ED Patient: Innocent or complicitous victim - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 68
About This Presentation
Title:

ED Patient: Innocent or complicitous victim

Description:

No psychopathology. Extreme pathology. Apparently not clinical, sometimes somatic ... psychopathology. 4th April 2005. Crittenden & Wilkinson. 22. www.ssbu.no ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 69
Provided by: patcrit
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ED Patient: Innocent or complicitous victim


1
ED Patient Innocent or complicitous victim?
  • An exploration of
  • self-protective strategies in ED
  • PM Crittenden SR Wilkinson

2
Four Parts of Presentation
  • Overview of attachment (DMM)
  • 2. Discussion of appearance reality in ED
  • 3. Three ED examples
  • 4. Closing discussion

3
Three Aspects of Attachment
  • Inter-personal Strategies for eliciting
    protection and comfort
  • Intra-personal Information processing
  • Familial Array of interacting strategies

4
Central concepts in the Dynamic Maturational
Model of Attachment (DMM)
  • Attachment refers to self-protective processes
    used in the face of threat or danger.
  • Attachment is about HOW to protect oneself, not
    how strong the bond is.
  • Its form depends on the information available to
    the childs mind.

5
Central Concepts in the DMM, cont
  • 2. Attachment behaviour organizes into strategies
    for elicting protection and comfort (9-11 mo.)
  • 3. The array of possible strategies increases as
    the brain matures making new information and
    new actions possible (1 year-old age).

6
Attachment Models
  • Ainsworth A B C
  • Main Solomon A B C D (disorganized)
  • In practice Secure (B) versus Insecure
  • Dynamic-Maturational Model (DMM, Crittenden)

7
Ainsworth Patterns of Infant Attachment
Integration
Predictability
Negative Affect
8
Ainsworth Patterns of Infant Attachment Plus Main
Solomons Disorganized
Integration
Predictability
Negative Affect
Secure
? ? Disorganized ?
?
9
DMM Transforming Information
  • Serves a self-protective function
  • Becomes more sophisticated with maturation of
    brain
  • Appearance ? reality

10
DMM in Infancy
Integrated True Information
True Cognition
True Negative Affect
Balanced
11
Psychological Advances
  • Implicit (non-verbal) causality
  • Implicit affective states
  • Being together
  • - in temporal contingency and
  • - affective attunement

12
DMM in the Preschool Years
Integrated True Information
True Cognition
True Negative Affect
Distorted Cognition Omitted Neg. Affect
Distorted Neg. Affect Omitted Cognition
False Positive Affect
13
Psychological Advances
  • Verbal statements of what causes what
  • Words for feeling states
  • Construction of interpersonal episodes
  • Or the absence of these

14
DMM in the School Years
Integrated True Information
True Cognition
True Negative Affect
Distorted Cognition Omitted Neg. Affect
Distorted Neg. Affect Omitted Cognition
False Positive Affect
False Cognition
15
Psychological Advances
  • Why did you do that when you knew you werent
    supposed to?!!
  • Understanding the causes of ones own behavior
    Which DR regulated action?

16
DMM in Adolescence
Integrated True Information
True Cognition
True Negative Affect
Distorted Cognition Omitted Neg. Affect
Distorted Neg. Affect Omitted Cognition
Sexual desire
False Positive Affect
False Cognition
17
Psychological Advances
  • Wordless communication
  • Type A Borrowed words ideas
  • Type C Sullen wordlessness, behavioral
    communication

18
DMM in Adulthood
Integration of True Information
Cognition
Negative Affect
Distorted Cognition Omitted Neg. Affect
Distorted Neg. Affect Omitted Cognition
False Positive Affect
False Cognition
Integration of False Information
19
Strategies for Dangerous Caregivers
  • Type A
  • Do the right thing from the perspective of
    others.
  • Inhibit displays of negative affect.

20
Strategies for Non-contingent Parents
  • Type C
  • Stick to your own feelings bribe threaten.
  • Demand what you feel you need now!
  • (The future is unpredictable.)

21
DMM in Adulthood
No psychopathology
Apparently not clinical, sometimes somatic
Inexplicable troubling psychopathology
Very severe pathology
Very severe pathology
Extreme pathology
22
Strategies Representations
  • The construct of internal working models has
    been used to describe the mental component of the
    strategies employed to protect the self.
  • Dispositional representations (DRs) are a more
    accurate way of describing the interface between
    psychological functioning and behavior.

23
Dispositional Representations (DRs)
  • Network of firing neurons representing the state
    of
  • - self now
  • - context now
  • - associations with self and context in past
  • (Perception is 90 memory - Gregory)
  • DRs function to dispose self to act.

24
  • No model is stored.
  • DRs are always generated anew in the present.
  • The presence, and probability of firing, of
    synapses reflects past experience.

25
  • Parallel processing yields
  • Many different DRs
  • Each processed differently by the brain
  • Multiple solutions to each problem.

26
Types of information guiding self-protective
strategies
  • 1. Predictable consequences (Type A)
  • Understanding of causation
  • Low slow arousal ? little somatic awareness
  • Inhibition of negative affect display of false
    positive affect (fear smile)
  • Therefore temporal order of events guides DRs.

27
  • 2. Unpredictable consequences (Type C)
  • Lack of understanding of causation
  • High fast arousal
  • Use of displays of affect to elicit protection
    comfort
  • Therefore feelings guide DRs.

28
Integration
  • Integration corrects error, selects the best DR,
    constructs new and more comprehensive DRs.
  • Integration is slow.
  • Integration consumes brain resources, i.e., it
    reduces scanning for danger.
  • Integration is dangerous if danger is near.

29
Safety in the face of danger requires a fast
response at the cost accuracy of response.
Hence, exposure to danger reduces integration.
30
Peter Cook and Dudley Moore
  • Dud So would you say youve learned from your
    mistakes?
  • Pete Oh yes, Im sure I could repeat them
    exactly.

31
Defining Crazy
  • Doing again what failed every time before -
  • and expecting a different outcome this time.

32
  • Three hypotheses
  • ED girls are trying to protect themselves.
  • Parents of ED girls are trying to protect the
    girls.
  • Appearance does not equal reality.

33
Three Examples of Appearance/Reality Discrepancy
  • Ringer Crittenden findings with DMM
  • Case study from in-patient treatment
  • Case study of family process politics

34
Adult Attachment Interview
  • DMM classifications method
  • Assess strategy information processing
  • Multiple DRs assessed
  • Strategy, trauma, modifiers

35
Failure of Strategies
  • Localized, topic-specific failure of strategic
    functioning Unresolved trauma
  • Generalized, pervasive failure of strategic
    functioning Depression Disorientation
  • Punctuated, generalized pervasive failure of
    strategy with imaginary intrusions
    Disorganization

36
Questions
  • Are ED patients strategic?
  • What strategies do they use?
  • What transformations of information are needed
    and why?
  • Do different symptoms presentations differ by
    strategy transformation?

37
Ringer Sample
  • 19 Anorectics (restricting)
  • 26 Bulimics
  • 17 Anorectics (binging)

38
Ringer Crittenden Results
  • Limited engagement with interviewer, few episodes
  • Several strategies used by EDs
  • No difference by type of ED
  • Strategies not unique to ED

39
Common DMM strategies for ED
  • C5-6
  • C3-4 (bulimic)
  • A1/C5-6
  • A C5-6 (false A1)
  • A3-4
  • (Ringer Crittenden)

40
Ringer Crittenden Results, Cont
  • Few Utr most imagined (erroneous causation)
  • Almost no modifiers very strategic (not Dp)

41
Transformations
  • Exaggerated affect
  • Non-verbal communication
  • Strategy employed without regard to outcomes
  • Strategy can be used self-destructively without
    regard to results

42
Psychological Strategic Effects Deception
  • Adol and family both focus on what can be said or
    talked about (displacement of problems).
  • This misleads everyone. It isnt lying, but it
    deceives the self and others.

43
Why use deception?
  • Parents perspective
  • To protect the child from bad stuff
  • To protect the parent from bad stuff
  • Because they dont know how to fix the bad stuff.

44
Why use deception?
  • Adolescents perspective
  • To avoid losing contact with a protective parent
  • To communicate with the skills that one has.

45
Deception Scale
  • Lie
  • Intentional deception
  • Self-deception
  • Involving self-deception
  • Reciprocal involving self-deception
  • Reciprocal, involving, intentional self- and
    other-deception

46
Familial Processes
Two cases of ED adolescents parents -
Exploration of AAIs - In-patient clinical
experience.
47
Truth in ED Families
  • Parents have past dangers with current traumatic
    effects.
  • Parents have current problems (e.g., marital
    discord).
  • Parents try to protect their children from these
    by hiding them.

48
A Developmental Perspective on Truth
  • Truth about the past is not predictive truth.
  • The brain is evolved to use information to
    predict the future.

49
The only information that we have is information
about the pastwhereasThe only information
that we need is information about the future.
50
Consequently, information from the past must be
transformed to maximally predict danger in the
future.
51
Five Transformations of Information
  • Truly predictive (things are as they appear).
  • Erroneous (things have no meaning, but they
    appear to, trust them)
  • Omitted (important things appear irrelevant,
    forget them)
  • Distorted (things appear, but must be minimized
    or exaggerated to fit the future)
  • Falsely predictive (things mean the opposite of
    what they appear to mean).

52
Discovery of truth by pre-ED baby
  • Infancy
  • M is caring baby wants her.
  • M is sometimes unavailable or upset B gets
    anxiously upset.
  • M gets more upset when B gets upset.
  • Outcomes B wants M, cant predict Ms behavior,
    inhibits angry feelings but is aroused.

53
Psychological Strategic Effects
  • Causal information is omitted.
  • Affect is exaggerated.
  • Child is Type C2-4 and maybe also idealizing of M
    (A1/C2-4)

54
Discovery of truth by pre-ED child
  • Preschool
  • M is caring child wants her.
  • M is sometimes unavailable or upset child tries
    to talk about it, but M wont tell this story.
  • M is most comforting when child needs help.
  • Outcomes Child wants M, doesnt understand
    causation, doesnt learn language of feeling,
    cant tell episodes of difficulties, learns to
    appear helpless.

55
Psychological Strategic Effects
  • Language does not replace affect for
    communication so information is not explicit.
  • Angry feelings are hidden from view so anger is
    not experienced or expressed explicitly.
  • Child becomes excessively dependent on M for
    comfort and well-being.

56
Discovery of truth by pre-ED child
  • School-age
  • M is caring child wants her- so child hides her
    anger.
  • Child feels bad acts different from peers, has
    few friends, but cant explain why.
  • Child finds erroneous causal explanations.
  • Outcomes Child wants M, is angry but acts meek,
    creates erroneous explanations, cant use
    language to solve problems. M tries harder to
    help, worries, but cant talk about bad stuff.

57
Psychological Strategic Effects
  • Lacking words, episodes, and a dialogue, child
    does not learn to reflect integratively on self,
    feelings, and behavior
  • False explanations and distorted feelings are
    generated by child and accepted with relief by
    parents.
  • Everyone thinks life is hunky-dory. It is not.

58
Discovery of truth by ED adolescent
  • Secondary school
  • M is worried Adolescent uses passive aggression
  • Adolescent feels hopeless, becomes sullen (if
    words dont function, why use them?)
  • Adolescent cant become independent, doesnt want
    to leave, but cant stay
  • M doesnt understand, tries to help, makes it
    worse
  • Outcomes Adolescent becomes symptomatic, hides
    symptoms, misunderstands causal relations.

59
Psychological Strategic EffectsIgnorance and
Incompetence
  • Adolescent is in an internal struggle lacks the
    mental skills to resolve it.
  • Adolescent is in an interpersonal struggle and
    lacks the social communicative skills to
    resolve it.
  • Adolescent does not know and cannot tell about
    the true issues nor can the family.

60
Psychological Strategic Effects Deception
  • Adolescent and family both focus on what can be
    said or talked about (displacement of problems).
  • This misleads everyone. It isnt lying, but it
    deceives the self and others.

61
Macro-system processesTerri Schiavo case
  • Adolescent bulimia, quick marriage
  • Black hole of desperation (family follows her to
    FL)
  • Triangulated struggle between Terri, husband, her
    family (as if she had a lover!)
  • Recurrence of bulimia, heart attack, brain
    damage

62
Terri Sciavo, cont
  • Imagined processes (right to life)
  • Obscured issues (family struggle Terris
    adulthood)
  • Unexpected outcomes at all levels (government
    becomes part of family mental illness and
    displaced struggle)
  • Unexpected effects of media attention to ED
    increase prevalence of this symptom display in
    troubled youth?

63
Psychological Strategic EffectsThe Breaking
Point
  • By adolescence, everything is at stake
  • - self-identity
  • - understanding causality feelings
  • - personal independence
  • - future family reproduction.
  • The struggle to survive the struggles becomes
    itself a death struggle with phantom problems.

64
In the eating disorders, the struggle to survive
the obscured family struggles becomes itself a
death struggle around phantom problems.
Appearance no longer resembles reality.
65
Treatment
  • Therapist (T) needs a mental model of ED.
  • T needs to discover the specifics of the ED
    patient her parents.
  • T needs to know own strategy (usually Utr, often
    A3, sometimes C3-6, some earned B).
  • As and Cs usually need different intervention
    strategies

66
Treatment, cont
  • Establish safety patient, parents, staff.
  • Be open explicit, not entrapped.
  • In parallel,
  • (1) increase skills of ED patient and family
  • (2) open family secrets to view safely.
  • Avoid moral judgment this is about safety
    comfort.

67
Three central ideas
  • Patients and parents use protective strategies.
  • That have unexpected outcomes.
  • That lack and verbal integrating processes.
  • A C require different approaches.
  • Trauma is not central.
  • Developmental pathways and dispositional
    representations are.

68
To contact us
  • pmcrittenden_at_att.net or www.patcrittenden.com
  • simonroger.wilkinson_at_uus.no
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com