Microfinance: Theory and Practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Microfinance: Theory and Practice

Description:

Microfinance: Theory and Practice Beatriz Armendariz Littauer 323 Lecture 1: Overview Microfinance: formal financial institutions delivering credit & other ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:617
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: BeatrizAR4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Microfinance: Theory and Practice


1
Microfinance Theory and Practice
Beatriz Armendariz Littauer 323
Lecture 1 Overview
2
Microfinance formal financial institutions
delivering credit other financial services to
poor individuals without collateral
  • Salient features
  • Technology credit delivery often attributed to
    Muhammad Yunus (Peace Nobel Prize 2006)
  • Main idea group lending under joint
    responsibility (GLJR) ? High repayment rates at
    affordable interest rates)
  • Idea has been widely analyzed theoretically
  • GLJR circumvents adverse Selection, moral
    hazard, and enforcement ? lower than usurious
    interest rates

3
GLJR rooted in
  • ROSCAs
  • Informal credit arrangements among individuals
    acting both as lenders and borrowers. Defaults
    averted under the threat of social sanctions
  • 19th Century Credit Unions
  • Villagers that are linked by a common bond
    and where the threat of stigma or social
    sanctions prevents individuals from defaulting

4
Main innovations introduced by Yunus in 1977 and
parallel efforts in Latin America
  • 1) Foreign savings mobilized
  • a) via donations from charities and
    multilateral organizations,
  • b) via private entrepreneurs in recent trends
    pertaining for-profit microfinance institutions,
    and
  • c) via social business or socially
    responsible investments

5
  • 2) Strong biased in favor of women for two
    reasons
  • a) Donors standpoint women are the main
    brokers of health and education empowerment
    concerns, and gender equity concerns (in line
    with the millennium development goals (MDGs).
  • (Pitt and Khandker (1998 JPE article in your
    syllabus) have helped to reinforce this view
  • Consumption increases by 18 taka for every 100
    taka lent to women and only 11 taka for every
    100 taka lent to men
  • b) Microfinance enterprises standpoint women
    are more conservative in their investment
    behavior, have no access to other sources of
    credit, among others

6
Recent research, however, shows that
  • GLJR under the threat of social and bank
    sanctions is not the only way to ensure high
    repayment rates.
  • In particular
  • Under individual loan contracts, a
    non-refinancing threat may suffice
  • All forms of collateral (precious to the
    borrowers more than to the lenders) can be
    equally effective
  • Public repayments can be imposed as a way to
    insure that social sanctions are effective
  • And this has in turn popularized microfinance in
    sparsely populated areas. Eg., Eastern Europe
    and Latin America
  • d) Aside for an under-provision of savings and
    basic insurance, microfinance is not
    under-serving farmers in most developing
    countries, not even now (commodity prices crisis)

7
Managerial Issues
  • Microfinance enterprises struggle to meet a dual
    objective of alleviating poverty on the one hand
    and attaining self-sustainability on the other
  • Conflicting objectives have often led a number of
    practitioners to bias their managerial skill
    formation in favor of one
  • Managerial skills in microfinance also change
    across regions Asia versus Latin America, for
    example
  • Some researchers and practitioners would argue
    that microfinance should move away completely
    from dual objective .
  • Some even suggest that the core poor qualify for
    grants not loans. (PROGRESA/OPORTUNIDADES, for
    example
  • Over-emphasizing self-sustainability and growth
    has its dangers, however.

8
Let us now turn to the issue of subsidies (next
class in greater detail)
  • Ever since microfinance was invented, most NGOs
    and for-profit institutions have benefited from
    subsidies because social objectives
  • However, critics would argue that such subsidies
    are either detrimental or not needed because
    (among other things)
  • Microfinance enterprises can easily attain self
    sustainability and make profits
  • Competition among microfinance entrepreneurs will
    prevent for-profit institutions to charge
    astronomical interest rates
  • A way to tone-down the anti-subsidy critics is
    the idea of smart subsidies
  • Infant industry argument? Skill acquisition?
    Poverty alleviation? ? Next class

9
Other exceedingly important challenges
  • Based on growth estimates, heavily subsidized
    microfinance remains at its infancy
  • Far less than expected households have benefitted
    from microfinance products
  • Not necessarily the core poor
  • 3) Microsavings and microinsurance still
    exceedingly small
  • Potential mismatch between what microfinance
    institutions offer and what the potential clients
    would wish
  • 4) Regulation
  • Interest rates
  • -? Next Class Armendariz Morduch (2005)
    Chapter 1 Rethinking Banking
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com