Chapter 3 The Science of Astronomy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 3 The Science of Astronomy

Description:

But this made it difficult to explain the apparent retrograde motion of planets... More distant planets orbit the Sun at slower average speeds, obeying the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:169
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: mark814
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 3 The Science of Astronomy


1
Chapter 3The Science of Astronomy
2
What is Science?A system of acquiring knowledge
  • Observe
  • Predict
  • Explain
  • TEST

Why? How?
Fact - something true Hypothesis - proposed
explanation Law - a rule or relationship Model -
a representation of nature that can explain and
predict Theory - a thoroughly tested model of
nature
3
Ancient Greek Science
  • Greeks were the first people known to make models
    of nature.
  • They tried to explain patterns in nature without
    resorting to myth or the supernatural.

Greek geocentric model (c. 400 B.C.)
4
But this made it difficult to explain the
apparent retrograde motion of planets
Over a period of 10 weeks, Mars appears to stop,
back up, then go forward again.
5
The most sophisticated geocentric model was that
of Ptolemy (A.D. 100170) the Ptolemaic model
  • Sufficiently accurate to remain in use for 1,500
    years
  • Arabic translation of Ptolemys work named
    Almagest (the greatest compilation)

Ptolemy
6
So how does the Ptolemaic model explain
retrograde motion? Planets really do go backward
in this model.
epicycle
deferent
Ptolemaic Model
7
What have we learned?
  • Why does modern science trace its roots to the
    Greeks?
  • They developed models of nature and emphasized
    that the predictions of models should agree with
    observations.
  • How did the Greeks explain planetary motion?
  • The Ptolemaic model had each planet move on a
    small circle whose center moves around Earth on a
    larger circle.

8
Nicolaus Copernicus
Copernicus (14731543)
  • He proposed the Sun-centered model (published
    1543).
  • He used the model to determine the layout of the
    solar system (planetary distances in AU).

But . . .
  • The model was no more accurate than Ptolemaic
    model in predicting planetary positions, because
    it still used perfect circles.

9
Tycho Brahe (15461601)
  • Lots of data!
  • Brahe compiled the most accurate (one arcminute)
    naked eye measurements ever made of planetary
    positions.
  • He still could not detect stellar parallax, and
    thus still thought Earth must be at the center of
    the solar system (but recognized that other
    planets go around Sun). The Earth is not moving!
  • He hired Kepler, who used Tychos observations to
    discover the nature of planetary motion.

10
Differences in the geocentric and heliocentric
(Sun-centered) models
  • Earth is stationary in the geocentric model but
    moves around the Sun in heliocentric model.
  • Retrograde motion is real (planets really go
    backward) in geocentric model but only apparent
    (planets dont really turn around) in
    Sun-centered model.
  • Stellar parallax is expected in the heliocentric
    model but not in the Earth-centered model.
  • The geocentric and early heliocentric models had
    almost the same accuracy for predicting planetary
    positions in the sky.

11
Johannes Kepler (15711630)
  • Kepler succeeded Tycho as Imperial Mathematician
    to the Austrian Emperor
  • Kepler first tried to match Tychos observations
    with circular orbits.
  • But an 8-arcminute discrepancy led him eventually
    to ellipses and his 3 Laws of Planetary Motion
  • 1627 published the Rudolphine Tables predicting
    planetary positions
  • Died in 1630, a year before his prediction of a
    transit of Mercury occurred.
  • www.kepler.arc.nasa.gov/johannes.html

If I had believed that we could ignore these
eight minutes of arc, I would have patched up
my hypothesis accordingly. But, since it was not
permissible to ignore, those eight minutes
pointed the road to a complete reformation in
astronomy.
12
What is an ellipse?
An ellipse looks like an elongated
circle.
13
Eccentricity of an Ellipse
Eccentricity and Semimajor Axis of an Ellipse
14
What are Keplers three laws of planetary motion?
Keplers First Law The orbit of each planet
around the Sun is an ellipse with the Sun at one
focus.
15
Keplers Second Law As a planet moves around its
orbit, it sweeps out equal areas in equal times.
This means that a planet travels faster when it
is nearer to the Sun and slower when it is
farther from the Sun.
Closer faster!
16
Keplers Third Law
More distant planets orbit the Sun at slower
average speeds, obeying the relationship
p2 a3 p orbital
period in years a average distance from
Sun in AU
17
Graphical version of Keplers Third Law
Closer faster
18
Thought Question
An asteroid orbits the Sun at an average distance
a 4 AU. How long does it take to orbit the Sun?
  • 4 years
  • 8 years
  • 16 years
  • 64 years
  • (Hint Remember that p2 a3.)

19
An asteroid orbits the Sun at an average distance
a 4 AU. How long does it take to orbit the
Sun?
Thought Question
  • 4 years
  • 8 years
  • 16 years
  • 64 years
  • We need to find p so that p2 a3.
  • Since a 4, a3 43 64.
  • Therefore p 8, p2 82 64.

20
How did Galileo solidify the Copernican
revolution?
Galileo (15641642) overcame major objections to
the Copernican view. Three key objections rooted
in the Aristotelian view were
  • Earth could not be moving because objects in air
    would be left behind.
  • Noncircular orbits are not perfect as heavens
    should be.
  • If Earth were really orbiting Sun,wed detect
    stellar parallax.

21
Overcoming the first objection (nature of
motion)
Galileos experiments showed that objects in air
would stay with a moving Earth.
  • Aristotle thought that all objects naturally come
    to rest.
  • Galileo showed that objects will stay in motion
    unlessa force acts to slow them down (Newtons
    first law of motion).

22
Overcoming the second objection (heavenly
perfection)
  • Tychos observations of comet and supernova
    already challenged this idea.
  • Using his telescope, Galileo saw
  • Sunspots on Sun (imperfections)
  • Mountains and valleys on the Moon (proving it is
    not a perfect sphere)

23
Overcoming the third objection (parallax)
  • Tycho thought he had measured stellar distances,
    so lack of parallax seemed to rule out an
    orbiting Earth.
  • Galileo showed stars must be much farther than
    Tycho thoughtin part by using his telescope to
    see that the Milky Way is countless individual
    stars.
  • If stars were much farther away, then lack of
    detectable parallax was no longer so troubling.

24
Galileo also saw four moons orbiting Jupiter,
proving that not all objects orbit Earth.
25
Galileos observations of phases of Venus proved
that it orbits the Sun and not Earth.
26
What is Science?
  • Defining science can be surprisingly difficult.
  • Science comes from the Latin scientia, meaning
    knowledge.
  • But not all knowledge comes from science.

27
  • The idealized scientific method
  • Based on proposing and testing hypotheses
  • hypothesis educated guess

28
But science rarely proceeds in this idealized
way. For example
  • Sometimes we start by just looking then coming
    up with possible explanations.
  • Sometimes we follow our intuition rather than a
    particular line of evidence. Science can be an
    art.

29
Hallmarks of Science
  • Modern science seeks explanations for observed
    phenomena that rely solely on natural causes.
  • Science progresses through the creation and
    testing of models of nature that explain the
    observations as simply as possible.
  • A scientific model must make testable predictions
    about natural phenomena that would force us to
    revise or abandon the model if the predictions do
    not agree with observations.

30
What is a scientific theory?
  • The word theory has a different meaning in
    science than in everyday life.
  • In science, a theory is NOT the same as a
    hypothesis.
  • A scientific theory must
  • Explain a wide variety of observations with a few
    simple principles
  • Be supported by a large, compelling body of
    evidence
  • NOT have failed any crucial test of its validity
  • Be open to the possibility of being wrong

31
Was Ptolemy a good scientist?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com