Karnataka Waste-to-Power - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Karnataka Waste-to-Power

Description:

Karnataka Waste-to-Power Astrid Fernandez Annie Hsieh Daniel Pedisich Akshat Sarvaria Sue Veksler Agenda Background on India Current Business Environment The Case and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:138
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: pagesSte
Category:
Tags: karnataka | power | waste

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Karnataka Waste-to-Power


1
Karnataka Waste-to-Power
Astrid Fernandez Annie Hsieh Daniel
Pedisich Akshat Sarvaria Sue Veksler
2
Agenda
  • Background on India
  • Current Business Environment
  • The Case and Solution
  • Risks and Benefits
  • Feasibility Analysis/ Valuation
  • Future Prospects
  • Conclusion/ QA

No pun intended!
3
India Social Background
4
India Political Background
  • A parliamentary federal democracy.
  • The Republic of India is made up of 29 states,
    and six union territories.
  • As the largest democracy in the world, India has
    held regular and largely free elections since
    1947.
  • Economic liberalization through opening up to
    foreign participation.
  • The Kashmir conflict with Pakistan.

5
India Economic Background
  • 5th largest economy in the World and the 3rd
    largest GDP in Asia.
  • GDP growth averaged 5.8 percent in the 1990s.
  • Indias economic growth started to decelerate
    after 1996 due to
  • - the decline in economic reforms in the
    financial sector, infrastructure, trade and
    industrial policy, privatization, and labor
    laws.
  • - slowing of growth in real investment.
  • Effects of the Asian currency crisis.

6
Why India?
  • The government has been supporting and
    encouraging greater outside participation in its
    private sector.
  • Long tradition of an established legal,
    accounting, and judiciary system
  • Higher disposable incomes of Indian citizens and
    growing middle class.
  • Large English-speaking population.

7
Why Bangalore, Karnataka?
  • Indias technology sector presently represents 1
    of its 200 Billion GDP (or 2 Billion).
  • Expected to be 87 Billion by 2008 (Nasscom and
    McKinsey and Co.).
  • Bangalore is the Silicon Valley of India.

8
Our Solution Karnataka Waste-to-Power
9
Problems Solutions
  • Too much garbage Problem
  • Not enough electricity Problem
  • Waste to Energy Solution

KWP offers a two-pronged solution, simultaneous
waste disposal and energy production.
10
How does Waste-to-Energy work?
11
Why is Karnataka the best place?
Physical Characteristics of Solid Waste from some
Cities in India
12
Risks Associated With India
  • Decreasing funds for education could impede
    economic growth.
  • Dispute with Pakistan leads to travel advisories
    and less investors.
  • Political instability and lack of consistent
    government.

13
More Risks Associated With India
  • Expertise lacking in regulatory bodies.
  • Indian Governments have not come to terms with
    independent regulation.
  • Cannot trust or even speculate decisions made by
    the regulatory body when in fact, an investor
    does not know who is calling the shots.

14
But Opportunities Remain.
  • Apparent mismatch between production and
    population

15
Opportunities in India
  • In India the information technology industry
    currently represents just over 1 of the
    countrys 200 billion economy.
  • This reflects expectations that Internet usage in
    India will expand at one of the fastest rates in
    Asia, boosting knowledge and ultimately income.

16
The Valuation
  • Based on the model of Wheelabrator Technologies
    Inc., a U.S. based subsidiary of Waste
    Management, Inc.
  • The initial purchase of a fleet of garbage trucks
    is based on a fleet of 500 trucks, costing
    100,000 each.
  • We assume that we charge the municipal government
    30/ton to collect waste. This is a cost that we
    intend to increase 3 per year in real terms.
  • We intend to produce 0.5 of the energy required
    in the local market (approximately 100
    megawatts), and increase our production by a rate
    of 3 annually.

17
The Valuation
  • Operating a sanitary disposal (a capped landfill)
    costs approximately 25/ton, increasing 3
    annually.
  • Transportation costs are approximately 18/ton,
    also increasing 3 annually, and this represents
    the bulk of our expenses.
  • Plant operational costs grow at about 4.33
    annually to accommodate more input and output.
  • Electricity is sold at the market rate, and
    increases at the rate of inflation each year.
  • The amount we need to put in a sanitary landfill
    for disposal actually decreases over time.

18
The Valuation
19
The Valuation
20
Revenue Cost of Capital
  • The positive net present value of 46,646,893.33
    is based on a discount rate of 17.77, the
    approximate cost of equity, over the twenty-year
    projected life of this illiquid investment,
    taking a 4.3 inflation rate into account,
    increasing all revenues and expenses by at least
    this amount. We also include a thirty percent
    subsidy by the Indian government for the initial
    construction costs of the power plant, which is
    being provided to companies involved in renewable
    energy projects.

21
Potential Problems?
  • There is a strong chance that that our valuation
    accurately reflects the worth of this project.
  • Unforeseen costs, such as litigation, strikes,
    changes in the regulatory environment, cleanup of
    environmental catastrophe, or inability to
    collect funds due for our collection services,
    could severely hamper our business model.

22
Potential Problems?
  • Other risks to the valuation include, but are not
    limited to
  • High initial capital cost,
  • financing issues due to lack investor confidence
    in a risky venture,
  • most of the technologies developed may not be
    suitable for the nature of Indian waste.

23
Potential Problems?
  • Lack of financial resources at the local and
    state government levels.
  • Lack of long term strategy and concrete policy
    on waste management.
  • Lack of awareness of environmental issues in the
    culture, tempering enthusiasm for environmentally
    beneficial projects

24
But
  • Our model assumes that we are the sole collector
    of municipal solid waste in Karnataka, and we
    process 100 of the waste.
  • This is likely to occur for the foreseeable
    future due to the extensive start up costs to
    start such a business in this risky, but
    potentially profitable, market.

25
Future Prospects
  • The model could be implemented in other Indian
    cities, as well as other developing markets.
  • A real option to expand could increase the net
    present value dramatically.
  • The social benefits of managing waste responsibly
    would make the value-added nature of this project
    a worthwhile venture for the local and national
    governments to support.
  • Other foreign investors in the region may be
    willing to invest in this venture as well
    everyone needs electricity and waste management!

26
Any Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com