Title: La Politique du tout PC au CERN
1La Politique du tout PC au CERN
Séminaire EDF Clamart 15 décembre 2000 Les
Robertson CERN/IT Genève
2Sommaire
- Le problème
- La stratégie
- Les difficultés
3Le problème
4Architectures operating systems supported at
end 1999
Digital Unix
SPARC
Solaris
MIPS
AIX
The legacy of ten years of RISC computing
Alpha
Windows 2000
Irix
Windows 95
Windows NT
Linux
Power PC
MAC-OS
Intel IA-32
PA-RISC
HP-UX
5- Combien darchitectures et systèmes
dexploitation sont vraiment nécessaire? - Combien coûte le support?
- Combien vaut la diversité?
- Comment imposer des limitations de choix dans un
environnement de recherche scientifique ?
6 LOrganisation Européenne
pour la Recherche Nucléaire 20 pays
européens 2,700 employées 6,000
utilisateurs
7The Large Hadron Collider - LHC
- LHC accelerator under construction
- Proton-proton collider
- 27 km of super-conducting magnets
- Target date for first beams - 2005
- Four experiments
- Example - CMS
- 2000 physicists, 150 universities
8The LHC Detectors
CMS
ATLAS
3.5 PetaBytes / year 108 events/year
LHCb
9HEP Computing Characteristics
- Large numbers of independent events
- trivial parallelism
- Large data sets
- smallish records
- mostly read-only
- Modest I/O rates
- few MB/sec per fast processor
- Modest floating point requirement
- SPECint performance
- ? High Througput Computing
- Very large aggregate requirements computation,
data - Scaling up is not just big it is also complex
- and once you exceed the capabilities of a single
geographical installation ?
10Generic computing farm
network servers
application servers
tape servers
les.robertson_at_cern.ch
disk servers
Cern/it/pdp-les.robertson 10-98-10
1110-20K cpus?
Non-LHC
10K SI951200 processors
LHC
Moores Law estimate of the capacity for fixed
level of investment, fixed number of processors
12Generic computing farm
network servers
application servers
LHC physics facility 4 experiments 2 M
SPECint95 10-20K processors 2 PByte disk gt20 K
disks
tape servers
les.robertson_at_cern.ch
disk servers
Cern/it/pdp-les.robertson 10-98-12
13Summary of the problem
- HEP is using far too many operating systems
- in many cases with only slightly different
functionality or hardware cost benefits - and at a high cost for users and support teams
- The scale of LHC computing -
- massive numbers of processors/boxes
- integration of regional computing centres and
CERN - ? problem is how to manage on this scale
while limiting costs of equipment, management
support - We must reduce the diversity
- while retaining flexibility
- to use low-cost, mass market components
- and adapt rapidly to changing physics needs
14La stratégie
15Opportunity
- PCs Linux Windows offer an historic
opportunity to reduce the solution set - Costs and performance
- PCs will consistently be among the very best
price/performers for HEP codes - They may not be the fastest,but they are fast
enough - Linux -a non-proprietary operating system
compatible with the recent Unix history - Windows a mass market alternative widely used
on the desktop
16Policy
- Restrict ourselves to PC hardware with Linux
or Windows 2000 - Develop a migration plan -
- progressively freeze support for other
Unixes,announcing end-dates which are
reasonable for old experiments, - strongly discourage further investments in RISC
systems by current and future experiments - install large Linux public facility, testbed for
future experiments - Concentrate investment in Linux and Windows
- bring support up to the standards of proprietary
Unixes - tackle the problems of scaling the management and
performance of physics farms and desktops - seek HEP-wide consensus
17But do not be unrealistic ----
- This is a convergence policy
- which looks realistic now
- and will provide a single starting point for LHC
computing - but we can be sure that the industry will not
stand still, and we shall sooner or later have to
expand the systems and architectures supported
Digital Unix
SPARC
AIX
MAC-OS
WNT
Solaris
Alpha
Linux
Irix
Intel IA-32
Intel IA-64
- - - ?
Windows 2000
MIPS
Power PC
Windows 95
Linux
HP-UX
PA-RISC
18Les difficultés et l'état de la migration
19Difficulties - I
- Physics (almost) entirely Unix based
- Linux is not quite ready
- (Too) wide a choice of kernels, compilers,
debuggers - Different versions supported by different
applications - Some applications not supported on Linux
- Complex packages (Oracle, AFS) better go with
the standard platform - Stability problems under load
- Who provides in-depth, on-site Linux systems
support? - Solution
- Standard Linux Package certified for all CERN
applications - Solaris/SPARC for special purposes
- Open posts for Linux experts
20Difficulties - II
- In a research environment
- Easy to estimate the costs of systems support
- Hard to estimate the cost of application
migration - The application experts have already moved on
- The developers have other (more interesting)
problems to solve - The problem is not only to port the code
- but (more important) to acquire confidence in the
physics results - Compiler, architecture, old bugs
- But there are signs that LinuxIntel are as good
as any! - In the past, the production use of multiple
architectures was an important factor in finding
bugs
21Current Status Physics
- For older experiments
- Strong resistance to aggressive migration
proposal - Agreement for complete freeze on all proprietary
Unixes during 2003 - For future experiments (not yet collecting data)
- General agreement on Linux/Intel for
production,but require a second (limited)
development platform for validation - For new experiments collecting data now
- Easy to calculate the benefits
- Have already completed migration
22Current Status other applications
- Desktop applications
- Web, Office, .
- Windows 2000
- Engineering applications
- Aggressive migration plan to Windows NT/2000
Linux, with some residual SUN - Major exception is mechanical CAE (Euclid
Digital Unix) - Administration
- Database (Oracle) on SUN
- Clients Web-based (Outlook/Netscape)
- Strong pockets of MAC resistance led by the
Directorate
23Conclusions
- Les besoins énormes du LHC exigent la
standardisation et lutilisation des composants
bon-marché - Opportunité Linux Windows 2000 avec Intel
IA32/64 Ethernet - Grande inertie (résistance?) de la part des
vielles expériences - il faudra 4 années
pour terminer la migration - Mais déjà plus de trois quarts des
systèmes installés et 90 de la capacité
sont Linux/Intel