PowerPoint Sunusu

1
THEMATIC PRIORITY AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
1st Call for Proposal
Evaluation of Specific Targeted Research
Projects, Coordination Actions and Specific
Support Actions for Aeronautics and Space
Ref 1st call EC DG RTD/H3- The Space and
Transport Head of Unit Aeronautics, Briefing,
May 2003
2
Prof.Dr. Yurdanur Tulunay ITÜ Faculty of
Aeronautics and Astronautics Ayazaga Campus,
34469 Maslak, Istanbul/Turkey
3
Ar-Ge Destegi ve Yönetimi çok sey
söylenebilir
Verimli Yaklasim durum çalismasi
case-study
Avrupayla bütünlesme FP6 programi
Ar-Ge Yönetimi 1. Çagri yasanmis
bir deneyim
çagdas, güncel bir Ar-Ge yönetim modeli
3
4

• The Independent Experts
• The role of the evaluators is to assist the
  Commission in the evaluation of the proposals.
• The evaluators shall not have conflict of
  interest.
• The evaluators are obliged to maintain
  confidentiality!
• The evaluators are expected to be independent,
  impartial and objective!
• The evaluators have to respect the rules

4
5
5
6

• Outline of the briefing
• The instruments in FP6
• The Aeronautics and Space Work programme
• The Call for Proposals with deadline
  20 March 2003
• Proposal structure
• The evaluation

• Overall Procedure
• The process for STREP, CA and SSA
• Evaluation Criteria

6
7
A wider range of better differentiated
insturments in FP6

• New instruments

• Integrated projects (IP)
• Networks of excellence (NoE)
• Article 169 (joint implementation of national
  programmes)

• Traditional instruments

• specific targeted research projects (STREPS)
• co-ordination actions (CA)
• specific support actions (SSA)

7
8
8
9
Purpose of Strategic Target Research Projects
(STREPs)

• Designed to generate the knowledge required to
  improve European competitiveness and to meet the
  needs of society or Community policies

• by considerably improving existing or developing
  new products, processes or services and/or
• by proving the viability of new technologies
  offering potential economic advantage

9
10
Purpose of Coordination Action (CA)

• to promote and support the networking and
  coordination of research and innovation
  activities at national, regional and European
  level

• by establishing in a coherent way co-ordinated
  initiatives of a range of research and innovation
  operators, in order to achieve improved
  integraiton of the European research

10
11
Purpose of Specific Support Actions (SSA)

• Specific Support Actions are intended

• to complement the other FP6 instruments,
• to help in preparations for future Community
  research and technological development policy
  activities and
• to stimulate, encourage and facilitate the
  participation of SMEs, small research teams,
  newly developed and remote research centres, as
  well as those organizations from the Candidate
  Countries in the activities of the priority
  thematic areas.

11
12
Sixth Framework Programme
I. Focusing and integrating research
Budget

( million)
2 255 1 100 1 155 3 625 1 300
1. Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for
health

• Advanced genomics and its applications for health
• Combatting major diseases

2. Information Society technologies
3.
Nanotechnologies and nano-sciences,
knowledge-based multifunctional materials and
new production processes and devices
4. Aeronautics and space

1 075
5. Food quality and safety 6. Sustainable
development, global change and ecosystems
685 2 120 810 610 700 225 1 300 13 345

• Sustainable energy systems
• Sustainable surface transport
• Global change and ecosystems

7. Citizens and governance in a knowledge-based
society 8. Specific activities covering a wider
field of research
TOTAL
12
13
FP6 AERONAUTICS and SPACE BUDGET

• TOTAL BUDGET 1 075 Euro

• Aeronautics
  840 ( 75090)

• Space
  235( 135100)

13
14
AERONAUTICS TOP-LEVEL OBJECTIVES
(Consistent with the Strategic Research Agenda
recommendations)

• To meet societys needs for a more efficient,
  safer and environmentally friendly air transport
• To win global leadership for European aeronautics
  with a competitive supply chain, including small
  and medium size enterprises

14
15
Research Areas and Scope for Aeronautics in FP6

• Research Areas (consistent with the SRA)

• Strengthening competitiveness (of the
  manufacturing industry)
• Improving environmental impact with regard to
  emissionsnoise
• Improving aircraft safety and security
• Increasing the operational capacity and safety of
  the air transport system

• Scope

• Commercial transport aircraft (comprising
  regional and business aircraft and rotorcraft),
  including their systems and components
• On-board and ground-based elements of the ATM
  (4th area)

15
16
Overview of the Evaluation Process
Eligible Proposal(s) assigned to each STREP or
SSA Panel
Individual expert assessment

• Individual Assessment Report (IAR)

• Consensus marks are not necessarily the average
  of individual marks

Group Consensus

• Consensus Report
• Ethical Issues Report (EIR)-Optional

• Final marks and comments
• Prioritization of proposals

• Evaluation Summary Report (ESR) -For each
  proposal-
• Panel Report

Extended Panel (A few experts from each panel)
16
17

• Evaluation Criteria for STREPs
• Threshold score
• 
  (out of 5)
• Relevance to programme objectives 3
• Potential Impact 3
• Scientific and Technical excellence 4
• Quality of the consortium 3
• Quality of the management 3
• Mobilization of resources 3

Each to be scored between 0 and 5 (half marks may
not be given) Overall threshold 21 out of 30
17
18
Evaluation Criterio for STREPs 1 Criterium
Relevance to programme objectives Extent to
which 1.1. the proposed project addresses
the objectives of the work
programme. Threshold 3 out of 5

18
19
Evaluation Criteria for STREPs 2 Criterium
Potential Impact Extent to which 2.1. the
proposed project is likely to have an impact on
reinforcing competitiveness or on solving
societal problems 2.2. exploitation and/or
dissemination plans ore adequate to ensure
optimal use of the project results 2.3. the
proposal demonstrates a clear added value in
carrying out the work at European level and takes
account of research activities at national level
and under European initiatives (e.g.Eureka)

Threshold 3 out of 5

19
20
Evaluation Criteria for STREPs 3 Criterium
Scientific and Technical excellence Extent to
which 3.1. the project has clearly
defined objectives. 3.2. the objectives represent
clears progress beyond the current
state-of-the-art. 3.3. the proposed ST approach
is likely to enable the project to achieve its
objectives in research and innovation.

Threshold 4 out of 5

20
21
Evaluation Criteria for STREPs 4 Criterium
Quality of the consortium Extent to which 4.1.
the participants collectively constitute a
consortium of high quality 4.2. the
participants are well-suited an committed to the
tasks assigned to them. 4.3. there is good
complementarity between participants 4.4. the
real involvement of SMEs has been adequately
addressed. Threshold 3 out of 5

21
22
Evaluation Criteria for STREPs 5 Criterium
Quality of the consortium Extent to which 5.1.
the project management is demonstrably of high
quality 5.2. There is a satisfactory plan for
the management of knowledge, of intellectual
property and of other innovation-related
activities. Threshold 3 out of 5
22
23
Evaluation Criteria for STREPs 6 Criterium
Mobilisation of resources Extent to which 6.1.
the project foresees the resources (personnel,
equipment, finance...) 6.2. the resources are
convincingly integrated to form a coherent
project 6.3. the overall financial plan for the
project is adequate Threshold 3 out of 5
23
24

• Evaluation Criteria for CAs
• Threshold score
• (out of 5)
• Relevance to programme objectives 3
• Potential Impact 3
• Quality of the co-ordination 4
• Quality of the consortium 3
• Quality of the management 3
• Mobilization of resources 3

Each to be scored between 0 and 5 (half marks may
not be given) Overall threshold 21 out of 30
24
25

• Evaluation Criteria for SSAs
• Threshold score
• (out of 5)
• Relevance to programme objectives 4
• Potential Impact 3
• Quality of the Support Action 3
• Quality of the management 3
• Mobilization of resources 3

Each to be scored between 0 and 5 (half marks may
not be given) Overall threshold 17.5 out of 25
25
26

• Horizantal issues to be adressed
• Ethical and/or safety issues (with regard to the
  use of humans or animals)
• Gender issue (see Part B7 of proposal)
• Societal implications (see Part B 7 of proposal)
• Synergies with education (see Part B 7 of
  proposal)
• Third country participation (justification)

26
27

• Practical issues
• Mobile phones are not allowed in the evaluation
  rooms!
• Laptops should not be brought in the evaluation
  premises!
• Lunch time need for information? (please
  contact the moderator)
• Need for assistance? (please contact the
  moderator)

27
28
Implementation Plan and Related Issues
Aeronautics ROADMAP Thematic priority 4
Aeronautics and Space
28
29

• Call 2B- Aeronautics
• Specific Programme Integrating and strengthening
  the European Research Area
• Activities

• Priority thematic area of research Aeronautics
  and Space.
• Priority thematic area of research Sustainable
  development, global change and ecosystems.
  Sub-priority Sustainable energy systems
• Priority thematic area of research Sustainable
  development, global change and ecosystems.
  Sub-priority Sustainable surface transport

29
30
3. Call title Periodic call in the area of
Aeronautics and Space, Sustainable energy
systems and Sustainable surface transport.
4. Call identifier 5. Date of publication   
17 June 2003 6. Closure date(s) 17 December 2003
at 17.00 (Brussels local time). 7. Total
indicative budget 175 Million , broken down as
follows

• Aeronautics and Space 20 Million
• Sustainable energy systems 107 Million
• Sustainable surface transport 48 Million

30
31
31
32
Links to Other Research Topics
32
33
Implementation Plan and Related Issues
Space ROADMAP Thematic priority 4 Aeronautics
and Space

56 The Galileo activities will be managed by the
Galileo Joint Undertaking. In this context the
European Commission will provide each year a
grant to the Joint Undertaking that will proceed
with the Calls in the areas indicated in the Work
Programme. 56 Dates could be revised in function
of the effective installement of the Galileo
Joint Undertaking 56 Specific instruments will be
determined by the Galileo Joint Undertaking
33
34
Call 2B- Space

• Specific Programme Integrating and strengthening
  the European Research Area
• Activity Priority thematic area of research
  Aeronautics and Space.
•  Call title Thematic call in the area of Space
  2003.
•  Call identifier 60
•  Date of publication61 17 December 2002.
•  Closure date(s) 62 20 March 2003 at 17.00
  (Brussels local time).
•  Total indicative budget 60 Million , broken
  down as follows

34
35
35
36
Areas called and Instruments
36
37
Areas called and Instruments
37
38
Aeronautics and Space Find a call
Latest Calls InformationThe Electronic Proposal
and Preparation System (EPSS) is now operational
for a number of calls.Make sure that you deliver
your proposal to the correct addressProposal
Notification is now available the European
Commission encourages Proposal Notification in
order to expedite planning for proposal
evaluations.
38