ARNG Equipment Readiness

1
ARNG Equipment Readiness ARNG G-4 COL Denny
Danielson Phone [phone] E mail
dennis.danielson_at_ngb.army.mil
2
What Has Changed in the Army?
CHALLENGES
YESTERDAY

• Base budget vs. supplemental
• Cost
• Time to complete
• HLD vs. GWOT
• High near term demands vs. slowly growing
  resources

Requirements and Reality

• AC - 83 fill of authorized EOH
• ARNG - 58 fill of authorized EOH
• Tiered modernization
• Focus on first to fight
• Few deployments
• FAD/DAMPL fielding
• Cascading effect
• ARNG maneuvers equipment

TODAY

• AC - 50 fill in CONUS
• ARNG - 40 fill in CONUS
• - Mix of old and new equipment
• IDd 342 Dual-Use LINs
• Focus on deployed forces
• More deployments
• Use of TPE
• Battle losses
• Cyclic readiness (ARFORGEN)
• ARPL priority
• Higher common standard
• Distribute equipment at FFR levels
• All COMPOs maneuver equipment

Investment Strategy
TOMORROW

• AC ARNG BCTs -100 of FY08 MTOE equipment
  procured by FY15
• Cyclic, predictable readiness
• Standardized, more capable MTOEs
• ARFORGEN priority fill per funding levels
• No equipment maneuver

RESERVE FORCES

• Becoming Operational vs. Strategic
• Being modernized to like-AC levels

Fighting One War While Preparing for the Next
As of 20 Oct 06
3
Equipment in States Possession
All LINs IF ALL UNITS WERE RETURNED HOME against
current requirements w/subs AVG 52
All LINs not currently deployed or SBE against
FY06 MTOEs w/ subs AVG 40
Critical Dual Use LINs against current
requirements w/subs AVG 51
AK
NH
ME
VT
36 42 47
35 47 49
WA
39 56 58
34 45 51
42 53 40
MT
ND
MA
40 51 56
36 48 49
36 48 49
MN
OR
NY
42 51 52
ID
WI
41 48 46
43 56 49
SD
RI
36 49 53
MI
44 52 54
38 48 42
35 43 45
WY
41 50 55
NJ
48 53 51
PA
40 50 50
CT
IA
39 50 43
34 42 42
OH
NE
IL
38 48 58
42 50 47
IN
NV
44 52 51
UT
46 52 47
34 51 46
30 44 56
WV
VA
CO
MD
39 56 50
41 48 53
29 37 39
MO
DE
35 51 46
48 56 63
CA
KS
42 45 48
44 51 56
46 56 52
43 52 50
46 54 50
KY
42 51 49
NC
DC
TN
OK
42/52 53
37 54 37
AZ
43 51 55
AR
NM
SC
50 56 55
35 43 49
GA
37 46 47
AL
26 38 39
MS
PR
48 58 63
43 49 49
51 62 56
49 55 50
LA
TX
HI
33 44 49
40 57 56
46 52 51
GU
FL
VI
46 54 53
14 28 40
44 44 51
Percentages are as of 26 Oct 06 Progress being
made due to redeployed units
Most modern equipment to OIF/OEF
4
ARNG Equipping Strategy
Equipping Strategy
Deployments, Cross-leveling SBE Battle Loss
Pre 9-11
Today
Future
EOH As and Ps 75 All LINs 58
EOH 52 Overall - Deployed 40 Conus
EOH Improves To support ARFORGEN
Equipping Strategy
FY 08 Requirements Increase in ARNG Equipment
Requirements Reduces Available EOH (w/o new
buys)
Reset
3.2B 1225.6 Payback FY07 Supp MOAs
35B New Procurement FY05-FY13
HD Critical Dual-use LINS EOH 51 Today
5
PRE-DECISIONAL INFORMATION
ARNG Equipping Requirements Over Time

• Facts Assumptions
• Like AC MTOE
• Like AC Fill
• Accounts for Modernization
• Uses AERC 4.1 as Start Point
• Assumes Avg. Attrition Rate of 4
• Assumes Avg. of 2B per year in Cascades
• Assumes 3 Inflation per Year

FY06 362K Structure 81.8B Rqmnt
Like AC FY08 3482K Structure 80.9B Rqmnt
OTOE 342 8K Structure 104B Rqmnt
Like AC FY13 342 8K Structure 88.43B Rqmnt
100
37B Shortages
80
- POM 08-13 based on PB07 Extended - 7.55B -
Future Supplementals?

60
8B Subs
Projected 4.8B FY 07 Supplemental

36B Prime on Hand

40
Projected Funding 21B (FY05-11) 1.9B (AVN)
Cascades NGREA Congress Adds
20
0
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
Total ARNG Equip in including SBE RESET
Deployed 2.17B received in FY07 Substitute
Items
Predictability of receipt of funding
Higher Lower
PRE-DECISIONAL INFORMATION
6
ARNG Equipping Requirements Over Time
FY06 362K Structure 81.8B Rqmnt
Like AC FY08 3482K Structure 80.9B Rqmnt
OTOE 342 8K Structure 104B Rqmnt
Like AC MTOE Like AC Fill
100
37B Shortages
80
- POM 08-13 based on PB07 Extended - 7.55B -
Future Supplementals? Delta of PB07 Extended
vs. Army 138.8B Essential Needs is a 4.02B
reduction

60
8B Subs
Projected 4.8B FY 07 Supplemental

Total Projected Funding (FY05 to FY13) is 35.95B
FY13 ARNG EOH Approx70

40
Projected Funding 21B (FY05-11) 1.9B (AVN)
Cascades NGREA Congress Adds
20
36B Prime on Hand
0
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
Total ARNG Equip in including SBE RESET
Deployed 2.17B received in FY07 Substitute
Items
Predictability of receipt of funding
Higher Lower
7
Army National Guard RESET FY07 (Repair)

• ARNG Field RESET Stats
• 127M total
• 461 Units
• 210,281 pieces of equipment

• Department of the Army approved ARNG
• execution of Home Station Field RESET
• Title10 funding fenced for ARNG
• Approved by VCSA 20 Sep 06
• Equipment available to Commanders Faster
• Increased local flexibility on workload
  prioritization
• Decreased backlogs at Demobilization sites
• Decreased time spent in transit

• AMC is responsible for Sustainment RESET
• Completion goal of 360 days
• Compo Firewall
• Work is performed at Depots or National
  Contractor

• ARNG Sustainment RESET Stats
• 266.7M total
• 319 Units
• 12,039 pieces of equipment

8
ARNG SBE Status
9
ARNG ARFORGEN Equipping Strategy - Bridging Phase
AR2B Fixes for DEFs
New Procurement/ AC Cascading

EDD-3
120 Days
TPE/SBE
Candidate DEF Pool DEF
YR 6
YR 5
HLD/DSCA Missions and Other Emerging Requirements
EDD-2
YR 4
YR 3
EDD-1
RESET
YR 2
Leave Alone Years
YR 1
Maintaining Building Training HLD/DSCA
Capabilities
ARL Donors
40 CONUS EOH means ARNG must
First Focus almost entirely on preparing DEFs
to deploy (10 of force)
Then Build unit readiness across the states
(90 of force)
Next Respond to emerging missions requirements
While Maintaining Building Training HLD/DCSA
capabilities (Dual-Use 342)
10

• Questions?