Title: MH-17: Victory in Europe
1MH-17 Victory in Europe
2Victory In Europe- Strategic Overview
- Germanys Leadership armys quality/quantity
decline - Logistics re-supply almost non-existent
- By contrast- Allied capability tactical/Ops
skills rise - Quantity in all areas even more superior
- Logistics, resources industrial capacity
unmatched - Overall cumulative impact gt wear Germans down
- Air War during 1944 (Feb-May) gt Allied
victory - Allies forcefully defeat Luftwaffe gt
- Achieve air superiority interdict German
Logistics - At the same time Allied air protects its Logistics
3Allied Advances- Strategic Overview
- Sea Control established (in addition to air
superiority) - Amphibious landing at Normandy successful
- Infantry advance (once established) unstoppable
- Break-out from beachhead soon followed
- Logistic/re-supply uninterrupted (Air Navy
protect) - Intel collect, analysis, deception superior
exploited - Joint/combined military coordination much
improved gt - Especially between Anglo/American forces
- Although rivalries continue to exists example?
- East West advance on Both fronts gt
- Squeeze Germany ever more in the middle
- Actual penetration of Germanys borders
approaching - June 44 Russians cross into greater Germany from
the East - March 45 Western Allies cross the Rhine
4Air War US Defeat of Luftwaffe (1943-44)
- British Bomber Command attacks on Berlin
- Encounter much difficulty suffer high
casualties - US 8th 15th Air Force attack deep inside
Germany - Fighter escort provided by long range P-51s
- US target focus of raids (Feb-May44) gt
- German Aircraft industry
- Battle of attrition ensues
- Both sides suffer high causalities
5Results of Strategic Bombing Raids
- Raids fail to achieve objective
- Stop Germanys fighter product
- German fighter production actually increases
- But quality of fighter declines
- Also forced to close other A/C production lines
- German Air Defense (Night Fighters) weakens
- Suffer high casualties gt Defense becomes
unsustainable - By May44 US owned the sky over Germany at night
6Air Support for Operation Overlord
- Battlefield preparation
- By Aprilgt Operation Overlord was ready
- Air Marshall Tedder the scientists Solly
Zuckermann designed a plan to isolate Normandy - Planning preparation Aims
- Maintain secret logistic build-up preparation
- How? (Essential pre-condition to success of
landings?) - Essential pre-condition to success of landings
- In addition to tactical surprise through
effective OPSEC - Air Superiority throughout Channel area gtwhy?
- Allow allies to establish ?______________________
(How?) - Through ?______________ of enemy aircraft
attempting to fly in
7Airmen Attitude Toward Overlord
- Airmen attitude toward plan for Overlord Air
support? - Air Marshall Harris?
- ?______________- attempts to exploit Political
concern of Fr civilian casualties - Ironic (given his outspoken support for area
bombing) - General Spaatz?
- Prefers to continue strikes on ?___________with
shift to ?_____________ - Ikes Tedders response?
- ?______________
- POL interdiction of enemy transportation system
- Zuckermans analysis addressing Harris
objections? - Failed to take current ?______________
__________results now in effect - Airman eventually fell in line
- Transportation infrastructure interdiction
successful - Air contribution key to allied victory in France
- Denied Germany its re-supply re-enforcement
capability
8Allied POL offensive
- Luftwaffe staff also concludes their POL is a
good allied target - May44 8th AF attack synthetic POL plants
- Heavy allied causalities result
- But ULTRA validates POL as a credible target
- Decrypted message traffic reveals negative German
reaction - Germans redistribute air defense systems to
protect POL - Impact by late July
- German Aviation gas down by 98
- Air defense restricted no air/ground training
why? - Not enough ?______________, Aircraft and
?______________
9Western Campaign Italy (Oct 1943- June 1944)
- Allied drive stalled at Gustav Line
by late 43 - Allies attempt by-pass by amphibious
landing at Anzio - Operation Shingle
- Planning execution shortfalls
- Also missed opportunity
- Operational Objective
- Cut off German supplies
- Force Germans to withdraw
- MG Lucass hesitationgt
- Allowed Germans to shift from a vulnerable
position was soon relieved - Result allies stalled other attacks fail at
high cost in CAS until May44
10Allied Tactical Success
- 11 May Allied Offensive successful after 3 days
- Free French break-thru Gustav Line over Mountains
to east - Other penetrations soon follow
- VI Corps (w/new CMDR- MG Truscott) finally breaks
out of Anzio - Attacks German 10th Army who is forced
to withdraw to North - LTG Mark Clark orders VI corps to turn NW to
liberate Rome (5 June) - Clark thus allows 10th Army to escape
- Reason Politics, publicity, ego, and glory
- Allies continue to press Germans who withdraw
slowly North gt - Fall back in fighting withdrawal to Gothic Line
- Germans continue to resist by exploiting weather
mountainous terrain
11Normandy Invasion- Dieppe Lessons
- Bitter lessons learned at port of Dieppe
(Aug42) - Failure of British commandos Canadians teach
Allies what? - Ports normally too well defended just too hard
- Dieppes failure applied to planning for second
attempt at cross channel invasion - Invasion requires extensive planning, logistics,
OPSEC, force - Over the beach invasion at unexpected spot more
likely to succeed
12Normandy Order of Battle
- Allies 21st Army Group (Monty)
- US 1st (Bradley) Army
- Brit 2nd (Dempsey) Army
- 36 infantry 3 Airborne Divisions (2.9Million
troops) - 7000 ships, landing craft, GFS
- 12.8K aircraft (Air transport CAS)
- Germans OB West (Rundstedt)
- 7th 15th Armies
- Armor Corps (reserve)
- 58 Divisions (1.9 Million troops)
- 561 ships
- 919 Aircraft (many not operational)
13Normandy- Planning Objectives
- Plans Objectives
- Major challenge for logistics planners?
- Right mix of ammo fuel (miscalculated at onset-
how?) - Need more ?______initially and more ?______ later
during break-out - Transportation follow-on support build-up
needed - Operational Priorities Considerations
- Essential to secure initial foot hold
- Secure foot hold needed for subsequent
breakthrough attempt - Protect build-up by screening German response
- Who is tasked to ensure above is accomplished?
- 82nd 101st Airborne Divisions
- German Defensive Strategy (disunity over
tactics) - 1. Rommel stop Allies at beaches (static forward
defense) - 2. Rundstedt mobile defense (inflict high
causalities) - Concentrate on main allied thrust
- What factors would affect all of above the most?
14Friction, Battlefield Prep, Execution
- Friction
- Factors affecting both sides
during landing include - Weather affects of tactical
surprisegt in turn all impact - Landing, CAS, ABN ops
- Battlefield preparation
- Allied air interdiction gt
secure
protected zone for troop
landings - Beach landing sites
- Numerous obstacles
(courtesy of Rommel) - NCDU clearance ops (52 CAS 7 Navy Crosses)
15Execution- at 0001 on 6 June 1944
- Airborne operations commence
- Objective secure vital bridges in rear
- Link up later with amphibious force
- Para glider troops widely spread out
- 82nd 101st move to objectives at 1st light
- Pre-dawn NGF air strikes lift at 0600
- 0630 seaborne forces land across 5 beaches
- British landings go generally IAW plan
- But HQ adheres rigidly to plans timeline
- Missed opportunity to take Caen early on
- American landings
- Strong resistance met at Omaha Beach
- Arty small arms fire pin down 1st 29th ID
- By 1100 NGF make German barrages abate
- Troops cross to dunes establish footholds
- By end of D-day 155K troops landed
- Allies established firmly on Continent
16Results
- Allies establish new front
- Steadily press Germans back
- Ikes Assessment of Normandy landings later
breakthrough - Very difficult because
- Quality of German soldier
- Superior German tactical skills
- Nature of Northern France terrain
- Thick hedgerows conceal threats
- Weather (overcast skies- problem?)
- Reduced visibility for Air support CAS
- Also key lost opportunities
- British over-caution preventing early capture of
Caen on 1st day - Rigid devotion to plans timeline over-rode
tactical opportunity ground truth
17Breakout - Operation Cobra
- Allied attack concentrated on German defenses at
St. Lo - Massive Air Strike (8th AF) to soften German
defenses - Friendly fire at front line
- Infantry pay heavy costs of this advance when
bombs fall short - (LTG Lesley McNair killed by friendly air
strikes) why? - Inaccurate CAS on perpendicular run
- (Bad weather blamed in part)
- Key command changes
- Ike activates 12th Army Group (General Omar
Bradley) - 1st Army (Hodges)
- 3rd Army (Patton)
18Key Allied Penetration- Aug 1944
- Aug 1 Allies attack thru Avranches bottleneck
- Turn West to capture St. Malo, Brest, Lorient
- Operational value of these
objectives questioned - Soon ordered to turn East
toward Mortain - Hitler plans counter-attack with Kluge leading
it - Ultra alerts allies of threat to US 1st Army
- Bradley preempts Kluge attempt to cut off US 1st
- Allied airpower pound Germans throughout day
- Kluge now vulnerable to Allied encirclement
- About to be caught in Falaise Pocket-
- What happens?
- Missed opportunity
- Bradley Monty fail to coordinate close off
gap in Falaise Pocket in time - Many Germans able to escape Falaise Pocket
- 5th Panzer, 7th Army, Panzer Group Eberbach
escape to east to fight another day
19Allied Advance Toward the Rhine
- Ikes Original Plan
- Conduct supply build-up then proceed on broad
front to Seine - But with stunning allied advances on the ground
posed - Key Question becomes continue or halt?
- 1. Factors for halting allow Allies to re-supply
consolidate - 2. Factors for continuing exploit current
momentum - Next question if decision is to proceed then
how? - Two options ?_______________(original plan) or
single ?_______________ - (Who was for the latter)?
- Ikes decision (29 Aug)
- Original Plan ?_______________ front until
logistics run out - But extra weight (POL) given to 1st Army on
Northern axis - Result 21st Army Group benefits at Pattons 3rd
Armys POL expense
20Tactical Objectives Command Relations
- Tactical Situation Objectives
- 1. Monty take Antwerp drive toward Ruhr
- 2. Bradleys 12 AG is spread across the the front
of the Ardennes - Hodges drives North while Patton goes to east
Metz - Command Relationships
- 1 Sept Ike assumes command of Ground Campaign
- (Over Montys strong objections)
- Both 21st Army Group 12th Army Groups now
report to directly to Ike
21Montys Complaints Errors
- Monty continues to complain about lack
of adequate logistic support - Proposed Bradley halt divert his fuel
- But Monty missed key opportunity at Antwerp
- Opportunity to strike decisive blow go a
long way to end war - what/how? - Failed to secure Scheldt water way for enabling
use of Antwerp as re-supply port - Significance of this key missed opportunity-?
- Logistics base to supply Allied advance
- Monty advanced to Belgium captured Brussels on
3 Sept 44 - 4 Sept Montys 11th Armor Div seized Antwerp in
tact - Monty s failure to take Scheldt at Antwerp
allowed 15th Army to escape to east delay
opening of forward resupply port at Antwerp - Monty was focused on what upcoming operation
employing a single thrust across Rhine?
22Operation Market-Garden- Order of Battle
- Tactical Sit OOB
- Market (Air) 3 1/2 Corps
- 82nd, 101st, Poles 1st para, British 1st
ABN - Aircraft glider force
- Garden (Ground)
- XXX Corps misc. support
- German Forces
- 11 SS Panzer Corps
- Just redeployed to Arnhem
- 9th SS Panzer Division
- 10th SS Panzer Division
- Students 1st Parachute Army
- 15th Army (recently escaped from Holland)
23 Plans Objectives
- Strategic Operational Objectives
- 1. Shock Germany already on ropes
out of war - 2. Conduct powerful strike into heart of Germany,
then proceed to Ruhr Valley - Tactical Objectives
- Airborne forces secure key bridges to facilitate
XXX corps strike - 1. Eindhoven Bridge over lower canal
- 2. Son Bridge over Wilhelmina Canal
- 3. Veghel Bridge over Zuit Willems Canal
- 4. Graves Bridge over Maas (Meuse)
- 5. Nijmegen Bridge over Waal river
- 6. Arnhem Bridge over lower Rhine
24 Concept of Operations
- Mission
- Market conduct airborne assault
into Germany - Secure 8 Bridge heads over 3
rivers 4 canals until relieved - Garden XXX Corps (LTG Horrocks) conduct thrust
across lower Rhine - Relieve airborne forces within 2-3 days
- Battlefield preparation
- Intelligence analysis
- LTG Browning (I ABN Corps) ignored panzers
reported around Arnhem by his G-2 - General attitude dont rock boat
- Monty threw caution to wind
- Over optimism as momentum for op builds
25Airborne Targets Execution
Graves
Nijmegen
Son
26Execution (Arnhem) Intel Friction
- Brit 1st ABN dropped 6 miles from the objective
(Bad aircrew advice) - Frictions role Murphys law ran against Allies
- Panzer SS Army soon arrived with superior fire
power - Made holding key bridge by lightly armed airborne
troops at Arnhem until relieved by
XXX Corps highly unrealistic - XXX Corps 64 mile transit to ETA at Arnhem
underestimated - 36 hour delay taking Nijmegen precluded timely
arrival relief - Lt Col Frosts DSO citation describes his
Battalions actions at Arnhem best
27 Results Analysis
- Tactical defeat at a high cost
- Sacrifice of good troops
- 8000 out of 10,000 of 1ABN Div
- Little to show for it (morale)
- Severe consequences of over optimistic Cmdrs
ignoring Ultra, Photos HUMIT - LTG Browning summed it up best
- Arnhem was A Bridge too far
28Collapse of GermanyAir contribution 3 prongs
- 1. AM Tedders stressed unified focused
campaign - Objective German Transportation system
- 2. AM Harriss objections
- Insisted strategic bombing of cities the best
objective - Agreed to use Rail system as Aiming point
compromise - 3. Gen Spaatz argued for POL targets as primary
- Transportation as secondary targets
- Result Steady then rapid decline of German
transport system - Distribution of coal cut off from rest of Germany
- No means of transporting out of Ruhr Valley
29Battle of the Bulge- Order of Battle
- Background
- Impact of successful air campaign
- Logistics POL cut off by allied air
- Germanys industrial economy collapsing
- Forces desperate measures
- Hitlers big gamble Surprise counter-offensive
- Order of Battle
- Army Group B (FM Model) gt
- 500K troops armor
- 5th 6th Panzer Army 7th Army
- US 12th Army Group (Gen Bradley)
- 655K troops, armor, air support
- US 1st 3rd Armies
- 82nd 101st ABN as strategic reserve
30Plans Objectives Wacht am Rhein
- Strategic, Operational, tactical Objectives
- 1. Antwerp split allies capture key allied
re-supply point - 2. Capture fuel dumps to allow advance (!)
- Concept of Operations (Map)
- Battlefield preparation
- Concentration behind Ardennes forest (extreme
OPSEC) - SOF invade behind US frontlines
- Capture key choke points
- Spread confusion in allied rear
Dietrich
Manteuffel
Brandenberger
31 Execution
- Germans achieve operational tactical surprise
- Initial tactical success with mixed results
later - Strong initial US resistance at weak points delay
German advance - Eisenborn Ridge, St. Vith, later- Bastogne
- Isolated units perform heroically
- Allies dont panic counter-attack effectively
- Allied cooperation superb well coordinated
- 101st hold Bastogne
- BG McAuliffe Nuts to surrender
- Pattons 3rd Army relieves Bastogne
32 Offensive Stalls Bulge Results
- Germans halted well short of objectives
- Most forward SS Panzer units are cut off from
their LOCs - Weather clears- allied air attacks
- Germans lose the tactical operational
initiative - Just one column of 5th PZ reaches Meuse at Dinant
(eve of 24 Dec) - Allied air ground soon force
German retreat - By mid-Jan Allies push line back
- German casualties 100K
- Strategic impact No more Reserves
- Allied casualties 82K (15K POWs)
33Germany- Collapse in the East
- Soviets launch two offenses during same period
- 1st Belorussian 1st Ukrainian Fronts gt
- Breakthrough between Warsaw Carpathian
mountains - Central portion of Eastern Front
- In the North gt 2nd 3rd Belorussian Fronts
attack gt - East Prussia Pomerania
34The Hitler Factor
- Factors hindering German Commanders
- Hitlers interference with Operational decisions
gt - Create confusion undermine Ground Commanders
initiative - Results in disaster for Germans Forces
- Germans become rapidly overrun surrounded
- Survivors scramble West in desperate retreat
- Soviets invade exact harsh revenge on Germans
35Germany- Collapse in the West (Jan-Feb 1945)
- Germanys defenses unravel at rapid pace
- Pattons 3rd Army Hodges 1st race east to
Rhine - Soon cross Rhine into Germany
- Monty finally is ready
- Breaks thru in North
- Combines w/American advance south of Ruhr
- Germanys situation becomes hopeless
36Final Collapse
- By April 1, 1945
- Models Army Group B encircled within Ruhr
- Only scattered pickets of Nazi fanatics left to
oppose advance - German troops surrender in droves
- Soviet forces press toward allies w/German in
middle - 25 April Soviets US units toast each other on
Elbe - Germany is now cut in half with no where to go
- 30 April Hitler commits suicide as Russian press
in - WWII in Europe is over
37WWII Assessment
- Germany simply out manned and outgunned
- More significantly out supplied (logistics)
- Fighting major industrial or more populous foes
- (US, Britain, USSR)
- US could out produce all combined
- Allied Airgt destroys Ger. transport system by
late44 - Germany war economy simply collapsed
- w/o POL gt Luftwaffe cant fly tanks cant move
- No tactical or operational mobility to fight
- Allied s overwhelm Germans on both East West
fronts - Hitler compounded problems by rudder orders
from rear - His tactical, operational, strategic direction
made bad sit. worse - Esp. by refusal to allow Cmdrs to withdraw soon
to be encircled - Hitler contributed much to their Armys
destruction - NTL gt Hitlers iron will forces fight to bitter
end
38WWII Assessment- 2
- Wehrmachts tactical/op skills prevail in early
years - But soongt German leadership tactical/op skills
decline - In contrast, allies leaders, Op/Tactical skills
improve - Allies learn hard bitter lessons well
- All above surpassed by allied s logistic
superiority - Allied firepower industrial capacity only grows
w/time - Allied integration of infantry, tanks, arty air
excellent - Impact extends allied power projection
capability - Makes invasion at Normandy breakthrough
possible - Momentum gathers makes drive to Germany
unstoppable
39WWII Assessment- 3
- Joint-combined ops very effective under Ikes
leadership - Excellent coalition builder as supreme allied
commander - Allied Intel (Ultra) effective deception ploys
- Exploited German mistakes to seize opportunities
- Pattons paper army in London concern to OKW
- Impact tied down German Reserves during invasion
- Gave false indication of allied landing at
Calais - Costs of WWII- in addition to soldiers
- WWII killed 10s of millions of innocent people
- 50-60 million died great material damage
inflicted - Also set stage for 45 more years of Cold War
40(No Transcript)
41Back-up Slides
42Breakout - Operation Cobra
- Allied attack concentrated on German defenses at
St. Lo - Massive Air Strike (8th AF) to soften German
defenses - Friendly fire at front line
- Infantry pay heavy costs of this advance
- (LTG Lesley McNair killed by friendly air
strikes) why? - Inaccurate CAS
- (Bad weather blamed in part)
- Key command change
- Ike activates 12th Army Group (General Omar
Bradley) - 1st Army (Hodges)
- 3rd Army (Patton)