Title: The evolution of cooperation
1The evolution of cooperation
2Altruism and the selfish gene
- Altruism benefit b to recipient at cost -c to
the donor -
3Altruism and the selfish gene
- Altruism benefit b to recipient at cost -c to
the donor - get the altruism out of altruism... (Trivers)
4Altruism and the selfish gene
- Altruism benefit b to recipient at cost -c to
the donor - get the altruism out of altruism... (Trivers)
- kin selection
- Hamiltons rule clt b.r
5Altruism and the selfish gene
- Altruism benefit b to recipient at cost -c to
the donor - get the altruism out of altruism... (Trivers)
- kin selection
- Hamiltons rule clt b.r
- in humans co-operation among non-relatives
6Darwin
- The small strength and speed of man, his want of
natural weapons, etc., are more than
counterbalanced ... by his social qualities,
which led him to give and receive aid from his
fellow men.
7Cooperation among non-relatives
-
- Direct reciprocation and the Prisoners Dilemma
- Indirect reciprocation
- Public Goods
8 - Consequently, theories of evolution which, in
accordance with the philosophies inspiring them,
consider the mind as emerging from the forces of
living matter, or as a mere epiphenomenon of this
matter, are incompatible with the truth about
man. Nor are they able to ground the dignity of
the person.
9 10Reciprocity
- Reciprocal altruism...the trading of altruistic
acts in which benefit is larger than cost, so
that over a period of time both parties enjoy a
net gain. - (Trivers)
11The Prisoners Dilemma game
- To cooperate or to defect
- (example cooperate means to give a gift of value
b at cost -c)
12Prisoners Dilemma
13Prisoners Dilemma
14The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
- probability w for another round
- (for instance, toss a coin, stop game if 6)
- shadow of the future (Axelrod)
15The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
16The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
17The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
18The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
19The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
20The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
21The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
22The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
23The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
24(No Transcript)
25The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
- Generous Tit For Tat
- p close to 1
- q sizeable
- two zones
26The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
27The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
28The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
- Heteroclinic network
- A Tit or Tat
- B Firm But Fair
- C Bully
- D AllD
29The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
30The iterated Prisoners Dilemma
31Pavlov
- Cooperate if other player used same move as
yourself in previous round - reinforcement principle repeat former move after
high payoff - Pavlov is error-correcting
- Pavlov is stable
- Pavlov cannot invade population of defectors
32Pavlov
33Pavlov
34Pavlov
35Pavlov
- Simple learning rule
- stable, error-correcting
- but needs retaliator to prepare the ground
36Indirect reciprocity
- few rounds, as donor or receiver
- never with the same partner twice
37Indirect reciprocity
- R. Alexander
- Indirect reciprocity .. involves reputation and
status, and results in everyone in the group
continually being assessed and reassessed. -
38Indirect reciprocity
- R. Alexander
- Indirect reciprocity .. involves reputation and
status, and results in everyone in the group
continually being assessed and reassessed. - Cooperation channelled towards cooperative members
39Indirect reciprocity
- score increases by 1 if help is given, decreases
by 1 if help is withheld - score 0 at birth
-
40Indirect reciprocity
- score increases by 1 if help is given, decreases
by 1 if help is withheld - score 0 at birth
- strategy k give only if recipient has score at
least k - kgt5 always defect
- klt-5 always help
41Indirect reciprocity
42Indirect reciprocity
43Indirect reciprocity
- cooperation based on discrimination
- but not stable (can occasionally break down)
44Indirect reciprocity
45Indirect Reciprocity
46William D. Hamilton
- The theory of many-person games may
- seem to stand to that of two-person games
- in the relation
- of sea-sickness to a head-ache!