- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Description:

Title Against Nature Author: Chris Reeves Last modified by: Chris Reeves Created Date: 9/20/2004 4:49:49 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: ChrisR284
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title:


1
Against Nature
  • What the Bible Teaches
  • About Homosexuality

2
How Some ChristiansJustify Homosexuality
  • Neglect Bible verses (ignore the clear verses
    against homosexuality)
  • Selective Bible verses (focus in on the verses
    about love and forgiveness)
  • Reinterpret Bible verses (explain away these
    verses as not really condemning homosexuality)
  • Substitute Bible verses (appeal to science and
    genetics instead of the Bible)

3
Arguments from the Old TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Help meet in Genesis 218 means companion
    which is what a homosexual partner is.
  • Answer God created a female, a wife for
    Adam. One must not ignore who God made to be a
    help meet.

4
Arguments from the Old TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • The sin of Sodom was inhospitality (Lk. 1012).
  • The sin of Sodom was pride
    (Ezek. 1649 Isa. 39 Jer. 2314)
  • The sin of Sodom was nonconsensual, homosexual
    rape.
  • Answer No, the sin was giving themselves over
    to fornication and going after strange flesh
    (Jude 7 see 2 Pet. 26). Also, know (Heb.
    yadah) in Gen. 195,8 refers to sexual
    intercourse (see NIV and Gen. 41,17,25 2416
    3826 Num. 3117,18,35 Judg. 1139 1925
    2111-12 1 Sam. 119 1 K. 14 Mt. 123,25 Lk.
    127,34)

5
Arguments from the Old TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Leviticus 1822 condemns the passive role in
    homosexuality, not the active role.
  • Leviticus 1822 condemns homosexuality in
    connection with idolatry.
  • Answer No, this passage is condemning the
    homosexual intercourse of both parties (see Lev.
    2013), not a specific role (posture) of one
    party while engage in the intercourse. This
    passage speaks of immoral personal behavior, not
    just idolatry.

6
Arguments from the Old TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Ruth and Naomi were lesbian lovers (Ruth
    114-18)
  • Answer No, both women were married to men (Ruth
    12 413).

7
Arguments from the Old TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • David and Jonathan had a homosexual relationship
    (1 Sam. 181-3 2030,41).
  • Answer First, love and kiss in the Bible do
    not always imply erotic, passionate, sexual
    desire. Second, David was married to Michal,
    Sauls daughter (1 Sam. 1827-28). He had a
    problem with adultery (2 Sam. 11), not
    homosexuality! Third, 1 Sam. 2030 refers to the
    shame a foolish son brings to his mother (Prov.
    101 1520 1725).

8
Arguments from the New TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Jesus said nothing about homosexuality.
  • Answer First, he spoke of the condemnation of
    Sodom. Second, he spoke positively about what God
    desires for a man and a woman (Mt. 193-9).
    Third, he spoke through Paul against
    homosexuality (1 Cor. 69-10 1437) Note It is
    important to point this out to those who follow
    the red letter edition of the New Testament.
    Fourth, Jesus said nothing directly about incest,
    rape, pedophilia, or bestiality? Are these
    practices ok?

9
Arguments from the New TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Jesus said marriage between a male and female is
    not for everyone i.e. a eunuch (Mt.
    1912) therefore, a man can be with a man a
    woman with a woman.
  • Answer Jesus is contrasting marriage (between a
    man and a woman), and celibacy not
    heterosexuality and homosexuality.

10
Arguments from the New TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Jesus healed the centurions boy, but he did
    not condemn their homosexual relationship (Mt.
    86,8).
  • Answer The Gr. pais is translated child,
    maiden, son young man, or servant. Lukes
    account makes it clear that this child was a
    servant (Lk. 72ff). There is no hint of
    homosexuality between the two.

11
Arguments from the New TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Jesus was a homosexual because it is said that
    he loved some man (Jn. 1136 1323 2120).
  • Answer The love (Gr. agape and phileo) of
    Jesus toward other men was not errotic,
    passionate love (Gr. eros).

12
Arguments from the New TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Against nature in Roman 126 simply means
    those that are naturally heterosexual trying to
    be homosexual i.e., inversion.
  • Answer No, the Greek phusis (nature) means
    the order of nature. Paul is talking about that
    which is abnormal, perverse and contrary to Gods
    created order of things the way He made man and
    woman from the beginning (Gen.
    218-25)

13
Arguments from the New TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Against nature in Roman 126 is the same in
    Romans 1124, and there it is not condemned.
  • Answer What God did with the Gentiles was indeed
    against nature (grafting a wild olive branch
    onto a domesticated olive tree), but Gods
    actions here are not described as immoral as they
    are in Romans 126-27.

14
Arguments from the New TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Paul is simply condemning homosexuality that is
    tied with idolatry.
  • Paul is simply condemning perverted
    homosexuality (homosexual rape, child
    molestation), not the loving, compassionate
    kind.
  • Answer No, homosexuality (in Rom. 1 and 1 Cor.
    6), and the other sins listed are sinful because
    they are immoral. Are the other sins listed here
    ok as long as they are not tied with idolatry,
    and are the loving, compassionate kind?

15
Arguments from the New TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Paul and other Bible writers were culturally
    conditioned against homosexuality, and therefore
    condemned it.
  • Answer First, Paul and all other Bible writers
    were inspired by God directly to write what they
    did (Gal. 111-17 2 Tim. 316). Second, Peter
    was conditioned against Gentiles, but was told
    to change (Acts 10 Gal. 211-14). If being
    conditioned against homosexuals is wrong, God
    would have told Paul so.

16
Arguments from the New TestamentUsed to Justify
Homosexuality
  • Strange in Jude 7 refers to sexual intercourse
    with angels (Gen. 62).
  • Answer No, Jude was talking about the events of
    Genesis 18-19 (2 Pet. 26-9). There is no record
    of sexual intercourse with angels in Sodom.
    Strange (Gr. heteros) refers to flesh of a
    different kind i.e. flesh of another man, and
    not a wife (Gen. 223-25).

17
Homosexual Rights
  • Homosexuals have a right to
  • Know that God regards their activity, not as a
    disease or sickness, but as a sin
    (1 Cor. 69-10)
  • Know that they were not born homosexual, but that
    they chose their abnormal conduct (Rom.
    126-27)
  • Know that they will suffer the consequences of
    their sin (Rom. 126-27)

18
Homosexual Rights
  • Homesexuals have a right to
  • Know the truth of the gospel (Mk. 1615-16)
  • Know that they can repent, change, and stop their
    sin (1 Cor. 611)
  • Know that they can be put away by their lawful
    spouse for their sinful activity (Mt. 199 Jude
    7)
  • Know that they can have a happy heterosexual
    marriage (1 Cor. 71-2)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com