Title: USB 2.0 Cable and Connector Testing
1(No Transcript)
2USB 2.0 Cable and Connector Testing
- George G. Olear IIContech Research, Inc.
- Sheldon SingletonNational Technical Systems
3Agenda
- Cable and connector testing for logo
- Mini-B connector testing for design validation
4Cable and Connector Testing
- Cable and Connector Testing - Why ?
- Communications Loss
- Interop Problems
- Orlando 1999 - CCDWG
- Test Laboratory Selection
- Specification Review
- Product Delisting
- Group 6 Testing as a Starter
- Provisional Listing
5Cable and Connector Testing
- Benefits of Compliance Testing
- The use of listed cables and connectors is
required for devices to get on the Integrators
List - You must be listed in order to use the new logo
which indicates that the cable is high speed
capable.
6Cable and Connector Testing
7Cable and Connector Testing
- Successes and Failures
- Vibration and Shock
- Attenuation
- Cable Impedance
- Shielding Effectiveness
8Cable and Connector Testing
- Integrators List
- Listed on Integrators List
- Advanced Connectek USA
- AMP/Tycoelectronics
- American Power Conversion
- Bizlink International Corp
- Chant Sincere Co.
- Cheng Uei Precision Industry Co.
- Comoss ElectricCo.
- Copartner Wire and Cable Mfg. Corp.
- Dong Guan Shinko Wire Co.
- FCI Electronics
- Foxconn
- I/O Systems Inc. formerly Elite Electronics, Inc.
- Fujikura America
- Glory Mark Electronic LTd.
- Golden Bridge Electech Inc.
- God Way Industrial Co.
- Hannstar Electronics Corp.
- I/O Interconnect
- JST
- Ji-Haw Industrial
- Joinsoon Electronics Mfg. Co., Ltd.
- Lin Shiung Enterprise Co., Ltd.
- Longwell Electronics
- Lumberg, Inc.
- Mainsuper Enterprises Co., Ltd.
- Mitsumi
- Molex
9Cable and Connector Testing
- Integrators List cont.
- Northstar
- Pan International
- Perfect Technic Enterprise Co. Ltd.
- Sinbon Electronics Co.
- Sunf Pu Technology Co.
- TIME Interconnect Ltd.
- TSAY-E (BVI) International
- Tayo Electric Wire Cable Co., Ltd.
- Total Technologies, Ltd
- Unixtar Technology Inc.
- Wha Yu Industrial Co., Ltd.
- Wieson Electronic Co., Ltd.
10Mini-B Connector Design Validation
- The Mini- B Cable and Connector minimum
qualification test program - The program consisted of 4 manufacturerswho
agreed - 1st - The Design
- 2nd - Submission of their first products for
independent testing . - And the players are
- ACON Marunix Mitsumi Molex
11Mini-B Connector Design Validation
- Minimum Qualification Testing Program
- Group 1 Testing
- Durability
- Vibration and Shock
- Cable pullout
- Group 3 Testing
- Mixed Flowing Gas
- Group 6 Testing
- Attenuation
- Impedance
- Propagation Delay/ Delay Skew
- Shielding Effectiveness
12Group 1 Tests
- Durability
- Mating/Unmating Forces
- Contact Resistance (LLCR)
- Vibration and Mechanical Shock
- Contact Chatter
- Contact Resistance (LLCR)
- Cable Pullout
- Continuity
13Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results
- Low Level Circuit Resistance (milliohms)
14Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results
- Unmating Forces after durability testing
15Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results
16Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results
- Mini B Unmate Forces
- Manual Durability
17Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results
18Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results
- Mini B Unmate Forces
- Automatic Durability
19Group 3 Tests
- Mixed Flowing Gas
- Plating Integrity - Contacts
- Contact Resistance
- Plating Integrity - Shell
- Contact Resistance of the Shell
- Contact life
- 2 days exposure 1 year field life
20Cable and Connector TestingGroup 3 Test Results
- Low Level Circuit Resistance during MFG test
21Group 6 Tests
- Impedance
- Affected by Incorrect cable impedance, Improper
cable/connector terminations, Defective connector
contact plating, Incorrect connector interface
dimensions - Attenuation
- Affected by Cable Construction, Cable Length,
Cable Capacitance, Inductance, Skin Effect and
Frequency Range - Propagation Delay
- Affected by Cable Construction, Cable Length,
Impedanceand Termination, and Measurement System
Rise Time
22Group 6 Tests
- Propagation Delay Skew Testing
- Affected by Cable Construction, Cable Length,
Impedance and Termination, MeasurementSystem
Rise Time, and Connector/CableAssembly
Techniques - Shielding Effectiveness
- Affected by Cable Braid Construction,
Connector/Cable Assembly Construction
23Cable and Connector TestingGroup 6 Test Results
- Impedance
- 1 Meter Cable Assembly Requirement (76.5 to
103.5) - Sample ID A Group
B Group C Group
D Group -
- 001 88.07 84.95 88.17 91.90
- 002 86.90 85.68 86.60 93.16
- 003 86.08 85.24 85.90 90.76
- 004 86.02 85.73 89.39 93.85
- 005 85.34 85.84 88.04 92.21
- 006 86.03 84.76 88.71 90.53
- Average 86.41 85.37 87.80 92.07
24Group 6 Test Results - Attenuation
- A Group B Group C Group D Group
- Freq./Req. (MHz/dB)Average Average Average Avera
ge -
- 0.064/.08 .0183 .0212 .0072 .0026
- .256/.11 .0210 .2370 .0003 .0034
- .512/.13 .0249 .0272 .0139 .0104
- .772/.15 .0283 .0307 .0356 .0186
- 1/.2 .0315 .0338 .0233 .0251
- 4/.39 .0789 .0812 .0682 .0873
- 8/.57 .0815 .1059 .0853 .1060
- 12/.67 .1236 .1376 .1098 .1295
- 24/.95 .2138 .2395 .2047 .1929
- 48/1.35 .3915 .4290 .3900 .3278
- 96/1.9 .3100 .3640 .3386 .3488
- 200/3.2 .4709 .5259 .4909 .4952
- 400/5.8 .9934 1.0005 .9981 .8974
25Cable and Connector TestingGroup 6 Test Results
- Issues 5 Meter Cable Attenuation Specification
- Attenuation values to be evaluated at the
following frequency ranges 4 MHz, 8 MHz, and 12
MHz - Average Results of 15 different samples
- 4 MHz Requirement (.39 dB), Results .3986
dB - 8 MHz Requirement (.57 dB), Results .5710
dB - 12 MHz Requirement (.67 dB), Results .7740 dB
26Cable and Connector TestingGroup 6 Test Results
- Propagation Delay
- 1 Meter Cable Assembly Requirement (5.2 ns
max) - Sample ID
- A Group B Group C Group D Group
-
- 001 5.02 5.12 4.92 4.92
- 002 5.02 5.02 4.92 4.92
- 003 5.32 5.02 4.82 4.92
- 004 5.02 5.12 4.92 4.82
- 005 5.12 5.12 4.92 4.92
- 006 5.02 5.02 4.92 4.92
- Average 5.09 5.07 4.90 4.90
27Cable and Connector TestingGroup 6 Test Results
- Propagation Delay Skew
- 1 Meter Cable Assembly Requirement (100 ps
max) - Sample ID
- Group A Group B Group C Group D
-
- 001 8.83 33.91 25.25 49.64
- 002 25.47 38.7 1.6 35.27
- 003 31.72 41.83 2.3 7.83
- 004 41.09 11.39 3.1 40.76
- 005 6.06 32.47 19.42 86.76
- 006 34.12 24.43 0.21 0.65
- Average 24.55 30.46 8.65 36.81
28Cable and Connector TestingGroup 6 Test Results
- Sheilding Effectiveness
- Issues Sheilding Effectiveness values to be
evaluated at various frequencies and various
lengths. - Average results of various samples tested
(Requirement20 dB minimum) - 1 Meter 24 samples Worst case frequency 15.5dB
_at_ 800 MHz - 2 Meter 5 samples Worst case frequency 16.5 dB
_at_ 200 MHz - 5 Meter 5 samples Worst case frequency 19.44
dB _at_ 1 GHz
29Cable and Connector Testing
- Where Are We Going From Here?
- Cable and Connector Certification
- Completion of the Mini-B Testing
- Mini-B Connector ECN
- Cable and Connector Class Document 1.0