Title: Industry Trade Associations Committee of Six Update
1Industry Trade AssociationsCommittee of
SixUpdate
- The American Apparel and Footwear Association
(AAFA) - The National Textile Association (NTA)
- The Parachute Industry Association (PIA)
- Clemson University
- APBI Meeting 5/10/07
2Background The Perfect Storm
- Following 9-11 industry encountered its perfect
storm - Product complexity increased as all Services
transitioned from standard to unique uniform
systems and new technologies. - Existing and new manufacturers invested heavily
to support increased demand and to fill the
pipelines with many new products. - New and unknown customers appeared as the new
Army PEO Soldier organization began to develop
new items and procure some of them directly. - As demand was satisfied there was too much
capacity, over procurements, lack of funding, no
commercial work to fall back on, and the large
capital investments had not been recouped.
3Background Industry Change Efforts
- 21 months ago key members of these 3 major trade
associations joined efforts to work with DLA and
the Army to minimize the resulting negative
impact on military readiness and the industry - Over 30 meetings conducted with limited
actionable results. - Vastly increased knowledge and understanding
between industry and military. - Optimistic about path forward because of support
of all Services, DLA, and Congress.
4Research, Development and Technical Support
Life Cycle Management
Buy, Store, and Distribute
Logistical Support
5Problem Overview
- Core problem
- Lack of supply chain (SC) wide product flow.
- Root cause problems
- Lack of enterprise-wide full communication and
collaboration. - Procurement funding gaps.
- Procurement practices that cause SC gaps and
prevent contractors from planning. - Business processes and systems that cause SC gaps.
6Problem Overview
- Core problems
- Lack of supply chain (SC) wide product flow.
- Military view of Clothing and Textiles (CT) as
commodity products. - Root cause problems
- Lack of enterprise-wide full communication and
collaboration. - Procurement funding gaps.
- Procurement practices that cause SC gaps and
prevent contractors from planning. - Business processes and systems that cause SC gaps.
7Baseline Supply Chain Throughput
Start fiber production
Bought by 41 weeks
Fiber becomes slacks in 29 weeks
8Baseline Supply Chain Throughput
If acceptable slacks are available from end-item
manufacturers because of SC-wide forecasting and
launching at acceptable risk, a retailer only has
to wait the order transport time. This defines
commodity products.
9Baseline Supply Chain Throughput
Since (1) military products are unique from fiber
forward, (2) there are no secondary markets for
military unique products, (3) commodity buying
practices minimize prices, and (4) military
funding, buying actions, and technology changes
are not reliable, the risk is too high for
industry to pre-position non-commodity end-items
or components for the military.
10Baseline Supply Chain Throughput
Thus, the commodity approach forces the military
to stock sufficient inventories to meet peacetime
and surge demand for the longest possible SC-wide
throughput time or live with stock outs. This
approach is very costly to everyone and these
large inventories block the transition to new
technologies. There is a
better way!
Bought by 41 weeks
11ACU Coat Suppliers Throughput Times
- 1 military unique nylon fiber manufacturer.
- 2 military unique NyCo yarn manufacturers.
- 4 (was 6) fabric weavers.
- 5 dyers and finishers.
- 1 to 3 manufacturers for secondary components.
- 20 Coat manufacturers.
- 52 critical path dependent production processes.
- ECWCS fabric visual.
- 13 to 43 or more weeks from fiber to garment
depending on the flow of military orders. (Not a
commodity system)
12Core Problem Summary
- Overall lack of understanding that military
unique clothing and textiles are not commodities
- Must be actively managed throughout entire life
cycle. - Cannot rely on commercial market to ensure
availability. - Industry/Government collaboration is vital.
- New product development generally addresses
military uniqueness of components SC-wide. - No provisions in life cycle management system or
procurement process to address SC-wide product
flow.
Military Unique Item Development, BUT Procured as
if an Off-the-Shelf Commodity
13Core Root Cause Problem Review
- Core problems Lack of SC-wide product flow and
military view of CT items as commodities. - Root cause problems
- Lack of collaboration.
- Funding gaps.
- Procurement practices that cause SC gaps and
prevent contractor planning. - Business practices, processes and systems that
cause SC gaps.
14Root Cause Problem DiscussionLack of
Collaboration
- Industry-wide collaboration is vital to new
product development. - Full collaboration minimizes upstream risks.
- Both the industry and military have many touch
points. SC collaboration is a best practice that
optimizes performance with minimum resources. - Full collaboration is vital for implementing
other best supply chain management practices.
15Root Cause Problem DiscussionFunding Gaps
- Funding is consistent with commodity practices.
- But a funding flow must exist at the minimum
sustaining requirement level for each critical
SC. - DLA monthly obligation authority allocation
- Works fine for commodities used by the military
that also have a commercial market. - Is problematic for military unique CT products
because there are no provisions for placing
delivery orders solely to keep critical supply
chains operating at minimum rates. - Congressional, DoD, DLA, DSCP fixes required.
- War reserve and warstopper funds can leverage
flow and surge strategies and multiply
performance.
16Root Cause Problem DiscussionProcurement Issues
- Eliminate unrealistic IDIQ Min-Max ranges.
- Provide Forecasting to Industry.
- Implement Supply Chain Managers.
- Timely awards of contracts and delivery orders.
- Honor minimums on multi-year contracts.
- Stop re-bidding option years.
- Provide protection against uncontrollable cost
increases in current and future Multi-year
contracts. - Raise Safety Levels carried by DSCP.
- Improve Source Sampling and Shade Evaluation
Processes that cause delays. - Improve System for Better Prompt Payment.
- Reduce industry and mandatory work equally across
the board. - Use all available non-commodity procurement tools
to maintain a minimum level of product flow down
the supply network. - Fully enforce existing domestic manufacturing
laws and support extending to Homeland Security.
17Solution Overview Collaboration
- Full internal military and industry-military
collaboration to educate and eliminate core and
root cause problems - Executive level
- Sets policies and ensures DoD-wide leveraging of
resources and results. - Managerial level
- Implements communications and collaboration by
supply chain management best practices. - Manages product flow SC-wide.
- Ensures seamless hand-off of new products to
sustained procurement. - Technical level.
- Centers on Service/DLA/industry best practice
technical data management by SC-wide
collaboration.
18Solution Overview Modern Practices
- Use modern process improvement approaches such as
the Lean Initiative the Air Force has underway
enterprise wide - Top down Leaning of internal Air Force system
through external procurement agencies and
industry. - Lean supply chain management best practices such
as pulling what is needed most rather than
pushing what is forecasted to be short.
19Proposed Action Details
- At the DoD executive and managerial levels change
fundamental policies and procedures to eliminate
SC gaps. - Create a single DoD-wide SC manager to optimize
SC-wide funding and product flow - for each major CT SC
- by coordinating RD and sustainment procurement
needs within the military - and by providing a single, primary point for
communications and collaboration between the
military and industry.
20Proposed Action Visual
Military Services DLA
Industrial Base
1. At the executive managerial levels change
the policies and procedures and eliminate the
issues that cause SC Gaps.
2. DoD-wide Supply Chain Managers Maintain
Product Flow Full Collaboration NPD Sustainment
Buying Modern Technical Data Management
Executive
Raw Materials
Managerial
Components
Technical
End Items
Questions?
21Next Steps
- Receive and incorporate additional industry-wide
improvement suggestions. - Meet jointly with DLA and all Services to
formulate joint vision, objectives, and action
plan. - Nomex meeting in June is first major opportunity
to optimize the performance of a supply chain.