Structure of the Federal Courts Supreme Choice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Structure of the Federal Courts Supreme Choice

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Julie Strong Last modified by: CCS Created Date: 8/12/2005 6:23:48 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:174
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: JulieS107
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Structure of the Federal Courts Supreme Choice


1
Structure of the Federal Courts Supreme Choice
  • Process Politics of Presidential
  • Nominations
  • to the
  • Supreme Court
  • Chapter 16, Themes B C

2
Pop Quiz 16 Define each of the following terms
  1. Using a blue slip to reject nominees from the
    state
  2. Examination of a judicial nominees ideology
  3. A case authorized as having legal merit
  4. A petition to waive the filing fee
  5. An order to send up records documents from
    lower courts
  6. The Rule that the federal government cant be
    sued without its consent
  • 1. Writ of certiorari
  • 2. Litmus Test
  • 3. Standing
  • 4. In forma pauperis
  • 5. Senatorial courtesy
  • 6. Sovereign Immunity

3
Exclusive Jurisdiction
  • The Federal Court system has exclusive
    jurisdiction over
  • Federal question cases involving the U.S.
    Constitution, federal law, or treaties
  • Diversity cases involving different states, or
    citizens of different states
  • The Federal District Courts have original
    jurisdiction over these cases. The SCOTUS has
    appellate jurisdiction over the District US
    Court of Appeals.

4
The Federal Courts
  • Federal District Courts
  • Have original jurisdiction in most federal
    criminal civil cases.
  • 94 districts, at least one per state.
  • Nearest courthouse is Elizabeth City.
  • Are work horses of the federal system. Most
    cases heard here.
  • Only federal court where a jury trial is held.
    All others have bench trials.

5
The Federal Courts
  • US Court of Appeals
  • 12 regular circuits, including 1 in D.C.
  • Judges sit in panels of 3.
  • Have only appellate jurisdiction. (Hear only
    appeals.)
  • NC in Circuit 4, centered in Richmond, VA.
  • The 13th circuit or Federal Circuit was created
    in 1982 in Washington, DC to hear civil appeals
    from several courts the Patent Office.

6
US Judicial Circuits

7
The Federal Courts
  • Legislative Courts Help Congress
    exercise its power
  • US Claims Ct. Hear money suits vs. US (Civil
    Court)
  • US Tax Ct. Hear civil disputes with IRS (Civil
    Court)
  • Ct. of Military Appeals Also called GIs
    Supreme Court (Criminal Appeals)
  • Ct. of Veteran Appeals Hear disputes over
    benefits with the Dept. of VA (Civil Court)
  • Territorial Courts Run like state courts.
    Territories are US Virgin Islands, Guam, Puerto
    Rico, N. Marianas Islands. (Criminal, Civil,
    Territorial Constitutional)
  • DC Courts Run like municipal courts in most
    large cities. (Civil Criminal Courts)

8
Appellate Jurisdiction Cases
  • SCOTUS hears appeals from the 13 circuits of the
    US Court of appeals
  • Usually after diversity of rulings between
    circuits
  • Matters of public policy disputes
  • Some cases that begin in state courts can be
    appealed to the Supreme Court
  • Involves a constitutional question
  • Involves a federal law
  • Involves state court striking down a federal law

9
State Route
Federal Route
10
SCOTUS Original Jurisdiction
  • Controversies between two state governments can
    only be heard by the Supreme Court
  • Controversies involving foreign diplomats can
    only be heard by the Supreme Court
  • Controversies between the US and a state
  • See Chart!

11
Figure 16.2 The Jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts
12
Appointments to the Federal Bench
  • Review process.
  • What is senatorial courtesy when is it used?
  • Counter to Constitution?
  • When is this practice irrelevant?
  • Why is appointing a Justice so scrutinized today?

13
Analyzing Political Cartoons
  • For each cartoon, discuss the following
  • What is the message of the cartoon?
  • Does this have a liberal, conservative or neutral
    slant?
  • What events might have prompted this cartoon to
    be published?

14
Political Cartoon ATitle The Supreme Court
Location
Mike Keefe, The Denver Post, Oct. 6,
2004 http//cagle.slate.msn.com/politicalcartoons/
15
Political Cartoon BTitle High Stakes Supreme
Court Seat
February 19, 2016 http//bokbluster.com/
16
Political Cartoon CTitle Qualifications
05/2009
www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog
17
Political Cartoon DTitle Supreme Court - 31
Flavors
Robert Ariail, The State, Aug. 10,
2005 http//cagle.slate.msn.com/politicalcartoons/

18
Political Cartoon ETitle The Confirmation
Process
www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog
19
Political Cartoon FTitle Go My Pretties!
Henry Payne, The Detroit News, Aug. 11,
2005 http//cagle.slate.msn.com/politicalcartoons/

20
Political Cartoon GTitle Supreme Court Exam
Jimmy Margulies, New Jersey -- The Record, Aug.
11, 2005 http//cagle.slate.msn.com/politicalcarto
ons/
21
Political Cartoon HTitle Senate Republicans
rule out action
Posted on February 23, 2016 www.ncrenegade.com
22
Factors That Influence Supreme Court Nominations
23
Factors That Influence Supreme Court Nominations
  • Party affiliation (80 or higher)
  • Judicial Philosophy
  • Litmus Test- where nominees stand on
    controversial issues like abortion
  • Background of nominee (education, experience,
    race, gender, ethnicity, etc.)
  • Cultivating political support
  • Political favors
  • Interest group input
  • American Bar Association certification
  • Securing a safe nominee

24
The U.S. Constitution and the Appointment of
Supreme Court Justices
  • Article II, Section 2 describes the appointment
    powers of the President
  • He shall have Power, by and with the Advice
    and Consent of the Senate to nominate Judges of
    the Supreme Court.

25
U.S. Supreme Court Confirmation Process
Stage 2 Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing
Stage 3 Full Senate Vote
Stage 4 Oath of Office?
26
U.S. Supreme Court Confirmation Process
  1. White House staff reviews candidates and submits
    a short list to president
  2. FBI background investigation
  3. Candidates submit financial disclosure forms
  4. ABA grades candidates
  5. Interest groups weigh in on candidates
  6. President selects nominee

Stage 1 Presidential Nomination
27
U.S. Supreme Court Confirmation Process
Stage 2 Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings
  1. Senate Judiciary members and their staffs review
    candidates background (may conduct own
    investigation)
  2. Interest groups may conduct campaigns for or
    against nominee (including TV ads)
  3. Intense media attention to Senate hearings
  4. Senate Judiciary Committee questions candidate on
    judicial philosophy, stands on key issues, etc.
  5. Judiciary Committee votes up or down on nominee
    and sends recommendation to full Senate

28
U.S. Supreme Court Confirmation Process
Stage 3 Full Senate Vote
  • Floor debate on nominee
  • Confirmation vote by full Senate

29
U.S. Supreme Court Confirmation Process
Stage 4 Oath of Office
  1. If confirmed by the Senate, nominee sworn in,
    usually by Chief Justice
  2. Once on the Court, justices often make decisions
    on the bench very different from what the
    nominating President had anticipated

independent judiciary
30
Sowhat happens with just 8?
  • If the SCOTUS ends in a tie, the appellate
    courts decisions stand. This is a form of stare
    decisis.
  • If you have 2 different rulings in 2 different
    circuits, the law may be applied differently in
    those areas.
  • If the Senate goes out of session for more than 3
    days, Pres. Obama could do a recess appointment.
  • Pres. Obama has nominated Merrick Garland, but
    the Senate refuses to give a hearing.

31
I will take this case all the way to the Supreme
Court
  • Start 1st Monday in October and runs through June
    (36 weeks).
  • Rule of Four to hear a case
  • Annual docket submissions8,000 cases
  • Fewer than 100 heard or reviewed, only 75-80
    written opinions/year
  • 300 filing fee
  • In forma pauperis outnumber 3-1
  • Quorum 6

32
(No Transcript)
33
Why so few cases to SCOTUS?
  • Expensive What kinds of costs are involved?
  • In forma pauperis cases more common
  • Fee shifting (esp. Section 1983 cases) increasing
  • Standing Controversy, harm remedy
  • Taxpayers have limited rights
  • Sovereign immunity rare
  • Lengthy Process can take years!
  • Class Action lawsuits now limited by rules

34
Assignment
  • Read pp. 455-463. Take notes on process of
    hearing cases and focus on the powers and limits
    of the Courts. Also, take down important
    vocabulary cases relating to the topics. Due
    Tuesday!
  • Be working on templates. See website your
    e-mail for instructions, rubric, template, and
    list of cases by subject. These are due shared no
    later than 300 on April 15th!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com