The Reorganization of University Advancement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

The Reorganization of University Advancement

Description:

The Approximate Annual Planning/Process Calendar ... goal and to discuss upcoming calendars and strategies directly involving the Dean. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: rbmag
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Reorganization of University Advancement


1
The Reorganization of University Advancement
  • Scott C. Warrington, VP for UA

2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
MANAGEMENT MATRIX THE MANAGEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
OFFICERS BETWEEN UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT AND THE
COLLEGE DEAN
  • Directors of Development (DOD) report to the
    Associate Vice President for University
    Development (AVP) in the Office of University
    Advancement (UA) with a dotted line to their
    respective Dean.
  • Fundraising priorities are defined by the Dean
    and focus on strategic planning and fundraising
    for college-based projects. The AVP works with
    the DOD to establish fundraising strategies and
    tactics, as well as ensures coordination with the
    Prospect Management System. The AVP and the Dean
    work together with the DOD to establish
    strategies to accomplish fundraising goals.
  • The college Dean provides input into the DODs
    performance evaluation, which is conducted by the
    AVP.

5
MANAGEMENT MATRIX THE MANAGEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
OFFICERS BETWEEN UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT AND THE
COLLEGE DEAN
  • The DOD is housed in the College and has office
    space in or near the Office of the Dean.
  • The DODs salary will be paid by University
    Advancement.
  • The College provides clerical support for the
    DOD.
  • University Advancement provides budget to cover
    meals, special events, travel, recognition costs,
    and any other expenses associated with the
    cultivation and solicitation of major gift
    prospects and goals outlined in the fundraising
    plan.

6
MANAGEMENT MATRIX THE MANAGEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
OFFICERS BETWEEN UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT AND THE
COLLEGE DEAN
  • Evaluation and Return on Investment
  • This position will be evaluated based on the
    fundraising activity for the priorities
    determined by the college Dean and AVP during
    each fiscal year in accordance with the standard
    Management Personnel Plan (MPP) evaluations.
  • Development officer performance is specifically
    based on the following five criteria
  • Total dollars/gifts raised
  • Total number of Reports of Contact submitted
  • Quality of cultivation practices, stewardship
    practices, and general progress toward funds
    raised
  • Quality of work plan
  • Ability to implement work plan

7
MANAGEMENT MATRIX THE MANAGEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
OFFICERS BETWEEN UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT AND THE
COLLEGE DEAN
  • Evaluation and Return on Investment (continued)
  • Within the first 18 months the new DOD, at a
    minimum, will generate funds equivalent to
    his/her own salary, although these funds will not
    be applied for this purpose, but exactly as
    designated by donors.
  • In following years, the expectation is a
    geometric increase in fundraising activity for
    the projects determined by the college Dean.

8
Anatomy of the Annual College Fundraising Plan
  • The Written Fundraising Plan
  • Environmental Scan
  • Listing of Principal fundraising goals and
    objectives for the College to be achieved during
    the year
  • Listing of Primary donor prospects assigned to
    the College/DOD to be solicited in order to
    achieve Colleges priority fundraising objectives
    for the year
  • Budget Request

9
Evaluation Process
10
The Approximate Annual Planning/Process Calendar
  • By approximately March 15 Dean and DOD begin
    the planning process, which is determined each
    year by the individual goal.
  • By March 31 Dean and DOD are in agreement
    regarding a fundraising goal for the upcoming
    fiscal year.
  • By April 30 The DOD has submitted to the Dean a
    draft fundraising plan for the college for the
    upcoming fiscal year.
  • By approximately May 15 Dean and DOD reach
    final agreement on an overall fundraising
    objective for the college, fundraising priorities
    and DOD plan to reach goal. Plan draft is
    submitted to AVP for review and feedback.

11
The Approximate Annual Planning/Process Calendar
  • By June 1 AVP returns critiqued plan to Dean
    and DOD along with comments, questions,
    recommendations for considerations, etc.
  • By approximately June 21 Draft approved by AVP,
    Dean and DOD is submitted to Provost and/or
    President for review and final approval.
  • By approximately July 10 College fundraising
    plan approved by President and/or Provost or
    returned to Dean for re-drafting, editing,
    approval, etc.
  • By July 31 Dean, AVP and DOD sign
    fully-approved plan

12
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COLLEGE ANNUAL PLAN
  • The DOD is accountable for the implementation of
    the fundraising plan, but should receive
    reasonable and planned support from both the
    Office of the Dean and University Advancement.
  • The AVP and DOD will meet on a monthly basis to
    monitor progress toward the annual college
    fundraising objectives.
  • The Dean and DOD will meet at least on a
    bi-monthly basis to track the DOD progress toward
    goal and to discuss upcoming calendars and
    strategies directly involving the Dean.
  • The AVP, Dean and DOD will meet on a quarterly
    basis to jointly evaluate the DOD progress toward
    achieving the college annual fundraising goals.
  • The Vice President for University Advancement may
    intervene in any college fundraising process that
    either falls or remains off-track to reach an
    annual objective after the fiscal year passes the
    half-way mark (December 31).
  • In March of each year, a critique process begins
    for the years planning process and progress
    toward goal.

13
Anatomy of a Report of Contact
  • Next to dollars raised, the quantity and quality
    of Reports of Contact submitted by a director of
    development is perhaps the very best indication
    of his/her level of fundraising activity,
    planning and strategizing. The ROC is also an
    important tool in organizing such planning,
    activity and strategies. Ideally, the ROC process
    blends perfectly with the prospect management
    system, and that system is utilized to organize
    and implement the next steps necessitated by the
    meeting that is being captured in the report.
  • Report of Contact Components
  • Contact Date Date Contact was made with donor
  • Responsible Person Person filing the report
  • Date Report Submitted
  • Meeting Location (place/phone, etc.)
  • Expenses incurred Amount spent to complete
    cultivation effort
  • Was the contact Casual or Planned?
  • Meeting initiated by?
  • Information Presented to Prospect
  • Prospects Response to Presentation
  • Observations
  • Next Step Target Date

14
The Next Step The Life Blood of the Prospect
Management System
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17


Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com