Title: PHARMACY UPDATE TRAINING COURSE
1PHARMACY UPDATE TRAINING COURSE
2- NHS Act 1977 (as amended)
- The NHS (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations
2005 S.I. 2005 No. 614 as amended by S.I. 2005
No.1015 - Guidance Information for Primary Care Trusts
(Control of Entry)
3PCTS PHARMACEUTICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT
4The Application Form
- No longer a prescribed form
- Annex D and Para 3.6 to the Guidance
- Power to set a date for applications each month
- Power to invite applications Para 3.19
5CHECKING THE APPLICATION
- status of applicant see Para 3.23
- reject if
- not pharmacist or
- a partnership which does not consist wholly of
pharmacists or - a company which does not comply with S71 of
Medicines Act 1968
6FULL APPLICATIONS
7PROCESSING A FULL APPLICATIONconsultations
Reg. 23 and Para 3.92
- LPC, LMC, Patients Forum, any person on the
pharmaceutical list who might be significantly
affected, LPS providers - neighbouring PCTs within 2 kilometres of the
premises - any other patient, consumer or community groups.
8TIME LIMITS
- response to be within 45 days from date
notification sent or such longer period as the
PCT may allow. - gives right to be notified of decision
- gives right of appealN.B. Check date
neighbouring PCT sent out consultation letter.
9Considering the Applications
- Hearing applications together
- Should there be an oral hearing see reg. 24
- Confidential information
- Fitness to practice and information provided
10The Principles of Natural Justice and The
Human Rights Act 1998
11THE DECISION...
12WHAT CAN BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT?
- Pharmaceutical services and LPS in the
neighbourhood - Reg 12(2)(a) - Reasonable choice for recipients of services and
persons Reg 12(2)(b) - Any relevant information - Reg 12(2)(c)
- Any information received as part of the
consultation procedure Reg 12(2)(d) - Other proposed services Reg 12(3)
13REGULATION 12(1)
- an application...shall be granted ...only...if
it is satisfied that it is necessary or desirable
to grant the application in order to secure, in
the neighbourhood in which the premises from
which the applicant intends to provide the
services are located, the adequate provision by
persons included in a pharmaceutical list, of the
services, or some of the services specified in
the application.
14THE NEIGHBOURHOOD
15THE NEIGHBOURHOOD
- the Cooper and Anglin case (1991)
- the Bangor decision (1994)
- ex p. Suri and Gompels (1994 and 1995)
- Cribbs Causeway (1996)
- ex p. Shah and Tescos (1997)
16Is it necessary or desirable to secure adequate
services...?
- What information is needed
- How to determine adequacy
- How to structure the decision
- See guidance at para 3.90 and Annex A
17 to whom...?
- residents?
- workers? in the neighbourhood
- shoppers?
18 and when...?
- ex p. Boots (1992) (Trowbridge)
- Cribbs Causeway
- Gemini Park
- look at planning situation
- economy in the area
- the situation on the ground.
19IDENTICAL AND OVERLAPPING APPLICATIONS
- where only one pharmacy is needed
- premises
- access
- services to be provided
- hours
- choice/competition
- time of application
20Exempt applications Regs 13 to 16 and Guidance
at Para.4.1 onwards
- Pharmacies in large retail areas
- Pharmacies which intend to open for more than 100
hours a week - Consortia wishing to establish a new One Stop
Primary Care Centre - Wholly mail order or internet based pharmacy
services
21HOURS
- Paras 22 25 of Schedule 1 T of S
- Not less than 40 hours unless consent of PCT or
Sec of State. - Power to direct.
- No longer normal hours
- BUT query guidance re application form
22MINOR RELOCATIONS
23R EG 6(1)where the applicant intends to change
within the neighbourhood the premises from which
he provides pharmaceutical services, being the
same services as he intends to provide from the
new premises, and the PCT is satisfied that the
change is a minor relocation and ...the provision
of pharmaceutical services will not be
interrupted (except for such period as the PCT
may for good cause allow) the PCT shall grant
the application
24IS THE MOVE WITHIN THE NEIGHBOURHOOD?
- see ex p. Suri and Gompels.
25IS IT A SHORT DISTANCE?ARE THERE ANY BARRIERS?
- see ex p. Suri and Gompels which affirmed the
Cumbria decision
26Will the same services be provided?Will there
be any interruption?Note restrictions on further
applications
27EXEMPTION FROM TEST
- Moves which satisfy the test but are less than
500m. - See Reg. 6(3) and
- Para 3.37 to 3.40
28Minor Relocations between PCTs
- Application dealt with under Reg 7.
- Paras 3.41 onwards and Flow chart
- NB Receiving PCT checks any fitness to practise
issues
29MAJOR RELOCATIONS
30MAJOR RELOCATION
- application made under Reg 5(b)(ii)
- same test as in Reg 12
- ex p. Tesco and Sharma (1997)
31TIME FOR OPENING
- Reg. 39(2) full/minor relocation grants 6
months one or more extensions of 3 months - Reg. 40(1) preliminary consent 6 months BUT no
power to extend.
32THE APPEAL
33- Para 3.162 onwards for who has the right of
appeal in what circumstances - the Committee can determine to hear appeals
together even where the PCT has not exercised its
discretion under Reg. 24(7) - the Committee has a discretion as to whether it
holds an oral hearing
34The oral hearing
- it is by way of a complete rehearing - ex.p.
Dixon Lane Chemists Ltd (1993) - composition of the panel
- practicalities - timing, legal representation,
who may speak, the information required, the
documentation.
35The decision is that of the Pharmacy Committee,
but if the Committee is to overrule an oral
hearing panel, it must give good reasons.
36APPLICATIONS IN CONTROLLED LOCALITIES
37RURALITY
- Regulation 31 and Para 5.8 onwards - it is
for the PCT to determine whether an area is
rural in character.
38GUIDANCE
- What makes an area rural - see Paras 5.12
onwards - a visit is vital
39POINTS TO NOTE
- THE PCT HAS TO DETERMINE PRECISELY THE
BOUNDARIES OF ANY AREA OR PART OF AN AREA WHICH
IT DETERMINES TO BE RURAL IN CHARACTER Reg 31(7) - THE FIVE YEAR RULE Reg 31(11)
40RESERVED LOCATIONS
- PCT shall determine whether the premises are in a
reserved location - Number on all patient lists within 1.6kms is less
that 2750 or other factors. See para 5.45 - Do not go through the prejudice test.
- Do go through N or D test.
- If change and pop. rises then Prejudice test.
- BUT prejudice does apply to 4 exemptions
41APPLICATIONS BY PHARMACISTS
- Check previous decisions - Reg 34
- Consultations under Reg. 33.
- Should the area be a reserved location?
Calculate the number of patients is it more
than 2,750? If not are there other factors?
Right of appeal Reg. 35 - Is there prejudice? Reg. 18
- Multiply by average scripts to give idea of
scripts/money lost - How will that affect doctors income?
- Gradualisation?
-
42When can doctors dispense?
- See Reg. 60
- A patient has serious difficulty, OR
- lives in a controlled area more than 1.6kms from
pharmacy OR - lives in a controlled area within 1.6kms and is a
reserved location - AND doctor has outline consent to dispense plus
premises approval - BUT see which patients are eligible
43OUTLINE CONSENT TO DISPENSE BY DOCTORS
- Check previous decisions under Reg 34
- Reg. 62 and para 6.1 guidance.
- Who must be consulted? Reg. 33
- Reserved location determination
- SHALL refuse if there would be prejudice to the
proper provision of PMS, dispensing services, LPS
or pharmaceutical services Reg. 18
44HOW TO CALCULATE
- Burden is on party alleging prejudice
- What do the parties say?
- Problems with confidentiality
- Target income/target numbers
45Premises Approval
- Transitional provisions relating to premises for
doctor dispensing. Para 6.41 onwards. - Right of appeal
46Applications in respect of existing outline
consents
- Wish to change existing premises
- Minor relocation
- Move where pharmacy catches up
- Amalgamations
- Guidance Paras. 6.23 to 6.40 and
- Regs. 65 and 66
47PHARMACY UPDATE TRAINING COURSE