  • Deployment operational difficulties

15
Amanda-II
USA, Germany, Sweden, Belgium, Venezuela
South Pole
AMANDA
  • Amanda II (2000)
  • 19 strings
  • 677 optical modules
  • 400 m high
  • 200 m wide
  • VEFF O(0.01) km3 (cascades)
  • 8 PMT's

16
Amanda-II Physics Results
Point Source Search (2004) 607 days, median-E? ?
1.3 TeV No point sources identified
Diffuse Flux Search (2007) Consistent with
atmospheric-?s No evidence for cosmic diffuse
flux
  • Plus many others
  • Terrestrial WIMP searches.
  • Atmospheric neutrino flux measurements out to
    high energies.
  • Cosmic ray composition studies (in conjunction
    with surface arrays).
  • Supernova watch.

17
Ice Cube
USA, Germany, Sweden, Belgium, UK (Oxford), New
Zealand, The Netherlands, Venezuela
  • Need a bigger detector
  • 1 km3 volume 70 ? Amanda II
  • 70 strings 1500-2500m deep 160 tanks (IceTop)
  • 40 strings 80 tanks already deployed
  • Construction to be completed in 2011

18
Underwater Detectors
Deep Med. Sites
ANTARES
NEMO
NESTOR
19
ANTARES
  • Antares
  • All 12 physics lines installed.
  • 1 instrumentation line (environmental sensors,
    beacons, cameras, hydrophones)
  • 0.1 km2 surface area.
  • Significant UK input, e.g. optical beacons.

Feb-May 2007
  • Clear signal for upwards going muons neutrino
    candidates.
  • Data collection and analysis in progress.

20
KM3Net
  • EU ESFRI roadmap project.
  • 40 institutions from 10 European countries
  • UK Aberdeen, Leeds, Liverpool, Sheffield.
  • 3 year, 20M design study for a km3 detector in
    the Mediterranean.
  • Broad scope physics studies, detector design
    and site investigations.
  • Conceptual Design Report delivered in April 2008
    TDR by end of 2008.
  • Competitive with and complementary to IceCube.

LED beacon development - building on Antares
work. (Sheffield)
Fast simulation for detector configuration
studies (Liverpool)
Physics studies - building on data analysis
experience (Leeds)
21
UHE GZK Neutrinos
  • How big does our detector need to be to see the
    GZK neutrino flux ?

Flux 5 GZK neutrinos / km2 / yr in 2?
Interaction length 300 km _at_ 1018 eV
To detect 10 GZK neutrinos per year, we need to
have a sensitive volume of 100s km3.
22
Extensive Air Shower
Pierre Auger Observatory ? Johannes
  • Neutrinos at Auger
  • Distinguish late (?) from early (h) showers for a
    given atmospheric depth using
  • timing information
  • pulse shape information
  • Detect ?-decay showers from Earth-skimming
    neutrinos

??
In 1 full-array-year of data, Auger find no such
events and place a very competitive limit. See
summary.
New ! 2007/8
23
Radio Emission Principle
  • First described by Askaryan (1961).
  • Expected 20 net negative co-moving charge
    excess (Zmacro) in UHE shower development due to
  • Ionisation ? e- ? ?? e-
  • Annihilation e e- ? ?
  • Cerenkov radiation from Zmacro for v gt clocal .
  • Radiation is coherent for

? gt Dshower O(10) cm
f 100 MHz few GHz
  • Target requirements
  • radio transparent
  • instrumentable
  • quiet
  • Candidates
  • ice
  • dry salt
  • sand / lunar regolith

24
Radio Emission Proof of Principle
  • Demonstrated for
  • sand
  • salt
  • ice

COHERENCE
Target
25
Pioneering Radio Experiments
FORTE (97-99)
RICE (99-present)
GLUE (99)
  • Antenna array in south-polar ice.
  • Sensitive in range 0.2-1 GHz
  • Threshold 1016 eV
  • Radio telescope.
  • Target lunar regolith (moon-skimming neutrinos)
  • High threshold 1011 GeV
  • Satellite radio antenna
  • Target Greenland ice sheet
  • Very high threshold 1013 GeV

26
Radio Ice Cerenkov Experiment
USA
  • 20 dipole receivers in South Polar ice.
  • Scattered within 200m ? 200m ? 200m cube.
  • Threshold 1016 eV
  • Effective volume 1 km3 _at_ 1018 eV
  • Anthropogenic noise reduction through event
    reconstruction.
  • Refractive effects measured in situ.
  • Attenuation length gt array size.
  • Sets competitive limits at GZK energies.

effective volume
27
ANtarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna
USA, UK (UCL)
Solar Panels
M. Rosen, Univ. of Hawaii
ANITA Gondola Payload
Antenna array
Cover (partially cut away)
28
Acoustic Emission Principle
Mechanism first described by Askaryan (1957)
Hydrodynamical emission of tracks of ionising
particles in stable liquids.
fast thermal energy deposition
slow heat diffusion
Temperature or Volume
D
Time (arbitrary units)
?t
h
h
(10-20 kHz for water)
coefficient of thermal expansivity
specific heat capacity
29
Acoustic Emission Proof of Principle
More recent work (Erlangen, Zeuthen) has
confirmed this picture for both water and
ice-targets
30
Study of Acoustic UHE Neutrino Detection
USA
  • 7 hydrophones in a larger US navy array
    instrumented with 180 kHz ADC's.
  • Warm water expansive but noisy.

SIGNAL ?
BIO easy to reject ?
Need well calibrated phase response
31
Study of Acoustic UHE Neutrino Detection
USA
  • Multi-phone coincidence requirements and fiducial
    volume cuts remove the remaining multi-polar
    background.

Detection contours log10E (GeV) 11-16
195 days livetime
  • Thresholds too high small effective volumes at
    GZK energies.
  • Fundamental limits (hydrophone sensitivity, noise
    floors) not yet reached.
  • A lot of scope for
  • finding quieter ocean volumes
  • optimal hydrophone arrangement
  • far larger hydrophone arrays

32
IceRay
  • Embedded detectors have lower energy thresholds,
    better for GZK (cf. RICE)
  • Co-detection in different modes will provide the
    definitive signature of UHE-?s.
  • Ice is the only medium feasible for all three
    optical, radio and acoustic.
  • Radio antennae could be on surface or at depth.
  • A small array of 18-36 stations could be
    operational by 2012 and would detect 4-8 GZK
    neutrinos/year.
  • A larger array could feasibly detect O(100) GZK
    neutrinos/year ? physics astronomy !

33
Summary of Results
34
Conclusions/Roadmap
What might happen next ?
IceCube starts to see ?-sources
ANITA/AUGER see first GZK ?s
PeV energy ?-astronomy
Ultra-high energy ?-astronomy
physics, sources etc.
detection techniques (optical, acoustic)
Build KM3
Build IceRay
  • After decades of steady progress, there is an
    excellent chance that neutrino astronomy will see
    its first light in the next few years.
  • This is an exciting time - join us !

35
The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com