Title: Structure of the Federal Court System
1Structure of the Federal Court System
Core Court Structure
2Party and Presidential Court Appointments
3Impact of Justices Beliefs
4Partisanship and Court Appointments
5Marbury v. Madison The Players
The Election of 1800
Adams, Federalist incumbent
Jefferson, Democratic challenger
- Result Federalists lose the presidency and lose
their majorities in both the Senate and the House
of Representatives. --The Federalists are wiped
out. - What is the Federalists last resort?
6Marbury v. Madison
After the election. . .
Judicial Branch
Adams, outgoing president
Jefferson, president-elect
Marshall, New Chief Justice ofthe Supreme Court
Marshall, Federalist Sec. of State
Marshall, Unofficial presidential helper
but BEFORE Jefferson and the Democrats take
control (November, 1800 to March, 1801).
Marbury, Federalist Judicial Official
7Marbury v. Madison
Jefferson is sworn in. . .
Judicial Branch
Oops.
Adams, outgoing president
Jefferson, President
Marshall, New Chief Justice ofthe Supreme Court
Sorry, your commission has been cancelled. . .
Were outta here. . .
Secretary of State is to deliver commissions
Marshall, Unofficial presidential helper
Madison, Democratic Sec. of State
Wheres my bloody appointment??
Marbury, Federalist Judicial Official
8Marbury v. Madison
Jefferson is sworn in. . .
Judicial Branch
Uhhh. . .
If you help your Federalist crony, youll be
sorry.
Jefferson, President
Marshall, New Chief Justice ofthe Supreme Court
Help me, Marshall old buddy!
Madison, Democratic Sec. of State
Marbury sues Madison, asking the Supreme Court to
issue a writ of mandamus. Congress had given
the Court the authority to issue these writs
under the Judiciary Act of 1789.
Marbury, Federalist Judicial Official
9Marshalls options
- Rule on the behalf of Marbury order Madison to
deliver the appointment. - RESULT Madison would ignore the order, and the
Court would be forever weakened - Rule on the behalf of Madison deny Marbury the
appointment, even in the face of the Judiciary
Act of 1789 - RESULT The Court would obviously be knuckling
under to the the Executive Branchforever
weakening the Court.
10Marshalls Decision
- Although Marbury is right on the merits of the
case (under the law, he does have a right to the
appointment), the Court cannot rule on the case
because the Judiciary Act of 1789 is
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. - Congress could not pass a law that gave the
Supreme Court MORE POWER (like issuing writs of
mandamus) than the Constitution gives the Court.
Therefore, the Judiciary Act of 1789 is not
valid. - Marbury v. Madison gave the Court the power of
judicial review. - The Court claimed this power for itselfit is not
granted anywhere in the Constitution.
Return
11State and Federal Laws Struck Down by the Court
1790 - 2000 Return
12Granting the Courts Powers. . .
- Article. III, Section. 1.
- The judicial Power of the United States, shall
be vested in one supreme Court, and in such
inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to
time ordain and establish.
Return
13Federal Circuit Courts
Return
14The Court Assisting the Trustbuster
Return
15FDR and Packing the Court
Return
16Cases that can go directly to the Supreme Court
Return
- Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 In all Cases
affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and
Consuls, and those in which a State shall be
Party, the supreme Court shall have original
Jurisdiction.
17State Courts the Federal Court System
18Clarence Gideons hand-writtenpetition for a
writ of certiorari Return