Title: Law and the American Legal System
1Law and the American Legal System
2The ever present lawEverywhere All the time
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5Everything seems to be decided by the courts
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13Federal Regulations on 'Net Neutrality' Are
Voided, Clearing Way for New Fees
- Washington 01/14/2014. A three-judge panel of
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit struck down federal rules
requiring broadband providers to treat all
Internet traffic equally. - Adopted in 2010, the Federal Communications
Commission rules said that companies like Verizon
Communications Inc. had to treat all similar
content on their networks equally, whether it was
a YouTube video or a home video posted on a
personal website.
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16Ethics, Law, and Mass Communication
- Ethics (or moral philosophy) The field
concerned with what is right and wrong behavior. - Usually divided into
- metaethics,
- normative ethics,
- and applied ethics
17Ethics
- Metaethics questions of where our ethical
principles come from (for example are they just
social inventions?) - Normative ethics prescriptions for our conduct,
the duties that we should follow - applied ethics examining specific controversial
issues for example in media ethics
18From normative ethics (morality) to law
- Ethical standards regulate behavior. They
provide basis for social rules - Ethical sanctions
- Social disapproval or social praise
- Feeling of guilt or feeling of virtue
19From ethics to law
- The argument can be stated that where ethics
(morality) is not followed, the law begins. - With perfect agreement on morality, law would not
be necessary - That agreement is impossible in diverse
communities or countries - Thus the need for law
20The Ideal
- Laws should be used minimally
- reserved only for those that do not take into
account the well being of the society. - Law as control of behavior
- ALSO
- Law as an arbiter in conflict between people,
their interests, and rights
21Conflict of interestsConflict of rights
- The right to property
- But
- The eminent domain
- The externalities (pollution)
22Conflict of interestsConflict of rights
- The right to free speech
- But
- The right to privacy
- The right to protect persons reputation
- The right to safety
- The right to fair trial
- And much more
23What is Law?
- Law is a body of rules enacted by public
officials in a legitimate manner and backed by
the force of the state - Law is a body of rules of conduct governing the
relationship between members of society (assures
order and predictability). - Legal sanctions Threat of specific punishment
for disobeying the rules
24Sources of Law in the U.S.
- Constitutional Law U.S. Constitution is the
ultimate (final, fundamental) source of law in
the United States (as state constitutions are in
the individual states). - Statutory Law (written down, organized, usually
as codes, e.g., Penal Code) - Administrative (decided by government agencies,
e.g., FCC, FTC, or DMV at the state level) - Executive Orders
25Legal systems
- Most nations today follow one of two major legal
traditions - Civil Law (Roman Law or Continental law)
- Common Law (Anglo-American Law)
26Legal systems today
27Civil Law (from Latin ius civile, the law
applicable to all Roman citizens Roman Law)
- Origins in Ancient Greece, 6th Century BCE
- Expanded and perfected by the Romans in the next
several centuries codified by the Emperor
Justinian in the sixth century CE. - The era of Enlightenment produced comprehensive,
systematic national legal codes, especially
Frances Civil Code (known as the Napoleonic
Code) of 1804. - They are the models of todays civil law systems.
28Civil law countries (examples)
- Most European countries Germany, France,
Russia, Spain, Poland, Sweden, etc. - China adopted Western civil law system after the
Revolution of 1911, with strong Confucian and
socialist (after 1948) influences. - Japan adopted civil law system in 1896
- Almost all of Latin America
-
29Civil law
- Civil law codified law
- In civil law only legislative enactments are
considered legally binding (not a judicial
precedent as in common law) - The interpretation of the law by the courts is
rare and usually at the highest level only. - Civil law is interpreted rather than developed or
made by judges. Interpretation does not create
precedent
30The Common Law
- The Common Law was conceived in 1066 and born of
a union between older Saxon law and the custom of
the Norman conquerors. - The Common Law was nurtured in London lawcourts
by judges and barristers. - The Common Law spread only by conquest and
colonization no one ever accepted it freely
31Common Law The role of precedent
- The common law is often created and refined by
judges - When there is no authoritative statement of the
law, judges have the authority and duty to make
law by creating precedent. - The body of precedent is called "common law" and
it binds future decisions (this principle is
known as stare decisis to abide by decided
cases)
32Common Law The role of precedent
- The precedent is the new guiding principle (new
law). - However although the presumption is on the side
of the precedent, the precedent can be ignored,
reversed or overruled.
33Judicial review
- The right of the federal courts to declare laws
of Congress and acts of the executive branch void
if they are judged to be in conflict with the
Constitution - Established in Marbury v. Madison (1803)
34Chief Justice Marshall in 1803
- It is emphatically the province and duty of the
judiciary to say what the law is. Those who apply
the rule to particular cases, must of necessity
expound and interpret that rule. 1803
35The Structure of the Courts
- Jurisdiction the power of a court to decide a
dispute - Subject matter jurisdiction
- Territorial jurisdiction
- Hierarchy jurisdiction
- International
36Subject matter
- Courts of general jurisdiction (state or federal)
- (the limitation is mainly territorial)
- Courts of limited jurisdiction (legislative)
- set up by Congress for special purposes over
some specialized areas (e.g., bankruptcy, taxes,
immigration, military)
37Territorial / Geographical
- Courts are authorized to hear and decide disputes
arising within a specified geographical
jurisdiction - All types of courts are divided into geographical
areas - (The Supreme Court is the exception)
38Federal courts jurisdiction
- To resolve legal disputes that arise under the
laws passed by Congress and federal agencies, or
the U.S. Constitution - To resolve disputes between citizens of different
states (diversity-of-citizenship cases), usually
covers state laws
39Hierarchical U.S. and California(from lowest
to highest)
- The U.S.
- District Courts (trial courts)
- Appellate Courts
- The U.S. Supreme Court
-
- California
- Superior Courts (trial courts)
- Appellate Courts
- California Supreme Court
40Courts of the original jurisdiction (trial courts)
- District courts (94) are courts of the original
jurisdiction. They have the authority to try a
case and decide it. - In California the equivalent of District Courts
are Superior Courts (58)
41The Superior Court of California
42Courts of Appeals
- Courts of Appeals have appellate jurisdiction
they have the power to review cases which have
been already decided by lower courts. - In U.S.
- 12 Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals (11
multi-state one in D.C.), - Federal Circuit (nationwide) for specialized
cases, such as those involving patent laws and
cases decided by the Court of International Trade - In California 6 Courts of Appeals
43U.S. Courts of Appeals
44The Supreme Court of the United States
45Getting to Court The Story of a Lawsuit
- Civil action Action brought to enforce, redress,
or protect private rights. All that does not
fall into category of criminal action. - Criminal action Action brought to punish crimes.
Crime is a violation of penal law.
46Civil cases
- It must be JUSTICIABLE.
- There must be a real and substantial
controversy. It cannot be academic, theoretical,
or moot. - Moot case already solved or withdrawn
- Remedy the means to redress an injury or
enforce a right
47Civil cases
- STANDING TO SUE.
- A concept utilized to determine if a party has
sufficient stake in an otherwise justiciable
controversy. (If the party is sufficiently
affected).
48Civil cases terminologyPlaintiff v. Defendant
(litigants)
- Complaint (answer/response)
- Pretrial Motions motion to dismiss (no legal
basis for the trial), motion for summary judgment
(no factual basis for the trial) - Discovery gaining information
- Trial Jury, Preponderance of evidence standard
- Damages (money awards)
- Injunction (decided by judge)
49Criminal cases terminologyProsecution v.
Defendant
- Arrest, Criminal Complaint, Arraignment
- Preliminary hearing (or Grand Jury)
- Judges ruling (or indictment)
- Motions (e.g., to suppress evidence)
- Trial Beyond reasonable doubt
- Conviction, Sentencing
50Appeals terminology
- Examining lower courts actions
- (but not the facts)
- Appellant, Appellee
- Legal Brief
- Affirm, Modify, Reverse, Remand
- Opinions majority, concurring, dissenting,
plurality
51Furman v. Georgia, (1972). One page per curiam
opinion 200 pages of concurrence and dissent.
Concurrence Douglas
Concurrence Brennan
Concurrence Stewart
Concurrence White
Concurrence Marshall
Dissent Burger, joined by Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist
Dissent Blackmun
Dissent Powell, joined by Burger, Blackmun, Rehnquist
Dissent Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Blackmun, Powell
52How a case gets to the Supreme Court?
- From
- District Court (or state courts) to
- The Appellate courts to
- The Supreme Court
- BUT
- The Supreme Court does not have to hear any
appeal it does not want to hear
53(No Transcript)
54The case load in the U.S.state and federal
- State courts about 33,000,000 cases filed a
year (20m civil and 13m criminal) - 60,000,000 minor infractions (traffic etc.)
- District Courts about 300,000 lawsuits annually
- Almost 50,000 are appealed to one of the Circuit
Courts of Appeals. - U.S. Supreme Court receives approximately 7,000
petitions for a hearing. - Only about one hundred are granted a hearing.
55A writ of certiorari (cert.)
- When the Supreme Court agrees to hear a case it
issues a writ of certiorari an order to the lower
court requiring the latter to produce a certified
record of a particular case. - Practically an agreement to hear a case.
56The selection of cases
- The key principles
- the federal law must follow the United States
Constitution - There should not be a conflict / inconsistencies
/contradictions between rulings of different
courts
57Scenario 1 When a U. S. court of appeals
- has rendered a decision in conflict with the
decision of another United States court of
appeals on the same matter -
58U.S. Courts of Appeals
59Scenario 2 When a U. S. court of appeals
- has decided a federal question in a way in
conflict with a state court of the last resort
60Scenario 3 When a U. S. court of appeals
- has so far departed from the accepted and usual
judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise
of this Courts power of supervision
61Scenario 4When a state court of last resort
- has decided a federal question in a way in
conflict with the decision of another states
court of the last resort or of a United States
court of appeals.
62Scenario 5 When a state court or U.S. court of
appeals
- a. has an important question of federal law
which has not been, but should be settled by this
Court - b. has decided question in a way in conflict
with applicable decisions of this Court.
63The Rule of Four
- At least four justices must agree on accepting a
case for a review.
64US Supreme Court original jurisdiction
- to consider the facts and the law of a case
without it having first been passed on by a lower
court. - the only original jurisdiction cases commonly
handled by the Supreme Court are disputes between
two or more U.S. states (e.g., boundary lines,
water claims, etc.)