Title: Psychology 331 Social Psychology
1Psychology 331Social Psychology
2Prejudice
- Clark Clark (1947)
- Conclusions
- Children understand racial difference
- Children preferred the white doll
- 1/3 of children rejected their own group
affiliation
3How pervasive is prejudice?
- Less blatant, but still widespread
- Measures of subtle prejudice
- Bogus pipeline
- IAT Implicit Association Test
- www.yale.edu/implicit
4Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination
- Prejudice
- The Affective Component
- A hostile or negative attitude toward a
distinguishable group or people, based solely on
their membership in that group.
5Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination
- Stereotyping
- The Cognitive Component
- A generalization about a group of people in which
identical characteristics are assigned to
virtually all members of the group, regardless of
actual variation among the members. - Allports (1954) law of least effort
stereotypes simplify a complex world
6Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination
- Discrimination
- The Behavioral Component
- An unjustified negative or harmful action towards
a member of a group, simply because of his or her
membership in that group. - Bond (1988)
7What Causes Prejudice?
- Cognitive Sources
- Emotional Sources
- Social Sources
8Cognitive Sources of Prejudice
- Social Categorization and Social Identity Theory
Us vs Them - Ingroup Bias
- Tendency to favor ones own group
- Minimal Group Paradigm (Tajfel)
- Ingroup bias leads to self-esteem maintenance and
enhancement
9Cognitive Sources of Prejudice
- Social Categorization and Social Identity Theory
Us vs Them - Outgroup Homogeneity Bias
- The perception that those in the outgroup are
more similar to each other than they really are - Quattrone Jones (1980) Rutgers vs Princeton
study
10Cognitive Sources of Prejudice
- The Activation of Stereotypes
- Automatic and controlled information processing
(Devine, 1989) - Stereotypes are automatic
- Low prejudice decide not to use them
11Cognitive Sources of Prejudice
- Illusory Correlation
- Tendency to see relationships, or correlations,
between events that are actually unrelated - Hamilton Gifford (1976)
12Cognitive Sources of Prejudice
- Dispositional vs Situational Explanations
- Grouping-Serving Bias
- Explaining away outgroup members positive
behaviors and attributing negative behaviors to
their dispositions - Bodenhausen (1988)
- Also called Ultimate Attribution Error
13Cognitive Sources of Prejudice
- Dispositional vs Situational Explanations
- Blaming the Victim
- Blame individuals for their victimization
- Janoff-Bulman et al. (1985) rape study
14Cognitive Sources of Prejudice
- Dispositional vs Situational Explanations
- Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
- We find proof for our stereotypes by behaving in
a way to create stereotypical behavior in
outgroup members - Word, Zanna, Cooper (1974)
- Interview studies
15Cognitive Sources of Prejudice
- Dispositional vs Situational Explanations
- Stereotype Threat
- Apprehension experienced by members of a minority
group that they may behave in a manner that
confirms an existing stereotype of their group - Steele Aronson (1995) Blacks intelligence
- Spencer Steele (1995) Women math
- Also called stereotype vulnerability
16Cognitive Sources of Prejudice
- What can you do if you experience discrimination?
- Individual Mobility
- Social Creativity
- Social Competition
17Cognitive Sources of Prejudice
- Revising Stereotypical Beliefs
- Bookkeeping model
- Each piece leads to small change
- Conversion model
- Strong piece leads to radical change
- Subtyping model
- Subgroups are created
18Emotional Sources of Prejudice
- The Way We Allocate Resources Realistic
Conflict Theory - Limited resources lead to conflict between
groups, and result in increased prejudice and
discrimination - Four Theories
19Emotional Sources of Prejudice
- The Way We Allocate Resources
- Economic and Political Competition
- Holvand Sears (1940)
- Price of cotton and lynchings
- Sherif et al. (1961)
- Robbers Cave experiment
20Emotional Sources of Prejudice
- The Way We Allocate Resources
- Role of the Scapegoat
- Tendency for individuals, when frustrated or
unhappy, to displace aggression onto groups that
are disliked, visible, and relatively powerless - Rogers Prentice-Dunn (1981)
21Emotional Sources of Prejudice
- The Way We Allocate Resources
- Frustration-Aggression Theory
- Prejudice as displaced aggression caused by the
frustrations of life - Relative Deprivation Theory
- People become discontented when they perceive a
negative discrepancy between their current
standard of living and the standard of living
they believe they deserve.
22Emotional Sources of Prejudice
- Authoritarian Personality
- Someone extremely respectful to and obeying of
authority figures and conventional moral standard
but hostile towards deviants and outsiders
23Social Sources of Prejudice
- Social Learning Theory
- Institutionalized Racism
- Institutionalized Sexism
24Social Sources of Prejudice
- Belief Congruence
- Perception that others hold different beliefs
25Social Sources of Prejudice
- Conformity
- Tendency to go along with the group in order to
fulfill their expectations and gain acceptance - Pettigrew (1958) miners study
26How Can We Reduce Prejudice?
- The Contact Hypothesis
- Bringing members of different groups together
will reduce prejudice - Deutsch Collins (1951)
- Housing study
27When does contact reduce prejudice? (Allport,
1954)
- Six conditions are necessary
- Mutual interdependence
- Successful completion of a common goal
- Equal status of group members
- Having informal interpersonal contact
- Having multiple contacts with several members of
the outgroup - Social norms that promote equality
28How Can We Reduce Prejudice?
- Cooperation and Interdependence
- Stephen (1978)
- Aronsons Jigsaw Classroom
- Gaertner et al. (1990)
29How Can We Reduce Prejudice?
- But we develop stereotypes about groups with
which we have had little or no contact!
30How Can We Reduce Prejudice?
- Influence of Consensus Information
- Individuals stereotypes develop and change
according to their perceptions about the beliefs
of other people - Sechrist Stangor (2001)
- Consensus information changes intergroup
attitudes and behavior
31Sechrist Stangor (2001)
- Pre-selected Participants as High and Low
Prejudice - Received High or Low Consensus Information
- High Consensus 81 of students agree
- Low Consensus 19 of students agree
- Assessed Behavior (seating distance)
- Completed Attitude Measure
32Mean Seating Distance Between Participants and
Target
33Mean Attitude Ratings (Higher numbers indicate
more favorable attitudes)