Title: Pure Foods and Drugs Act of 1906
1Pure Foods and Drugs Actof 1906
2Pure Food and Drug Act
for preventing the manufacture, sale, or
transportation of adulterated or misbranded or
poisonous or deleterious foods, drugs, medicines,
and liquors, and for regulating traffic therein,
and for other purposes.
3Pure Foods and Drugs Act of 1906
- Did not apply to intrastate commerce
- Jurisdiction was based on adulterated or
misbranded articles in interstate commerce - Dealt with interstate and foreign commerce in
adulterated or misbranded foods - Exempted items intended for export that were
prepared according to foreign manufacturers
specifications
4Food
- Pure Foods and Drugs Act of 1906 defined food as
- all articles used for food, drink, confectionery
or condiment by man or other animal, whether
simple, mixed or compound
5Food Adulterated if
- Any substance mixed with so as to lower or
injuriously affect its quality - Any substituted substance wholly or in part
- Any valuable component extracted
- Treated so as to conceal damage or inferiority
- Contains any added ingredient which may render it
injurious to health - Any putrid, diseased substance or unfit for food
6Misbranded if
- Imitation offered for sale under name of another
article - Falsely labeled so as to confuse or mislead
purchaser - Contents in terms of weights and measures not
plainly or correctly stated on outside of package - Label contains false or misleading statements or
design concerning the ingredients of the food
7Remedies
- Seizure
- Under direction of court
- Disposal
- Of adulterated of misbranded articles
- Imprisonment and/or 500 fine
- Violation considered a misdemeanor criminal
offense - Stiffer penalties for repeat offenses
8Safe Harbor
- Dealer protected from prosecution under the 1906
Act if had guarantee signed by supplier/vendor
/jobber/wholesaler attesting that articles not
misbranded or adulterated when purchased
9Problems with the First Act
- Food industry resisted passage of the 1906 Act
- Not accustomed to regulation
- Failed to provide clear-cut definitions and
standards - Could not determine imitation if no std for the
original - Appropriations bills to fund enforcement and to
establish food standards were not passed - Expert opinions successfully challenged as
arbitrary b/c no legal stds
10Problems with the First Act
- no set of authorities can equitably execute a
food law without a set of standards of purity for
their guide Harvey Wiley - Requirement of Intent
- First Act required not only proof of adulteration
or misbranding, but also Gov had to prove
offender intended to adulterate or misbrand - Gov never won a case / defendant plead ignorance
11Problems with the First Act
- Harvey Wiley hell-raising
- Poison squad determined preservatives as a group
were bad. (Reported in Bulletin 13, Foods and
Food Adulterants) - Responsibilities of Secretary of Agriculture not
clearly stated - Defenders could argue Secretary exceeding
authority - Attention diverted from first Act by WWI
12Amendments to the First Act
- Sherley Amendment (1912)
- Gould Amendment (1913)
- net weights
- Kenyon Amendment (1920)
- wrapped meat in paper in packaged form
- Butter Amendment
- Defined butter (oleomargarine)
- McNary-Mapes Amendment (1930)
- Standards of quality for canned foods (Birdseye)
- Sea Food Inspection Amendments (1934)
13Other factors
- Consumers demonstrating for stricter laws
- Guinea Pigs Kallet Schlink 1933
- Exposed dangers in everyday foods, and drugs
- Similar to Upton Sinclair book
- Same year Roosevelt became President
- Draft of a new bill introduced as the Copeland
Bill on Jan 4, 1934 - Passed by 75th Congress 1937 and
- Signed by President Roosevelt on June 25, 1938
14Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act 1938