NGO Accountability and Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

NGO Accountability and Evaluation

Description:

Answerability to those in higher authorities. Holding actors responsible for ... Freidrich (1935) and Finer (1941) Debate. Freidrich: Internal accountability ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:563
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Pit7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NGO Accountability and Evaluation


1
NGO Accountability and Evaluation
2
Why Accountability Now?
  • Growing dependence on public money
  • Favored child of official aid system
  • Growing visibility and influence
  • Tightening resources
  • Growing advocacy activities
  • Beyond the magic bullet mindset
  • Freer climate post Cold War
  • Practicing what NGO preaches

3
Accountability
  • Answerability to those in higher authorities
  • Holding actors responsible for their actions
  • Responsible for ones actions
  • Answering to stakeholders (LB) for the results
    and impact of performance
  • Stakeholders directly or indirectly affected by
    projects

4
Classification of Stakeholders
  • Patrons official funding agencies, international
    and bilateral donors, and host governments.
  • Clients local NGOs, partner organizations,
    grassroots organizations, beneficiaries, and, in
    its broadest sense, the community.
  • Peers fellow NGOs and affiliate members
  • Themselves board, volunteers, staff

5
Verification of Accountability
  • Freidrich (1935) and Finer (1941) Debate
  • Freidrich Internal accountability
  • Limitations of external accountability methods
  • Imposing requirements and rules on organization
  • Emphasizes internal accountability self-control
  • Finer External accountability
  • Subject to abuse of power
  • Marginalized population
  • Importance of external control

6
Multiple Dimensions of Accountability
  • Hierarchical/Bureaucratic Accountability
  • Based on a popular notion of Weberian bureaucracy
  • close supervision for compliance with directives
  • Formal rules and procedures
  • as an instrument of organizational and managerial
    control
  • Annual review and written report

7
Legal Accountability
  • carry out tasks in accordance with constitutional
    principles, laws or contractual obligations
  • Emphasize oversight and monitoring by external
    parties
  • Legally binding behaviors
  • Authorized by law to work on behalf of official
    funding agencies
  • Donor requirements

8
Political Accountability
  • Central to democratic process
  • Emphasizes responsiveness to constituents needs
  • Satisfaction of key stakeholders
  • Verified through the ballot box
  • NGO advocacy activities
  • Do NGOs possess legitimacy to act on behalf of
    marginalized population?

9
Professional Accountability
  • Emphasizes individual responsibility and internal
    accountability mechanisms
  • Relies less on formal oversight
  • on professionalism and professional standard
  • Peer review process
  • Self-monitor and regulation
  • Expertise of NGO workers
  • Humanitarian code

10
Moral and Ethical Accountability
  • Internally based
  • Based on the commitment to do the right thing
  • Moral and ethical obligations to act and make
    decisions in the interest of marginalized
    population and the public
  • Standards of good behavior arise from conscience
  • concerns for the general welfare
  • Altruistic drive

11
Current Theories of NGO Accountability
  • Multidimensional Accountability
  • Each dimension of accountability
  • Is suitable to each group of stakeholders
  • Patron
  • Peers
  • Themselves
  • Clients

12
Multidirectional Accountability
  • Alan Fowler
  • Long chain of resource flow, multiple objectives,
    demands, multiple institutions, sectors
  • Respond to different requests
  • Top down and bottom up
  • Dictated by context advocacy, emergency, or
    development activities
  • Complication of the international aid system

13
Upward vs. Downward Accountability
  • By Michael Edwards and David Hulmes
  • Two directions of NGO accountability
  • Based on ability to impose sanction and
    performance impact
  • Upward accountability to patrons
  • Downward accountability to clients
  • Overaccountability vs. underaccountability

14
Contingency Theory
  • By David Brown and Julie Fisher
  • INGO accountability is not a fixed notion
  • Operates in a much more dynamic environment
  • Different kinds of information and feedback are
    needed for different audiences
  • contingent upon both the demander and the context
    of the demand
  • Donors formal requirements, standardized

15
Accountability vs. Evaluation
  • Accountability broader concept
  • Accountability strengthening performance
  • Evaluation and monitoring mechanisms to generate
    data
  • Participatory evaluation
  • Benchmarking
  • Difficulties in evaluation work
  • Organizational learning

16
Managerial Challenges
  • Time
  • Money
  • Resources
  • Apparent results vs. long-term impact
  • Measurable objective NGO goals
  • Accessibility
  • Whose indicators to use?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com