FAB CE Feasibility Study

1

• FAB CE Feasibility Study
• Background
• FAB CE Internal Stakeholder Workshop
• Prague, 05 March 2008

2
From CEATS to FAB
CEATS
FAB CE
CEATS COMMON UNDERSTANDING March 2007

• Distributed model
• EUROCONTROL not service provider
• EUROCONTROL Project Manager/Facilitator

• CCG decisions
• Decided on Common Understanding at CCG
• Decided on FAB CE Feasibility Study
• Decided on Project Charter, established FAB CE
  Steering Group in April 2007 and tasked FAB SG to
  report with the FAB CE FS Master Plan

3
Current FAB Initiatives
NUAC
UKIRELAND
FAB Europe Central
FAB Central Europe
SEE FABA Danube (BUL ROM)
PortugalSpain
BLUE MED
4
FAB CE - Stakeholders
The FAB CE Feasibility Study stakeholders are

• 7 participating States, their ANSPs and their
  staff, MIL ATS providers.
• Airspace users (including MIL)
• EUROCONTROL as a facilitator and programme
  manager (through CSPDU, CRDS, CMO and HQ support)

SL
Italy as an observer in the FAB SG
5
Objectives
Safety
Maintain and if possible increase the level of
safety
Increased capacity to meet the demand from the
traffic without additional delays
Capacity
Efficiency
Increase cost effectiveness and operational
efficiency
Be one of the leading FABs in Europe in terms of
Safety, Service, Cost effectiveness,
Environmental sustainability and Customer
satisfaction. Meet and reflect the spirit of the
SES regulation Be the vehicle to achieve SESAR
targeted benefits, in this area
6
Scope Goals
OPS WG Airspace design capacity enhancement,
concepts CIV/MIL Goal identify ATM operational
opportunities for the FAB(s) in the region
SAF WG Safety case and SMS Roadmap Goal ensure
that existing high levels of safety are
maintained or increased in FABCE

ILR WG Legal / regulatory / institutional Goal
define FAB structure legal institutional
framework for ANSP and regulatory cooperation in
the FABCE
TECH WG Tech systems CNS / ATM infra and
services Goal define options for pragmatic
feasible technical solutions to support FAB CE
FAB CE Feasibility Study
FIN WG Cost Benefit/FIN cooperation Goal
provide a CBA/ economic cooperation / a charging
regime. Identify benefits.
HR WG HR Social impact Communication Buy
in Goal assess social impact/ HR early
involvement/ harmonize principles of work
conditions
7
FAB CE FS Organisation
CEATS COORDINATION GROUP

• Feasibility Study Key Milestones
• FS Kick off 26 April 07
• End of FS 29 February 08
• CCG 28 March 08

FAB SG
Project Management Office
ILRWGLI L R WG
HRWGL HRWG
FINWGL FIN WG
SAFWGL SAFWG
OPSWGL O P S WG
TECWGL TE CWG
8
FAB CE FS Main Deliverables
FAB CE Master Plan
FAB Safety Case
Cost Benefit Analyses
OPS WG
FIN WG
TEC WG
HR WG
SAF WG
ILR WG
9
FAB Development Process
OPS WG AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY
OPERATIONAL CONCEPTDOCUMENTVolume II
OPERATIONAL CONCEPTDOCUMENTVolume I
Assumptions 1. Airspace (7States) 2. Route
Network (RNDSG 2010) 3. Common understanding
OPS Scenarios
Sector Families
Sector Groups
Initial Airspace Design
constraints
WG2
TEC WG
WG3
CBA
FIN WG
WG4
HR WG
WG5
ILR WG
SAF WG
SAF CASE
WG6
FAB Scenarios
Master Plan
Master Plan
TIME
10

• Thank you for your attention!