Principles of Good Tax Policy

1
Principles of Good Tax Policy

• Annette NellenSan José State University

2
Presentation Overview

• Purpose of the statement
• Overview to the 10 principles
• Examples of application of the 10 principles

3
Tax Policy Concept Statement 1

• Guiding Principles of Good Tax Policy A
  Framework for Evaluating Tax Proposals
• product of the policy, legislation
  simplification committee
• created as preliminary step to analyzing tax
  reform proposals
• but - also useful for analyzing any tax proposal
  - any size, any degree, any level
• basically - Adam Smiths tenets 6 more

4
Purpose of the Framework

• To answer the question
• How should proposals to change existing tax
  rules be analyzed?
• To be short and to the point.
• To be a prelude to series of addl tax policy
  papers.

5
Equity Fairness

• Similarly situated taxpayers should be taxed
  similarly.

• Horizontal and vertical equity.
• Fairness (or really, the perception of
  fairness).
• Should really look at entire range of taxes a
  taxpayer is subject to.

6
Certainty

• Tax rules should specify when the tax is to be
  paid, how it is to be paid, and how the amount to
  be paid is to be determined.
• Certainty, rather than ambiguity.
• Ability to determine tax base and rate.
• Basically, the level of confidence that exists
  that the tax is being calculated correctly.

7
Convenience of Payment

• A tax should be due at a time or in a manner that
  is most likely to be convenient for the taxpayer.
• Helps ensure compliance.
• Appropriate payment mechanism depends on amount
  of liability and ease of collection.

8
Economy of Collection

• The costs to collect a tax should be kept to a
  minimum for both the government and taxpayers.
• How many revenue officers are needed?
• Closely related to simplicity principle.

9
Simplicity

• The tax law should be simple so that taxpayers
  can understand the rules and comply with them
  correctly and in a cost-efficient manner.
• Reduces the amount of errors.
• Increases respect for the system.
• Enables taxpayers to understand tax consequences
  of their transactions.

10
Neutrality

• The effect of the tax law on a taxpayers
  decisions as to how to carry out a particular
  transaction or whether to engage in a transaction
  should be kept to a minimum.
• Taxpayers should not be unduly encouraged or
  discouraged from engaging in certain activities
  due to tax law.
• Primary purpose of tax system is to raise
  revenue, not change behavior.

11
Economic Growth Efficiency

• The tax system should not impede or reduce the
  productive capacity of the economy.
• Tax system should be aligned with the economic
  goals of the jurisdiction imposing the tax.
• For example, should be aligned with
  jurisdictions economic goals for economic
  growth, capital formation and intl
  competitiveness.
• Should not favor one industry or type of
  investment at the expense of others.

12
Transparency Visibility

• Taxpayers should know that a tax exists and how
  and when it is imposed upon them and others.
• Enables taxpayers to know the true cost of
  transactions.
• Enables taxpayers to know when tax is being
  assessed or paid and to whom.

13
Minimum Tax Gap

• A tax should be structured to minimize
  noncompliance.
• Tax gap amount owed less amount collected.
• Procedural rules needed to attain compliance.
• Generally, is a need to strike a balance between
  (a) desired level of compliance and (b) costs of
  enforcement and the level of intrusiveness of the
  tax system.

14
Appropriate Government Revenues

• The tax system should enable the government to
  determine how much tax revenue will likely be
  collected and when.
• Need to have some level of predictability and
  reliability to enable governments to know how
  much will be collected and when.
• Generally, government realizes better stability
  with a mix of taxes.

15
Challenges

• Desire to use the tax law for more than raising
  revenue.
• Frequent changes to the tax laws.
• Not all ten principles can be achieved to same
  degree for all proposed changes - need to strike
  a balance though.

16
Example Armey Flat Tax

• Mostly meets
• Certainty
• Convenience of payment
• Economy of collection
• Simplicity
• Minimum tax gap

• Needs work
• Equity fairness
• Neutrality
• Economic growth and efficiency
• Transparency
• Appropriate government revenues

17
Example Charitable deduction for non-itemizers

• Problem areas
• Equity (how are taxable income and ability to pay
  to be measured?)
• Certainty (more recordkeeping)
• Simplicity (not as simple as just taking the
  standard deduction)
• Neutrality (tax law would encourage donations)
• Minimum tax gap (many might believe they should
  claim something)

• No problem with
• Convenience of payment
• Transparency
• Appropriate government revenues

18
Example SUT and E-commerce

• Equity
• Internet vendors and Main Street really are not
  similarly situated, so should compliance rules
  apply similarly?
• Possible solutions
• require Main Street retailer to charge SUT based
  on where customer lives
• use origin approach
• compensate vendors
• third party collector funded by government
• use a different form of consumption tax which
  consumer computes

19
Example SUT and E-commerce

• Certainty, Economy in Collection, Simplicity
• 6000 taxing jurisdictions creates uncertainty
  complexity
• Possible solutions
• uniform rules among jurisdictions streamlined
  system
• third party collection
• better use of technology
• federal level tax as a replacement (a VAT?)

20
Example SUT and E-commerce

• Neutrality, Minimum Tax Gap, Appropriate
  Government Revenues
• if SUT not charged by seller and state doesnt
  enforce use tax, neutrality is not achieved
• Possible solutions
• educate consumers about use tax
• simplify and unify rules
• improved use of technology
• replace SUT with an easier consumption tax

21
Questions?Comments?