Title: The Evolution of Federalism
1The Evolution of Federalism
2Defining Federalism
- Federalism
- Constitutional arrangement whereby power is
distributed between a central government and
subdivisional governments called states in the
United States. The national and the
subdivisional governments exercise direct
authority over individuals
Look, the American people dont want to be
bossed around by federal bureaucrats. They want
to be bossed around by state bureaucrats
3Advantages of Federalism
- Federalism allows for experimentation/diversity
- Multiple levels of government provide flexibility
- Citizens can choose where to live
- Citizens have many ways to influence their govt
- Provides additional checks balances
4Disadvantages of Federalism
- The complexity of the federal system
- Larger bureaucracy/duplication
- Coordination confusion
- Slow to respond to crisis
- Complex tax system
- Federalism is expensive
- Potential for inequality in services policies
5Versions of Federalism
Dual Federalism (Layer Cake Federalism) Views the
Constitution as giving a limited list of powers
to the national government, leaving the rest to
sovereign states
- Cooperative Federalism (Marble Cake Federalism)
- Federalism as a cooperative system of
intergovernmental relations in delivering goods
and services to the people - As the colors are mixed in a marble cake, so
functions are mixed in the American federal
system.
6The Significance of the 10th Amendment
- The powers not delegated to the United States by
the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the
States, are reserved to the States respectively,
or to the people. - The 10th Amendment was seen as a reservoir of
reserved powers for state governments
- However, its rarely had much significance since
McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819 - The doctrine of implied national powers, and the
necessary and proper clause have undercut the
words and apparent intent of the 10th Amendment
7Why Divide Authority in the First Place?
- The Constitution may have never been ratified if
the Framers had pushed for a unitary system - Federalism was a compromise, allowing the states
to maintain their independence - Why?
- Prevent tyranny
- Provision for increased participation
- Uses states for experimentation for new
policies/programs
8(No Transcript)
9The Evolution of Federalism
- State-Centered Federalism
- 1787 to 1868
- From the adoption of the Constitution to the end
of the Civil War, the states were the most
important units of the American Federal System - McCulloch v. Maryland decided during this phase
- Construes necessary and proper to favor
expansion of national authority
10McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Doctrine of Implied National Powers
- It determined that Congress had not only the
powers expressly conferred upon it by the
Constitution but also all authority appropriate
to carry out such powers
Doctrine of National Supremacy
- The national supremacy principle states that all
federal laws (including the Constitution itself)
are superior to any conflicting state or local
laws, such that the federal laws will always take
precedence.
11Evolution of Federalism
- Doctrine of Nullification
- Each state could declare any laws or actions of
the national government null and void (ruled
unconstitutional) - Doctrine of Secession
- States could chose to withdraw from the United
States if they wanted - Used by the Confederate States in the Civil War
12The Evolution of Federalism
- Dual Federalism
- 1868 to 1913
- In this phase, the national government narrowly
interpreted its delegated powers and the states
continued to decide most domestic policy issues.
Believed the national government shouldnt exceed
enumerated powers
13Evolution of Federalism
- After the Civil War, industrialization and
urbanization created new challenges for the
federal system
14The Evolution of American Federalism
Cooperative Federalism 1913 to 1964
- The system was likened to a marble cake in that
as the colors are mixed in a marble cake, so
functions are mixed in the American federal
system.
15Cooperative Federalism 1913-1964
- New Deal centralized response to national
crisis, become nationally-based welfare state - Many social programs remain under state control
- Congress controls commerce leading up to and
during WWII
16The Evolution of American Federalism
Centralized or Creative Federalism 1964-1980
- The presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969)
marked a critical point in the evolution of
federalism - Federal government clearly had its own national
goals
17The Great Society and Creative Federalism
- Johnsons Great Society
- War on Poverty
- Civil Rights Acts
- Federal funds were directed to states, local
government, and a wide variety of social programs
18The Great Society and Creative Federalism
19The Great Society and Creative Federalism
20New Federalism
- Ronald Reagan sought to return more power and
responsibility to the states - Block grants and revenue sharing reduce federal
requirements - Government is not the solution its the
problem - -Ronald Reagan
21Devolution (Beginning in 1995)
- The Republican Contract with America called for
devolution-- the transfer of political and
economic power to the states (with decreased
federal funding) - 1996 Welfare Reform devolved the program to
states
22The Supreme Courts Shift in Perspective
- Beginning in 1995, justices interested in
granting more deference to state authority gained
a slim five-to-four majority in the Supreme Court -
- The Constitutional Counterrevolution
- A return to an older version of federalism not
embraced since the constitutional crisis over the
New Deal in the 1930s - United States v. Lopez (1995)
- Printz v. United States (1997)
- United States v. Morrison (2000)
23The Changing Nature of Federal Grants
- In 1996 there was a shift from Categorical Grants
to Block Grants - 2 types of Categorical Grants (Grants-in-Aid)
- Formula grants
- Project grants
- Block Grants (Revenue-sharing Grants)
- Far more flexible
24The Changing Nature of Federal Grants
- Grants-in-Aid
- Federal funds given to state and local
governments on the condition that the money be
spent for specified purposes, defined by
officials in Washington
Such funds are usually accompanied by
requirements and standards set by the governing
body for how they are to be spent. An example of
this would be how the United States Congress
required states to raise the drinking age for
alcohol from 18 to 21 in order for the individual
states to continue to qualify for federal funds
for interstate highways located within each state.
25The Future of Federalism
- The persistence of international terrorism, the
war in Afghanistan, and rising deficits all
ensure a substantial role for the national
government in the years to come
26The Future of Federalism
- TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program)
- Health Care Law
- No Child Left Behind
27No Child Left Behind Example
- Problem declining student performance
- Solution federal funding requires tough
performance standards - Unintended consequences localities forced to
make huge investment to implement testing
requirements - Localities sue states--gt unfunded mandate
- States opting out of federal funds ( performance
standards)