Geen diatitel

1
Contralateral Comparison Between a Blue Light and
a Non-Blue-Light Filtering IOL
Khiun Tjia, MD Isala Clinics Zwolle the
Netherlands
The author has no financial interest in the
presentation material
2
Methods
12 contralaterally implanted subjects AcrySof
Single Piece IOL Model SA60AT AcrySof Natural
IOL Model SN60AT 2 year follow up from 2nd eye
implant Snellen Visual Acuity
3
Contrast Sensitivity
CST 1800 DIGITAL Contrast Sensitivity View-in
Tester Vision Sciences Research Corporation
4
Contrast Sensitivity

• Intra individual comparison
• Photopic and mesopic conditions
• Students T test

5
Colour Vision
Farnsworth Munsell 100 hue test Sign Test
6
Visual Acuity and Color Vision
Visual Acuity
Color Vision (Total Error Score)
SN60AT
20/32
36
SA60AT
20/35
42
No differences between the SN60AT and the SA60AT
P 0.12
7
Photopic Contrast Sensitivity
Mean Contrast Sensitivity
3
6
12
18
1.5
Spatial Frequency (cpd)
No differences between the SN60AT and the SA60AT
8
Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity

Mean Contrast Sensitivity
3
6
12
18
1.5
Spatial Frequency (cpd)
No differences between the SN60AT and the SA60AT
P 0.04
9
Conclusion

• Contralateral Comparison between
• Acrysof Natural SN 60
• Acrysof clear SA 60
• No clinical differences
• Visual Acuity
• Color Perception
• Contrast Sensitivity (Photopic or Mesopic)

in
10
Conclusion
Patients receiving the AcrySof Natural IOL
maintain all the benefits of the AcrySof
Single-Piece IOL platform with the added benefit
of Increased potential retinal protection