Law and the American Legal System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

Law and the American Legal System

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Mariusz Ozminkowski Last modified by: Mariusz Ozminkowski Created Date: 2/19/2001 7:22:41 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: Mariu8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Law and the American Legal System


1
Law and the American Legal System
  • COMM 407

2
The ever present lawEverywhere All the time
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
Everything seems to be decided by the courts
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Federal Regulations on 'Net Neutrality' Are
Voided, Clearing Way for New Fees
  • Washington 01/14/2014. A three-judge panel of
    the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
    Columbia Circuit struck down federal rules
    requiring broadband providers to treat all
    Internet traffic equally.
  • Adopted in 2010, the Federal Communications
    Commission rules said that companies like Verizon
    Communications Inc. had to treat all similar
    content on their networks equally, whether it was
    a YouTube video or a home video posted on a
    personal website.

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
Ethics, Law, and Mass Communication
  • Ethics (or moral philosophy) The field
    concerned with what is right and wrong behavior.
  • Usually divided into
  • metaethics,
  • normative ethics,
  • and applied ethics

17
Ethics
  • Metaethics questions of where our ethical
    principles come from (for example are they just
    social inventions?)
  • Normative ethics prescriptions for our conduct,
    the duties that we should follow
  • applied ethics examining specific controversial
    issues for example in media ethics

18
From normative ethics (morality) to law
  • Ethical standards regulate behavior. They
    provide basis for social rules
  • Ethical sanctions
  • Social disapproval or social praise
  • Feeling of guilt or feeling of virtue

19
From ethics to law
  • The argument can be stated that where ethics
    (morality) is not followed, the law begins.
  • With perfect agreement on morality, law would not
    be necessary
  • That agreement is impossible in diverse
    communities or countries
  • Thus the need for law

20
The Ideal
  • Laws should be used minimally
  • reserved only for those that do not take into
    account the well being of the society.
  • Law as control of behavior
  • ALSO
  • Law as an arbiter in conflict between people,
    their interests, and rights

21
Conflict of interestsConflict of rights
  • The right to property
  • But
  • The eminent domain
  • The externalities (pollution)

22
Conflict of interestsConflict of rights
  • The right to free speech
  • But
  • The right to privacy
  • The right to protect persons reputation
  • The right to safety
  • The right to fair trial
  • And much more

23
What is Law?
  • Law is a body of rules enacted by public
    officials in a legitimate manner and backed by
    the force of the state
  • Law is a body of rules of conduct governing the
    relationship between members of society (assures
    order and predictability).
  • Legal sanctions Threat of specific punishment
    for disobeying the rules

24
Sources of Law in the U.S.
  • Constitutional Law U.S. Constitution is the
    ultimate (final, fundamental) source of law in
    the United States (as state constitutions are in
    the individual states).
  • Statutory Law (written down, organized, usually
    as codes, e.g., Penal Code)
  • Administrative (decided by government agencies,
    e.g., FCC, FTC, or DMV at the state level)
  • Executive Orders

25
Legal systems
  • Most nations today follow one of two major legal
    traditions
  • Civil Law (Roman Law or Continental law)
  • Common Law (Anglo-American Law)

26
Legal systems today

27
Civil Law (from Latin ius civile, the law
applicable to all Roman citizens Roman Law)
  • Origins in Ancient Greece, 6th Century BCE
  • Expanded and perfected by the Romans in the next
    several centuries codified by the Emperor
    Justinian in the sixth century CE.
  • The era of Enlightenment produced comprehensive,
    systematic national legal codes, especially
    Frances Civil Code (known as the Napoleonic
    Code) of 1804.
  • They are the models of todays civil law systems.

28
Civil law countries (examples)
  • Most European countries Germany, France,
    Russia, Spain, Poland, Sweden, etc.
  • China adopted Western civil law system after the
    Revolution of 1911, with strong Confucian and
    socialist (after 1948) influences.
  • Japan adopted civil law system in 1896
  • Almost all of Latin America

29
Civil law
  • Civil law codified law
  • In civil law only legislative enactments are
    considered legally binding (not a judicial
    precedent as in common law)
  • The interpretation of the law by the courts is
    rare and usually at the highest level only.
  • Civil law is interpreted rather than developed or
    made by judges. Interpretation does not create
    precedent

30
The Common Law
  • The Common Law was conceived in 1066 and born of
    a union between older Saxon law and the custom of
    the Norman conquerors.
  • The Common Law was nurtured in London lawcourts
    by judges and barristers.
  • The Common Law spread only by conquest and
    colonization no one ever accepted it freely

31
Common Law The role of precedent
  • The common law is often created and refined by
    judges
  • When there is no authoritative statement of the
    law, judges have the authority and duty to make
    law by creating precedent.
  • The body of precedent is called "common law" and
    it binds future decisions (this principle is
    known as stare decisis to abide by decided
    cases)

32
Common Law The role of precedent
  • The precedent is the new guiding principle (new
    law).
  • However although the presumption is on the side
    of the precedent, the precedent can be ignored,
    reversed or overruled.

33
Judicial review
  • The right of the federal courts to declare laws
    of Congress and acts of the executive branch void
    if they are judged to be in conflict with the
    Constitution
  • Established in Marbury v. Madison (1803)

34
Chief Justice Marshall in 1803
  • It is emphatically the province and duty of the
    judiciary to say what the law is. Those who apply
    the rule to particular cases, must of necessity
    expound and interpret that rule. 1803

35
The Structure of the Courts
  • Jurisdiction the power of a court to decide a
    dispute
  • Subject matter jurisdiction
  • Territorial jurisdiction
  • Hierarchy jurisdiction
  • International

36
Subject matter
  • Courts of general jurisdiction (state or federal)
  • (the limitation is mainly territorial)
  • Courts of limited jurisdiction (legislative)
  • set up by Congress for special purposes over
    some specialized areas (e.g., bankruptcy, taxes,
    immigration, military)

37
Territorial / Geographical
  • Courts are authorized to hear and decide disputes
    arising within a specified geographical
    jurisdiction
  • All types of courts are divided into geographical
    areas
  • (The Supreme Court is the exception)

38
Federal courts jurisdiction
  • To resolve legal disputes that arise under the
    laws passed by Congress and federal agencies, or
    the U.S. Constitution
  • To resolve disputes between citizens of different
    states (diversity-of-citizenship cases), usually
    covers state laws

39
Hierarchical U.S. and California(from lowest
to highest)
  • The U.S.
  • District Courts (trial courts)
  • Appellate Courts
  • The U.S. Supreme Court
  • California
  • Superior Courts (trial courts)
  • Appellate Courts
  • California Supreme Court

40
Courts of the original jurisdiction (trial courts)
  • District courts (94) are courts of the original
    jurisdiction. They have the authority to try a
    case and decide it.
  • In California the equivalent of District Courts
    are Superior Courts (58)

41
The Superior Court of California
42
Courts of Appeals
  • Courts of Appeals have appellate jurisdiction
    they have the power to review cases which have
    been already decided by lower courts.
  • In U.S.
  • 12 Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals (11
    multi-state one in D.C.),
  • Federal Circuit (nationwide) for specialized
    cases, such as those involving patent laws and
    cases decided by the Court of International Trade
  • In California 6 Courts of Appeals

43
U.S. Courts of Appeals
44
The Supreme Court of the United States
45
Getting to Court The Story of a Lawsuit
  • Civil action Action brought to enforce, redress,
    or protect private rights. All that does not
    fall into category of criminal action.
  • Criminal action Action brought to punish crimes.
    Crime is a violation of penal law.

46
Civil cases
  • It must be JUSTICIABLE.
  • There must be a real and substantial
    controversy. It cannot be academic, theoretical,
    or moot.
  • Moot case already solved or withdrawn
  • Remedy the means to redress an injury or
    enforce a right

47
Civil cases
  • STANDING TO SUE.
  • A concept utilized to determine if a party has
    sufficient stake in an otherwise justiciable
    controversy. (If the party is sufficiently
    affected).

48
Civil cases terminologyPlaintiff v. Defendant
(litigants)
  • Complaint (answer/response)
  • Pretrial Motions motion to dismiss (no legal
    basis for the trial), motion for summary judgment
    (no factual basis for the trial)
  • Discovery gaining information
  • Trial Jury, Preponderance of evidence standard
  • Damages (money awards)
  • Injunction (decided by judge)

49
Criminal cases terminologyProsecution v.
Defendant
  • Arrest, Criminal Complaint, Arraignment
  • Preliminary hearing (or Grand Jury)
  • Judges ruling (or indictment)
  • Motions (e.g., to suppress evidence)
  • Trial Beyond reasonable doubt
  • Conviction, Sentencing

50
Appeals terminology
  • Examining lower courts actions
  • (but not the facts)
  • Appellant, Appellee
  • Legal Brief
  • Affirm, Modify, Reverse, Remand
  • Opinions majority, concurring, dissenting,
    plurality

51
Furman v. Georgia, (1972). One page per curiam
opinion 200 pages of concurrence and dissent.
Concurrence Douglas
Concurrence Brennan
Concurrence Stewart
Concurrence White
Concurrence Marshall
Dissent Burger, joined by Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist
Dissent Blackmun
Dissent Powell, joined by Burger, Blackmun, Rehnquist
Dissent Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Blackmun, Powell
52
How a case gets to the Supreme Court?
  • From
  • District Court (or state courts) to
  • The Appellate courts to
  • The Supreme Court
  • BUT
  • The Supreme Court does not have to hear any
    appeal it does not want to hear

53
(No Transcript)
54
The case load in the U.S.state and federal
  • State courts about 33,000,000 cases filed a
    year (20m civil and 13m criminal)
  • 60,000,000 minor infractions (traffic etc.)
  • District Courts about 300,000 lawsuits annually
  • Almost 50,000 are appealed to one of the Circuit
    Courts of Appeals.
  • U.S. Supreme Court receives approximately 7,000
    petitions for a hearing.
  • Only about one hundred are granted a hearing.

55
A writ of certiorari (cert.)
  • When the Supreme Court agrees to hear a case it
    issues a writ of certiorari an order to the lower
    court requiring the latter to produce a certified
    record of a particular case.
  • Practically an agreement to hear a case.

56
The selection of cases
  • The key principles
  • the federal law must follow the United States
    Constitution
  • There should not be a conflict / inconsistencies
    /contradictions between rulings of different
    courts

57
Scenario 1 When a U. S. court of appeals
  • has rendered a decision in conflict with the
    decision of another United States court of
    appeals on the same matter

58
U.S. Courts of Appeals
59
Scenario 2 When a U. S. court of appeals
  • has decided a federal question in a way in
    conflict with a state court of the last resort

60
Scenario 3 When a U. S. court of appeals
  • has so far departed from the accepted and usual
    judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise
    of this Courts power of supervision

61
Scenario 4When a state court of last resort
  • has decided a federal question in a way in
    conflict with the decision of another states
    court of the last resort or of a United States
    court of appeals.

62
Scenario 5 When a state court or U.S. court of
appeals
  • a. has an important question of federal law
    which has not been, but should be settled by this
    Court
  • b. has decided question in a way in conflict
    with applicable decisions of this Court.

63
The Rule of Four
  • At least four justices must agree on accepting a
    case for a review.

64
US Supreme Court original jurisdiction
  • to consider the facts and the law of a case
    without it having first been passed on by a lower
    court.
  • the only original jurisdiction cases commonly
    handled by the Supreme Court are disputes between
    two or more U.S. states (e.g., boundary lines,
    water claims, etc.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com