Title: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly
1Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly
- Presented by
- Christos A Ioannou
- University of Minnesota
2- Diamond is the only appropriate gem to symbolize
lifetime love and commitment - The company spends 180 million a year worldwide
to advertise cut diamonds - a product it doesn't
even sell ... -
-
3What is De Beers?
BUT
- miner and buyer of 70 of the world's
- rough diamonds
4 5Rough Diamonds
6Cut Diamonds
7Jewelry Stores
8Outline
- Origin
- How it achieved its market power
- How it has managed to control the market
- How the Monopoly operates
- Conflict Diamonds
- Moving Away From the Monopoly
- Antitrust Laws
- Technological Advances
- Lev Leviev
9Facts about De Beers
- Most successful monopoly of modern trade
- Other commodity prices (e.g. gold, silver)
fluctuate greatly in response to economic
conditions - Diamonds prices are constantly rising
10- 20th century, De Beers sold 85 to 90 of the
diamonds mined worldwide - Rockefeller's Standard Oil
- Gates' Microsoft
11De Beers is a typical example of monopoly!!!
- It is almost the sole seller of diamonds
-
- Sells a commodity with no close substitutes
- (created this illusion by advertising)
- It restricts output and it responds to changes
in market demand
12 13 - Before the 19th century
- Diamonds were exceptionally rare
- Small quantities in India and Brazil
- No diamond mines were discovered
- Nowadays
- Many diamond mines
- Republic of South Africa
- Sub-Saharan countries
- Siberia
- Australia
- Canada
-
14Origin
- 1869
- First diamond mines in the colonies of southern
Africa - Drastically increased the number of stones
available
- 1870
- Many diamond hunters bought mines
15Cecil Rhodes
- Bought the rights to two mines on the farm of
- Nicolas
- and
- Diedrick De Beer
-
- in the Cape Colony (now South Africa).
16Diamond hunters realized that scarcity increases
diamond prices.
- Had no other alternative than to merge their
interests into a single entity - control the mines production
- keep the scarcity illusion
17De Beers Consolidated Mines Limited
- Established 12th March 1888
- Rhodes, founding chairman
18De Beers
- South African company
- By 1890, De Beers controlled 95 of the worlds
diamond production
19 20 21Wholesalers
- Group of 10 merchants
- (London Diamond Syndicate)
- Agree to be purchasing the entire production from
all the De Beers mines - Resell the diamonds to cutters
22 23Ernest Oppenheimer
- Started buying his own mines
- (Consolidated Diamond Mines)
- Started competing with De Beers
- Oppenheimer family still controls De Beers
24His thinking was
- The only way to increase the value of diamonds
is to make them scarce, that is to reduce
production
25Example Great Depression
- Public stopped buying diamonds (demand shifted
left)
- London Diamond Syndicate could not absorb the
worlds diamond production at the high prices - Huge Stockpiles
- Wanted to put them in the market
- Oppenheimer realized that
- Prices will fall
- People will lose faith in diamonds
26 27 28- Sell the diamonds to a selected group of cutters
that abide De Beers rules.
- To eliminate excess supply closed all major
mines in South Africa -
- Year Production
(carats) - 1930 2,242,000
- 1933 14,000
29De Beers Stockpile
- By 1937 De Beers stockpile of diamonds had grown
to..
40 million carats (20 years supply) !!!
30How the Monopoly Functions
- Supplier of Choice System
- sends invitations to 120 chosen clients (diamond
cutting factories in NY, Tel Aviv, Antwerp) to
attend the 10 annual sights
- client receives a small box
- uncut diamonds
- price of the box (1-25 million)
31Rules of the Game
Rule 1 DTC decides who gets which box
Rule 2 No Haggling over price (price maker)
Rule 3 Take the entire Box or None
32Rule 4 No client may resell the diamonds in his
box in their uncut form
Remark Israeli Dealers (1977)
33Rule 5 Clients will provide any information to
evaluate the diamond market
- Before the sight, clients fill out a detailed
questionnaire - number of uncut diamonds in inventory
- diamonds in process to cut
- future sales
-
- De Beers audits their cutting factories in
surprised visits
34Thus, De Beers decides
- How many diamonds of each quality will be
distributed in total - How this supply will be divided among the clients
- Price of diamonds
35What determines their decisions?
- Demand
- Information about rate of family formation in USA
and Japan - Economic conditions
36Supplier of Choice aims to stimulate growth in
diamond demand and close this opportunity gap.
37 Conflict Diamonds
- Angolan Adventure
- 18-year civil war
- Began as a struggle against the Portuguese
occupation - Escalated to the country's natural resources
38- De Beers buys lots of diamonds from areas
controlled by rebels. - Rebels used the money to finance the war
- By 1994, De Beers' Angolan adventure threatened
to become a PR nightmare - Fearful of a consumer backlash, De Beers closed
its buying offices in Angola and the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC)
39Kimberley Process Certification Scheme
- The KPCS is a joint governmental, international,
and civil society initiative to stem the flow of
conflict diamonds - Certifies that shipments of rough diamonds are
free from conflict - Was decreed in 2000 at Kimberley
- So far 45 participants
40Moving AwayAntitrust Laws
- In 2004 De Beers paid 10 million fine for price
fixing - As part of the class action settlement, De Beers
promised to comply with the US antitrust laws - In February 2006, De Beers entered similar
agreement with EU
41Moving AwayTechnological Advances
- We can manufacture diamonds (carbon, heat and
high pressures) - The cost has been going down
- Apollo is a publicly funded R D establishment
42Moving AwayLev Leviev
- Worth is 2 billion
- Expressed interest in entering the diamond
industry - Healthy competition will lead to a correction in
the prices of diamonds