Title: Health and Safety Executive
1Health and SafetyExecutive
- Human Factors
- in Accident
- Investigation
- David Birkbeck
- HID Onshore Human
- Organisational Factors Group
2Human Factors in Accident Investigation
- David Birkbeck
- HID Onshore Human Organisational Factors Group
3Introduction
- To say accidents are due to human failing is
like saying falls are due to gravity. It is true
but it does not help us prevent them Trevor
Kletz - Aim today is to present methods that are known to
help identify human failure in accident
investigation and prevent reoccurrence - Not a black art, a pragmatic and robust process
4What we expect
- Methodical process for gathering information,
analysing what went wrong (and right), and
learning lessons in order to - Manage risk
- Prevent reoccurrence
- Retrospective tool, but can be powerful in
promoting change
5Accident reports
- What happened
- Who to
- When
- How it happened
- But not why
- Technical myopia
- Failure to consider human factors
6Significance of human factors
- Up to 90 of accidents attributable to some
degree to human failures - ...Texas CityBuncefield... Texaco Milford Haven
... Southall and Ladbroke Grove crashes
...Zeebruger - Proportion and significance increasing as
technical safety measures improve
7Recent news
8But not as simple as we think..
- This accident was the result of human error
- ..pilot error
- Error or rule-breaking put down to
- Lack of competence
- Poor supervision
- Not paying attention
- Its not usually as simple as that!
9Human failure taxonomy
Human failures
Unintended actions
Intended actions
Errors - Unintended consequences
Violation - Intended consequences
Mistakes
Lapses
Slips
When the person decided to act without complying
with a known rule or procedure
When the person forgets to do something
When the person does something, but not what they
meant to do
When the person does what they meant to, but
should have done something else
10Slip, lapse or mistake?
Involuntary or non-intentional action
No
Was there intention in the action?
Was there prior intention to act?
No
Spontaneous or subsidiary action
Yes
Yes
Did the actions proceed as planned?
Unintentional action (slip or lapse)
No
Yes
Did the actions achieve their desired end?
Intentional but mistaken action
No
Yes
Successful action
11How to apply
- Create timeline
- Identify significant behaviours
- Analyse behaviours
- Identify effective measures to prevent
reoccurrence - Record
12Errors
- Slip
- When a person does something, but not what they
meant to do - Lapse
- When a person forgets to do something
- Both are unintended actions with unintended
consequences
13Example slip Emirates EK407
- Emirates Flight EK407
- Pre-flight take off calculations were based on an
incorrect take off weight (262M/t rather than
362M/t) - This weight was entered into take off performance
software on separate laptop - Captain noticed something was wrong at the end of
the runway, took manual control and selected
maximum thrust
14Example slip Emirates EK407
15Example slip Emirates EK407
- After the accident, Captain and First Office were
asked to resign by Emirates and did so - ATSB investigation revealed
- Captain had flown 99 hours in last month (1 hour
below maximum) - Had slept for 3.5 hours in 24 hour period prior
to flight (shift rotas) - Excessively complex system for calculating take
off speed (manual transfer of information from 2
automated systems) - No automated failsafe
16Mistakes
- When a person does something they intended to do,
but should have done something else - Rule based choosing a standard solution for a
known problem the maintenance worker who
selects the wrong isolation procedures - Knowledge based working from first principles
3 Mile Island shift team dismissed a potential
explanation for the unfolding incident as they
believed a valve was closed
17Mistakes
- Because the action is intended, mistakes are much
harder to detect at the individual level - People believe what they are doing is right and
often dismiss evidence to the contrary - Bias
- Tunnel vision
18Violations
- The Texas City technicians who filled the
raffinate splitter to 90-100 capacity rather
than 50 as stated in procedures - The Assistant Boson who was asleep rather than
checking the bow doors were closed on the Herald
of Free Enterprise - The technicians who knowingly maintained the
Chernobyl reactor in an unsafe state to allow a
safety study to be conducted
19Violations
- Violation
- When a person decides to act without complying
with a known rule or procedure - Note that, in this context, there must be an
known rule or procedure - This is not a moral or ethical judgement
20Violations
21Violations
- Note that we all integrate rule violation into
our day to day lives so the identification of a
violation should not be regarded as a precursor
to discipline - Indeed, we tend to like those who break the rules
22Violations
23Violations
- Types of violations
- Routine
- Exceptional
- Acts of sabotage
- The key to the effective analysis of violations
is to understand why - What antecedents were present?
- What behaviour was observed?
- What consequences resulted?
24Performance Influencing Factors
- Defined as the characteristics of the job, the
individual and the organization that influence
behaviour - Considered during behavioural analysis, often at
the end of the process - Very broad topic including a range of factors
e.g. fatigue, group effects, design of equipment,
mental wellbeing, task knowledge/complexity - A comprehensive list available on HSE website
- Often have a critical role in error causation but
equally often overlooked (e.g. fatigue EK407)
25Performance Influencing Factors
- Can profoundly influence potential for error
(proposed nominal human unreliability). Task is - Routine, highly practiced, rapid task involving
relatively low level of skill (0.02) - Miscellaneous task for which no description can
be found (0.03) - Fairly simple task performed rapidly or given
scant attention (0.09) - Totally unfamiliar, performed at speed with no
real idea of consequence (0.55) - Williams, J.C. HEART Technique
26Common issues
- Failure to correctly specify behaviour
- The individual involved
- The task they were engaged in at the time
- What they did (or did not do)
- What the outcome was
- Making early decisions and sticking to them
- As information becomes available, a mistake can
become a violation - Failure to identify the multiple behaviours
contributing to an accident or incident - Timeline critical
27Why bother with any of it?
- Each failure type has a different set of
solutions designed to prevent their reoccurrence.
For example (not exhaustive) - Slip/Lapse
- NOT training
- Hardware solutions
- Cross checks
- PIFs
- Error
- Training e.g. scenarios
- Group support
- Challenge
- Violations
- Behaviour modification
- Culture improvement
28What to remember
- Human behaviour can be predicted with reasonable
accuracy - Correctly integrating HF into your accident
investigation process will reap rewards just
look at the contemporary causation figures - Separating error, mistake and violation
represents a highly valuable first step - Help is out there
- Guidance
- HSE
- Industry working groups e.g. Energy Institute
29A final thought
- The most powerful influence on human behaviour is
outcome - Therefore managing human failure requires a high
degree of corporate honesty - What behaviour is really rewarded?
- Are we willing to look at organizational factors,
especially when we see rule breaking? - Are we willing to make the investments that are
likely to prevent reoccurrence? - Are we willing to strive for objectivity and
pragmatism?
30Sources of guidance
- Reducing Error Influencing Behaviour HSG 48
- Investigating Incidents Accidents HSG 245
- Successful Health Safety management HSG 65
- Human Factors Website pages
- http//www.hse.gov.uk/humanfactors/majorhazard/ind
ex.htm - Energy Institute guidance
- http//www.energyinst.org.uk/index.cfm?PageID1268