Title: ALM and Fund Management
1ALM and Fund Management
- Jyoti Kumar Pandey
- Deputy General Manager
-
- Member of Faculty
- College of Agricultural Banking, Pune
2What is Banking
- Section 5(b) defines banking Accepting for the
purpose of lending or investment of deposits or
money repayable on demand or otherwise and
withdrawable by cheque, draft, order or otherwise
Risk taking is an inherent function of banking -
Allan Greenspan
3Banks get affected by
- Actions of Central Banks
- Actions of the Government
- Domestic and International Disturbances
- Inflation
4Deregulation
- Banks are now operating in a fairly deregulated
environment and are required to determine on
their own, interest rates on deposits and
advances - Intense competition for business involving both
the assets and liabilities together with
increasing volatility in the interest rates has
brought pressure on the management of banks to
maintain a good balance among spreads
5Risks Faced by Banks
- Credit Risk
- Market Risk
- Liquidity Risk
- Interest Rate Risk
- Operational Risk
6Effects of Risk Factors
- Loss of Market Value
- Loss of Reserves
- Loss of stakeholders confidence
7ALM
- The ALM guidelines issued by RBI has been
formulated to serve as a benchmark for banks
which lack a formal ALM system - Those who already have their existing system may
fine tune their information and reporting system
8Purpose of ALM
- Capture the maturity structure of the cash flows
(inflows and outflows) in the Statement of
Structural Liquidity - Tolerance levels for various maturities may be
fixed by the bank keeping in view banks ALM
profile, extent of stable deposit base, nature of
cash flows etc.
9ALM
- ALM is about managing market risk and liquidity
risk together - Capital market exposure of banks is small
- Exchange risk is highly specialized
- Hence ALM is an integrated risk management
approach for managing liquidity risk, interest
rate risk
10The problem of mismatch
- Mismatches in maturity
- Mismatches in interest rate
- How does bank makes the spread?
- Borrow short and lend long and keep the spread
- Maturity mismatch is the basis of profitability
- Risk management does not eliminate mismatch
merely manages them
11The problem of mismatch
- Interest Rate Risk ? Affects profitability
- Liquidity Risk ? May lead to liquidation
- General Strategy
- Eliminate Liquidity Risk (not the mismatch)
- Manage Interest Rate Risk
- Consciously create gaps
12Asset Liability Transformation
- Banks are exposed to credit and market risks in
view of the asset-liability transformation - With liberalisation, banks operations have
become complex and large , requiring strategic
management
13ALM Pillars
- ALM Information Systems
- ALM Organisation
- ALM Process
Applicable to Scheduled UCBs and Tier II UCBs For
Tier II UCBs effective date is December 2008
14ALM Pillars (Contd.)
- ALM Information systems
- MIS
- Information availability
- Accuracy
- Adequacy
- Expediency
15ALM Pillars (Contd.)
- ALM Organisation
- Structure and responsibilities
- Level of top management involvement
16ALM Pillars (Contd.)
- ALM Process
- Risk Parameters
- Risk Identification
- Risk Measurement
- Risk Management
- Risk Policies and Procedures, prudential limits
and auditing, reporting and review
17ALM Information Systems
- ALM framework built on sound methodology with
necessary information system back-up - ALM to be supported by management philosophy and
clearly states risk policies and procedures /
prudential limits - Banks may utlilise Gap Analysis or Simulation
- Important to have availability of timely,
adequate and accurate information
18ALM Information Systems (Contd.)
- ALM Data could be developed by following
approach, in case UCBs do not have requisite
information - Analyse behaviour of asset and liability products
in sample branches that account for significant
business (60-70 per cent) - Based on this make rational assumption for the
other branches
UCBs have limited area of operations and hence it
would be easier for them to make such assumptions
and better access to data
19ALM Organisation
- Board should have overall responsibility for
management of risk - Board should decide risk management policy and
procedure, set prudential limits, auditing,
reporting and review mechanism in respect of
liquidity, interest rate and forex risk - ALCO
- Consisiting of banks senior management including
CEO - Responsible for adherence to the polices and
limits set by Board - Responsible for deciding business strategies (on
asset liability side) in line with banks
business and risk objectives - ALM Support Group
- Consisting of operating staff
- Responsible for analysing, monitoring and
reporting risk profiles to ALCO - Prepare forecasts showing effects of various
possible changes in market conditions affecting
balance sheet and suggesting action to adhere to
banks internal limits
20ALM Organisation (Contd.)
- ALCO decision making unit responsible for
- Balance Sheet planning from risk-return
perspective which includes management of
liquidity, interest rate and forex risks - Pricing of deposits and advances, desired
maturity profile etc. - Monitoring the risk levels of the bank
- Review of the results and progress of
implementation of decisions made in previous
meeting - Future business strategies based on banks
current view on interest rates - To decide on source and mix of liabilities or
sale of assets - To develop future direction of interest rate
movements - To decide on funding mix between fixed and
floating rate funds, wholesale vs. retails
deposits, short term vs. long term deposits etc.
21ALM Organisation (Contd.)
- ALCO size would be dependent on the size of the
UCB - May comprise of
- CEO or Secretary
- Chief of Investment / Treasury including those of
forex, credit, planning etc. - Head of IT if a separate division exists
- UCBs may at their discretion may have
Sub-committees and Support Groups
22ALM Process
- Scope is
- Liquidity Risk Management
- Interest Rate Risk Management
- Trading (Price) risk Management
- Funding and Capital Management
- Profit Planning and business Projections
UCBs, generally, are not exposed to forex risk
23ALM
24Liquidity Risk
- Arising due to
- Over extension of credit
- High level of NPAs
- Poor asset quality
- Mismanagement
- Hot Money
- Non recognition of embedded option risk
- Reliance on few wholesale depositors
- Large undrawn loan commitments
- Lack of appropriate liquidity policy and
contingent plan
25Liquidity vs. Earnings
- Bank must be in a position to-
- Balance their need for liquidity with their need
for earnings - More liquid assets tend to provide lower return
than do less liquid assets
26Assessing Liquidity Position
- Assessing a banks liquidity position can be
challenging - An adequate position for one bank may not be
sufficient for another - A position considered adequate for a bank in one
time period may not be so in another - BANK SPECIFIC DYNAMIC
27Liquidity risk-Manifestation
- Funding risk
- Need to replace net outflows due to unanticipated
withdrawal/non-renewal of deposits - Time Risk
- Need to compensate for non-receipt of expected
inflows of funds-performing assets turning into
non-performing assets
28Liquidity Risk (Contd.)
- Regulatory Requirements
- CRR / SLR
- Call Money Borrowings prescriptions / limits
- ALM Guidelines
- Host country prescriptions
- Overseas Offices of Indian Banks
29Factors Reducing Liquidity Risk
- Availability of Refinance
- LAF Facility
- Open Market Operations
- CBLO
30Liquidity Risk - Symptoms
- Offering higher rate of interest on deposits
- Delayed payment of matured proceeds
- Delayed disbursement to borrowers against
committed lines of credit - Deteriorating asset quality
- Large contingent liabilities
- Net deposit drain
31Liquidity Risk - Measurement
- Two methods are employed
- Stock approach - Employing ratios
- Flow approach - Time bucket analysis
32Liquidity Risk - Measurement
- Liquidity Ratios
- Volatile Liability Dependence Ratio
- Volatile Liabilities minus Temporary Investments
to Earning Assets net of Temporary Investments - Shows the extent to which banks reliance on
volatile funds to support Long Term assets - where volatile liabilities represent wholesale
deposits which are market sensitive and temporary
investments are those maturing within one year
and those investments which are held in the
trading book and are readily sold in the market - Growth in Core Deposits to growth in assets
- Higher the ratio the better
33Liquidity Risk Measurement (Contd.)
- Purchased Funds to Total Assets
- where purchased funds include the entire
inter-bank and other money market borrowings,
including Certificate of Deposits and
institutional deposits - Loan Losses to Net Loans
- Loans to core deposits
34Liquidity Risk Measurement (Contd.)
- Does not lead to proper assessment of liquidity
gaps due to - Illiquidity of liquid assets
- Their ready marketability
- Difficulty to convert easily into liquid cash
with least loss of value from the previously
quoted market rates
35Liquid Assets to Total Assets
- Liquid Assets to Total Assets
- Show the percentage of liquid assets in the asset
structure of the bank - 18-20 - Liquid assets generally are cash balances with
RBI balances with other banks investments
available for sale money market instruments
36Liquid Assets to Total Deposits
- Liquid Assets to Total Deposits
- This ratio indicates extent of liquidity
maintained by a bank for meeting the demand made
by the depositors-Sometimes taken as a measure of
bank liquidity-20-22
37Loans to Deposits
- Loans to Deposits
- Loans to deposits ratio indicates the degree to
which the bank has already used up its available
resources to accommodate the credit needs of the
customers - A high loan deposit ratio indicates that a bank
will have comparatively low liquidity
38Loans to Assets
- Loans to Assets
- This ratio indicates the percentage of illiquid
assets to total assets - A rise in this ratio would indicate lower
liquidity
39Loans to Core Deposits
- Loans to Core Deposits
- Those deposits which are not subject to any large
volatility - Average level of previous years deposit is
generally taken as core deposits - This ratio helps in assessing level of deployment
of core portion of deposits
40Loans to Investments
- Loans to Investments
- While loans provide higher returns compared to
investments, these suffer from credit risk and
are more illiquid than investments - A proper mix of loans and investments keeping in
view liquidity and yield considerations need to
be fixed
41Cash Flow Approach
- Preparing a structural liquidity by taking into
account balance sheet on particular date and
place in maturity ladder according to time
buckets - Identify the liquidity needs - to evolve methods
to meet it - Negative gaps in individual time buckets indicate
the need. The need could be controlled by - prudential limits
- as also by regulating the basis of business
structure/financial flexibility of banks - Regulatory Limit of 20 on outflows in first two
time buckets
42RBI Guidelines on Liquidity Risk
- Methodology prescribed in ALM System- Structural
Liquidity Statement Dynamic Liquidity Ladder
are simple - Need to make assumptions and trend analysis-
Behavioural maturity analysis - Variance Analysis at least once in six months and
assumptions fine-tuned - Track the impact of exercise of options
potential liquidity needs - Cap on inter-bank borrowings Call money
43Structural Liquidity Statement Sch. UCBs
Circular Sept. 17, 2008 for Scheduled UCBs More
granular approach adopted by splitting first
bucket of 1 14 days in SSL into Next Day, 2-7
days and 8 14 days Net cumulative negative
mismatches during the Next Day, 2 7 days, 8
14 days and 15 28 days bucket should not exceed
5, 10, 15 and 20 of the cumulative cash
outflows in the respective buckets Banks may
undertake dynamic liquidity management and should
prepare the SSL on daily basis to Top Management
/ ALCO SSL may be reported to RBI at fortnightly
intervals within 10 days of the reporting
Friday Revised format would be applicable from
January 01, 2009 UCBs in Tier II are also
covered Scheduled UCBs to report structural
liquidity position and interest rate sensitivity
to RBI as part of OSS data
44Structural Liquidity Statement Sch. UCBs
(Contd.)
45Structural Liquidity Statement Sch. UCBs
(Contd.)
46Structural Liquidity Statement Sch. UCBs
(Contd.)
47Structural Liquidity Statement Sch. UCBs
(Contd.)
- Liability on account of event cash flows CRR /
SLR shortfall, wage settlement and any other
contingency under respective maturity bands - All overdue liabilities in Day 1, 2 7 days and
8 14 days bucket based on behavioral estimates - Interest and installments from advances and
investments which are due for less than one month
1-6 months time band - Interest and installments from advances and
investments which are over due for less than one
month may be placed in Day 1, 2-7 days and 8 14
days based on behavioral pattern. Further,
interest and installments due (before
classification as NPAs may be placed in 29 days
3 months bucket if the earlier receivables remain
uncollected
48Liquidity Risk Management for Tier 1 UCBs
- Basic guidelines for liquidity management issued
on September 17, 2008 - Banks advised to prepare
- Statement of Structural Liquidity and
- Statement of Short Term Dynamic Liquidity
- To be prepared as on the last reporting Friday
of March / June / September / December and submit
to the Board within one month from the last
reporting Friday - First such submission to be made to the Board as
on last reporting Friday of December 2008
49Liquidity Risk Management for Tier 1 UCBs (contd.)
- Maturity profile of SSL into 8 buckets
- 1-14 days
- 15-28 days
- 29 and up to 3 months
- Over 3months and up to 6 months
- Over 6 months and up to 1 year
- Over 1 year and up to 3 years
- Over 3 years and up to 5 years
- Over 5 years
- Mismatches (negative gaps) during 1-14 and 15-28
days time bands in normal course should not
exceed 20 of the cash flows in each time band
50Liquidity Risk Management for Tier 1 UCBs (contd.)
- Short Term Dynamic Liquidity Statement
- 1-14 days
- 15-28 days
- 29-90 days
- STDL required for securities in the trading book
- SLR investments / securities are generally not
very liquid and lack depth and are therefore
shown in the residual maturity bands
corresponding to residual maturity
51Liquidity Risk Management for Tier 1 UCBs (contd.)
- Holding period not to exceed 90 days
- Cut loss limit is prescribed
- Defeasance periods are prescribed Time taken to
liquidate the position on the basis of liquidity
in the secondary market are prescribed - Marking to market on a weekly basis
52Trading Book
- Maintained distinctly from those required for
complying with Statutory Reserve Requirements - Subject to preconditions
- Composition and volume clearly defined
- Maximum maturity / Duration of the portfolio
restricted - Holding period not exceeding 90 days
- Cut Loss prescribed
- Marked to market on a weekly basis
53Maturity Profile Liquidity for Tier 1 UCBs
54Maturity Profile Liquidity for Tier 1 UCBs
(contd.)
55Maturity Profile Liquidity for Tier 1 UCBs
(contd.)
56ALM for Tier II UCBs
- Similar to what prescribed to Scheduled UCBs
- Initially at least 60 of assets and liabilities
to be covered and remaining 40 on assessment
basis only - 100 coverage by April 01, 2010
- Statements required to be prepared
- Statement of Structural Liquidity
- Statement of Interest Rate Sensitivity
- Short-Term Dynamic Liquidity Statement
57ALM for Tier II UCBs SSL
- To be prepared, to start with, as on last
reporting Friday of March / June / September /
December - To be put up to the ALCO / Top Management within
a month from the close of the last reporting
Friday - Reporting on a fortnightly basis from December
2008 (intended) - Maturity profile of SSL into 8 buckets
- 1-14 days
- 15-28 days
- 29 and up to 3 months
- Over 3months and up to 6 months
- Over 6 months and up to 1 year
- Over 1 year and up to 3 years
- Over 3 years and up to 5 years
- Over 5 years
58ALM for Tier II UCBs SSL (contd.)
- Mismatches in cash flows to be kept at minimum
- Initially for 1-14 and 15-28 days it may not
exceed 20 normally - In case banks wishes to operate on a higher
limit, it could be done with approval of the
Board / Management - Objective of RBI is to enforce tolerance level
strictly with effect from April 01, 2010
59ALM for Tier II UCBs SIRS
- Only rupee assets, liabilities and off-balance
sheet positions to be reported - Statement to be prepared as on last Friday of
March / June / September / December - To be submitted to ALCO / Top Management within
one month of reporting Friday - To be placed before the Board in its next meeting
- Banks expected to move over to monthly reporting
system from April 01, 2010
60ALM for Tier II UCBs SIRS (contd.)
- Maturity profile of SIRS into 7 time bands
- Up to 3 months
- Over 3months and up to 6 months
- Over 6 months and up to 1 year
- Over 1 year and up to 3 years
- Over 3 years and up to 5 years
- Over 5 years
- Non-sensitive
- Gap is the difference between Rate Sensitive
Assets (RSA) and Rate Sensitive Liabilities (RSL) - If RSA gt RSL ve Gap Bank benefits if
interest rate goes up - If RSA lt RSL or RSL gt RSA -ve Gap Bank
benefits if interest rate goes down
61ALM for Tier II UCBs SIRS (contd.)
- Banks to set prudential limits on individual gaps
with the approval of the Board - The prudential limits should have a bearing on
the Total Assets, Earning Assets or Equity - Banks need to work out Earnings at Risk (EaR)
i.e. 20 30 of the last years NII or Net
Interest Margin based on their views of
interest rate movements - After sufficient experience is gained by the UCB
in ALM, RBI may consider introduce capital
adequacy for market risk
62ALM for Tier II UCBs STDS
- To be prepared as on each reporting Friday
- To be put up to the ALCO / Top Management within
2-3 days from the close of the reporting Friday
63ALM for Tier II UCBs Other Issues
- SSL and SIRS could be reported through OSS
- Communication to be issued
- All the three ALM Statements may be put up to the
ALCO as on last Friday of December 2008
64Some points
- Break the beyond 5 year bucket into financial and
non-financial - The sum of all the gaps in the structural
liquidity may or may not be zero - The cumulative gaps also called forward payment
structure - Why is the forward payment structure significant?
- Stress testing
65Cumulative Gaps
- Forward Payment Structure indicates future
liquidity position - Long term strategic approach needed to correct an
increasingly negative FPS
66Dynamic Liquidity Gap Analysis
- Tracking cash flow on a short term time horizon-
changes on account of fresh business are
interpolated in the projections - RBI has asked banks to monitor short term
liquidity on a dynamic basis over time horizon
spanning from 1-90 days
67Short-Term Dynamic Liquidity Statement
- Main focus on short term mismatches
- 1-14days
- 15-28 days
- 29-90 days
68Dynamic Liquidity Analysis(Amount Rs. Crore)
69Interest Rate Risk
- Changes in yield curve of G-Secs
- Changes in administered rate of interest
- Changes in forward exchange rates
- Changes in prices of other assets and inflation
rates
70Reasons for Interest Rate Risk
- On account of asset transformation
- Many deposits are used for one big loan
- Periodical review of assets and liabilities
- Due to mismatches between maturity / repricing
dates as well as maturity amounts between assets
and liabilities - Depositors and borrowers may pre-close their
accounts
71RSA and RSL
- Rate Sensitive Assets (RSA) Assets whose value
is dependent on current interest rate - Risk Sensitive Liabilities (RSL) Liabilities
whose value is dependent on current interest rate
72Gap / Mismatch Risk
- Arises on account of holding RSA and RSL with
different principal amounts, maturity / repricing
rates - Even though maturity dates are same, if there is
a mismatch between amount of assets and
liabilities it causes interest rate risk and
affects NIM
73Interest Rate Risk
- Assessed by Gap Report Gaps between RSA and RSL
- Asset / Liabilities are rate sensitive if
- Within the time interval under consideration
there is a Cash Flow - Repayment of term loans
- Interest rate resets / reprices
- Change in interest rate in CC account, Term Loans
before maturity - RBI changes interest rates
- Interest on Savings Bank Deposits, CRR balance
etc.
74Interest Rate Risk (contd.)
- Assessed by Gap Report Gaps between RSA and RSL
- Gaps may be identified in the following time
bands - Upto 3 months
- Over 3 months and upto 6 months
- Over 6 months and upto 1 year
- Over 1 year and upto 3 years
- Over 3 years and upto 5 years
- Over 5 years
- Non-sensitive
75Interest Rate Risk (contd.)
- Immediate impact of changes is on banks profit
by change in its spread NII - NII gives the earning perspective
- Long term impact is change in its MVE or Net
Worth - As marked to market value of banks asset
liabilities, off-balance sheet positions get
affected - Gives the economic value perspective
76Interest Rate Risk (contd.)
- Each bank to set its prudential limits on
individual gaps with approval of Board - Prudential limits set with respect to bearing on
Total Assets, Earning Assets or Equity - Banks may work out their Earnings at Risk
20-30 of last years NII or NIM
77Interest Rate Sensitivity (Contd.)
78Interest Rate Sensitivity (Contd.)
79Interest Rate Sensitivity (Contd.)
80Gist
- Scheduled UCBS and Tier II UCBs
- Have 3 pillars I n place
- ALM Information Systems
- ALM Organisation
- ALM Process
- Prepare 3 statements
- Statement of Structural Liquidity (quarterly)
- Short Term Dynamic Liquidity Statement
(fortnightly) - Statement of Interest Rate Sensitivity
(quarterly) - Review of Statements by ALCO / Top Management
- To report from last reporting Friday of December
2008 - SIRS to be moved to monthly reporting by April
01, 2010 - SSL to be fortnightly basis from December 2008
81Gist (contd.)
- Scheduled UCBs already reporting SSL and SIRS
through OSS - For Tier II UCBs separate communication to follow
82Gist (contd.)
- Tier I UCBs
- Prepare 2 Statements
- Statement of Structural Liquidity (quarterly)
- Statement of Short Term Dynamic Liquidity
(quarterly) - To be put up to the Board as on last Friday of
December 2008 - For reporting through OSS separate communication
to follow
83Thank You