Title: Economics and the Management of Ocean Fisheries
1Economics and the Management of Ocean Fisheries
- Gordon Munro
- Department of Economics and Fisheries Centre
- University of British Columbia
- Vancouver, Canada
2Introduction
- Worlds ocean fisheries are divided between
- capture fisheries hunting fish in the wild
- aquaculture fish farming
- While aquaculture is steadily growing in
importance, we shall confine ourselves to capture
fisheries - capture fisheries pose a far greater management
problem than does aquaculture
3Importance of Ocean Capture Fisheries
- Although ocean capture fishery resources have
been subject to overexploitation, these fisheries
have annual harvests equal 80 million tonnes,
with first sale value of roughly US 70 billion - Provide direct, and indirect employment to as
many as 200 million - particularly important to the developing world
4Developments in Ocean Capture Fisheries
- There is clear evidence that ocean capture
fishery harvests are reaching a plateau - only increase through improved management
- That is not alarming what is alarming is
evidence increasing overexploitation - FAO criterion is stock at level capable of
Maximum Sustained Yield (MSY)? - (i) Stock at MSY level Fully Exploited
- (ii) Stock above MSY level Less than Fully
Exploited - (iii) Stock below MSY level - Overexploited
5Growing Overexploitation
- According to the FAO, in 1950 no more than 5 of
capture fishery stocks overexploited by the
early 2000s, this figure had jumped to 25. A
further 50 are in the Fully Exploited category - Fully Exploited is not Overexploited, but fear
that many Fully Exploited stocks are candidates
for Overexploited category (but see later) - Recent work by Daniel Pauly (co-winner, 2006
Volvo Foundation Prize) and R. Froese (2003)
implies that FAO may be understating the problem
6Global trend in the status of marine fisheries
resources based on FAO statistics(Daniel Pauly
and R. Froese, 2003)
100
Collapsed
80
Overfished
Relative status ()
Fully exploited
60
Developing
40
Undeveloped
20
1950 1960
1970 1980
1990
7Causes of the Problem
- How did we get into such a situation? What is to
be done about it? - We shall argue that economics lies at the heart
of each of two questions - view now being taken by marine biologists, e.g.
Ray Hilborn, University of Washington, another
co-winner of 2006 Volvo Foundation prize - BUT! economists alone cannot solve problem
capture fisheries management inherently
interdisciplinary in nature
8The Economists Perspective
- All natural resources seen as real capital
- capital any asset capable of yielding stream of
economic returns through time - capital, both human made and natural
- Can build up stock of capital through positive
investment sacrifice today, for hope of return
tomorrow - can also run down stock of capital -disinvestment
9Renewable and Non-renewable Natural Resources
- Is the resource capable of growth?
- if yes renewable if no, non-renewable
- non-renewable, e.g. minerals either zero
investment, or disinvestement -mining - renewable zero investment means harvesting on a
sustainable basis - skimming off growth
positive investment possible, by harvesting less
than growth - Capture fishery resource quintessential
renewable resource
10Optimal Economic Management
- Capture fisheries management from economic
perspective real asset management problem - ideal manage portfolio of capture fishery
resources (assets) to maximize net economic
benefits to society through time - Actual management decidedly less than ideal
- sub-optimal management estimated to cost World
economy up to US50 billion per year
11Common Pool Problems
- Capture fishery resources difficult to manage
- fish are mobile not visible before capture
complex species interactions environmental
shocks - Difficult in past to assign property rights to
resources fisheries typically open access,
common pool - Common pool confronts fishers with socially
perverse incentives no interest in investing in
resources resources are there to be mined - overexploitation of resources guaranteed
12Serious Fisheries Management A Recent
Phenomenon
- Serious fisheries management only 60 years old
- If costs of fishing high, overexploitation of
common pool fishery resources a minor problem - this was the view, up until 20th century! open
access nature of ocean capture fisheries
enshrined in doctrine of the Freedom of the Seas - Turn now to evolution of international legal
framework encompassing ocean capture fisheries
13Freedom of the Seas
- 17th century doctrine -Hugo Grotius
- oceans divided into narrow coastal state
territorial sea (5.5 km), and the high seas - High seas fishery resources deemed to be res
communis, the property of all . All nations to be
allowed to fish unhindered on high seas - economics high cost of ocean fishing protected
these resources in Grotius day assurances of
Thomas Huxley in 1883
14Coming of Overexploitation
- Technological advances in fishing -late 19th,
20th century- meant that high seas fishery
resources were not inexhaustible, after all. - Common Pool nature of resources led to expected
results - mining of the resources - Freedom of the Seas (pertaining to fisheries), as
a result, has been steadily eroded, but a remnant
remains
15Mining of Fishery Resources The Example of the
North Atlantic
- Biomass -measure of size of resource fishing
intensity -fraction of resource harvested per
period (fishing mortality)
Biomass
Biomass tkm-2
1.8-2.51.5-1.81.2-1.50.9-1.20.7-0.90.6-0.70.
4-0.60.3-0.40.2-0.30.1-0.20-0.10-0
Courtesy V. Christensen
16Erosion of the Freedom of the Seas
- Heavy exploitation of ocean fishery resources led
to attempts to control high seas fishing
-culminating in the - 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea -
produced 200 nautical mile (370 km) Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) regime - coastal state property rights to resources
- EEZs account for 90 of capture fishery stocks -
drastic reduction in fisheries Freedom of the Seas
17(No Transcript)
18EEZ Regime Resource Management Issues
- EEZ regime mitigated, but did not eliminate, the
common pool problem exists within EEZs - Fish are mobile fish found to cross EEZ
boundaries gave rise to shared fish stock
problem - FAO estimates that as one much as one third of
marine capture fishery harvests based on shared
stocks.
19Internationally Shared Fish Stocks
HIGH SEAS
A Transboundary stocks B Straddling stocks C
Discrete High Seas stocks
20UN Fish Stocks Agreement
- In 1982, the management of straddling stocks
seen as minor problem, but problem grew to crisis
proportions over next decade led to new UN
conference (1993-95) and UN Fish Stocks
Agreement - straddling stocks to be managed through Regional
Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs). RFMO
regime at early stage - Turn now and discuss fisheries management at (a)
domestic (intra-EEZ), and (b) international level
will NOT go into EU Common Fisheries Policy in
detail
21Domestic Fisheries Management
- The central problem counter the perverse fisher
incentives created by common pool nature of
capture fisheries - do so in the face of great uncertainty
- uncertainty can be reduced, but never eliminated
- The two approaches to management FAO)
- Incentive Blocking
- Incentive Adjusting
22Incentive Blocking Approaches
- Incentive blocking obvious, and first, approach
block fishers from responding to perverse
incentives - If fishers have an incentive to overexploit
resources block them by harvest controls e.g.
Total Allowable Catches (TACs), and gear
restrictions - BUT harvest controls lead to new common pool
problem, which economists call Regulated Open
Access
23Regulated Open Access
- If harvest restricted, then restricted harvest
becomes new common pool. Fishers have every
incentive to compete for shares of valuable
harvest - Inevitable result excess fleet capacity race
for the fish - example of Alaska pollock fishery -US EEZ prize
24Consequences of Excess Capacity
- Excess fleet capacity leads to
- direct economic waste -investment in fleet
capital that, from societys point of view, is
redundant - also shortened fishing seasons -inefficient
fishing and inferior product. - Excess capacity is also a threat to the resource
- makes monitoring of harvesting more difficult
-TAC often exceeded - mass of unsatisfied vessel owners press for
liberal TACs - TACs can easily become dangerously
liberal - FAO sees excess capacity as major threat to world
fishery resources
25Limited Entry Programs
- Regulated open access leads to additional
incentive blocking measure -restrict number of
vessels in fishery limited entry - limited entry programs often accompanied by
vessel decommissioning schemes to eliminate
existing excess capacity - Limited entry programs disappointing results
- fishers incentives unchanged
- fleet capacity a bundle of inputs resource
managers cannot control all inputs fishers
substitute uncontrolled for controlled inputs - paradox of reduced number of vessels in fishery,
but increased fleet capacity
26Fisheries Subsidies
- Fisheries management problems aggravated by
subsidies, often introduced to relieve distress
in fishing communities - Fisheries subsidies (worldwide) US 15-25 billion
per year - conservative estimate
- roughly half are benign in terms of management
the other half are malign, and intensify the
perverse incentives - the controversial decommissioning subsidies
27Management Disasters
- The initial approach to resource management, as
well as producing many disappointments, led to
some outright disasters, one the most prominent
of which was Northern Cod off Newfoundland - Canadas prize under EEZ regime
- Canada planned a resource investment program,
after implementing its EEZ - Nevertheless, in 1992 Canada had to declare a
harvest moratorium on Northern Cod fishery, which
remains to present day
28(No Transcript)
29Newfoundland Northern Cod1850 - 2000
30Incentive Adjusting Approach
- Disappointment with Incentive Blocking approach
has led to increasing emphasis on Incentive
Adjusting approach - Introduce measures that will adjust fisher
incentives to make them compatible with societys
goals possible measures - taxes little used
- create de facto property rights for fishers
rights base management
31Rights Based Management
- Rights based management takes three basic forms
- individual harvest quotas IQs
- fisher cooperatives
- community based fishery management schemes
- there are signs of convergence also some
outright blends - Key- give fishers incentive to invest
(positively) in the resource
32Individual Harvest Quotas
- TAC divided into individual shares
- originally designed to curb race for the fish and
excess capacity - property rights to harvest shares
- IQs found to work best when they are
- long term
- transferable ITQs
- expressed as percentage of TAC, rather than
fixed quantities - 1. and 3. give fishers incentives to be concerned
about long tem management of resource
33ITQ Companies
- ITQ holders have incentive to coalesce into de
facto companies, which in turn leads to fishers
acquiring de facto (collective) property rights
to resources - ITQ companies called upon to bear management
and enforcement costs - become investors in resource cover cost of
research, develop more conservationist harvesting
methods
34Spread of ITQs
- ITQs negligible 20 years ago, now cover about 15
per cent of world capture fisheries - Iceland and New Zealand the pioneers
- in EU can be found in some form in the
Netherlands, Denmark and the UK - prominent in Australia and Canada, growing
importance in US
35Alternatives to ITQs
- ITQs no universal panacea
- ineffective without good monitoring objections
on equity grounds - infeasible in many developing coastal states
- Community based fisheries management collective
property rights to community group examples
Japan and Chile - Fisher cooperatives once again fisher property
rights to fisher groups - example Alaska pollock - evidence of convergence
36Some Encouraging Signs
- Can now point to a string of fisheries, with
Incentive Adjusting management measures that are
clear success - some examples
- FAO (2005) - some indications (still weak) that
the trend towards overexploitation has leveled
off - and perhaps about to be reversed
37Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)
- In passing, one policy that is being advocated is
that of sealing off segments of fisheries, as no
fishing zones (MPAs) - To be seen as a supplement to other fisheries
management measures, not as an alternative still
have the incentive problem - Economic case for MPAs act as a buffer against
unavoidable management errors - similar to a financial portfolio holder putting
part of portfolio in low yield liquid assets
38International Fisheries Management
- Shared fish stocks the big international issue
- review of categories transboundary and
straddling - Start off with transboundary stocks, which in
1982, was THE shared fish stock issue - reasons for
- Would argue that EU Common Fisheries Policy can
be seen as a cooperative transboundary stock
management program, with cooperative mechanism,
which is strong by world standards
39Management of Transboundary Stocks
- 1982 UN Convention coastal states sharing
resource must seek to cooperate, but not required
to reach agreement - thus non-cooperative management allowed-the
default option - Two questions for economists
- what are the consequences, if any, of the
default option? - what conditions must be met, if cooperative
management regime is to be stable over long run?
40Strategic Interaction
- There will (except in unusual circumstances) be a
strategic interaction between/among states
sharing resource - harvest plans of one state will affect harvest
plans of other states. - economists forced to recognize strategic
interaction, which they do by drawing upon
theory of such interaction better known as game
theory - 2005 Nobel Prize in Economics -T. Schelling and
R. Auman -Nobel citation - Why do some groups of ---countries succeed in
promoting cooperation, while other suffer from
conflict? Schelling and Auman have established
game theory as the dominant approach to this age
old question.
41Non- cooperative Management(the default option)
- Two classes of games competitive and cooperative
- To answer Question (1), draw upon theory of
competitive games - The answer serious risk that the players will
be driven to adopt inferior, and possibly
destructive, polices - The Prisoners Dilemma (PD) -worlds most
famous competitive game - The case of Pacific salmon -Canada and the US
42(No Transcript)
43Pacific Salmon
- Canada and the US agreed in late 60s to manage
cooperatively salmon resources from northern
California to Gulf of Alaska - very difficult, but negotiators driven on by
manifestations of Prisoners Dilemma (PD),
including fish wars - treaty signed in 1985, but seized up in early
90s for 6 years. During period of treaty
paralysis, PD returned with a vengeance. - Conclusion cooperation does matter Question (2)
must be addressed head on
44Cooperative Management
- Some requirements for stable cooperative
management arrangement - effective intra-EEZ management
- every player to receive economic benefits at
least as great as it would get under
non-cooperation - stunningly obvious, but often ignored in practice
45Some More Requirements
- c. maximize scope for bargaining through side
payments (transfers) - The North Atlantic Salmon Fund
- d. resiliency. Every arrangement likely to be
subject to unpredictable environmental or
economic shocks. If arrangement lacks resilience
in face of such shocks, it will founder - Pacific salmon again
- Norwegian Spring Spawning Herring
46Straddling Stock Management
- Everything that we said about transboundary stock
management holds, question - what needs to be
added, if anything? - Non-cooperative management - nothing more needs
to added, except that threat of a Prisoners
Dilemma type of outcome even greater , e.g.
Grand Banks of Newfoundland
- High Seas (light blue) and EEZs (dark blue),
47Cooperative Management of Straddling Stocks
- Cooperative management of straddling stocks more
complex than that of transboundary stocks - Straddling stocks to be managed through RFMOs,
with coastal, and distant water, fishing states
as participants -e.g WCPFC - Two issues
- illegal vs. unregulated fishing, and free
riding - the New Member problem
48(No Transcript)
49Illegal vs. Unregulated Fishing and Free Riding
- Non-members of RFMO fishing unauthorized in a
members EEZ are guilty of illegal fishing- can
be dealt with firmly. - If non-members do same thing in high seas portion
of RFMO - engaged in unregulated fishing - - bad, but not clear what can be done about it
- Unregulated fishing open invitation to free
riding, which can easily undermine RFMO
50New Member Problem
- Under UN Fish Stocks Agreement , charter RFMO
member cannot bar outright new members/entrants - New Members and implicit free riding
- implicit free riding as damaging as the explicit
form - Turning poachers into gamekeepers and implicit
vs. explicit free riding - the Great Dilemma
51The Great Dilemma
- Recent cutting edge analysis concludes that, if
control over unregulated fishing is weak, there
will be cases in which there is no way out of
the dilemma - Implications RFMO members will have to be
granted at least de facto property rights to
resources in high seas portion of RFMO - high seas be such in name only
- unregulated fishing will become illegal fishing
52Some Conclusions
- Economics does play a central role in capture
fisheries management -fundamental importance of
economic incentives facing fishers and states - Open access fisheries lead to certain
overexploitation, because of perverse fisher
incentives - Incentive Adjusting approach to domestic
management, which gives fishers incentives to
invest in resources, showing encouraging signs of
success - Fisheries subsidies, however, are an ongoing
threat
53Some More Conclusions
- International fisheries shared stocks
non-cooperation gives states incentive to
overexploit resources - Straddling stocks most difficult problem- need to
eliminate unregulated fishing, which can be seen
as arising from a Freedom of the Seas hangover