Title: Retirement Patterns in Europe and the U.S.
1Retirement Patterns in Europe and the U.S.
- Arie Kapteyn (RAND)
- Tatiana Andreyeva (Yale)
2What we do
- Document substantial differences in retirement
patterns across Europe and with the U.S. - Discuss several explanations for these
differences - Discuss the role of health
- Estimate a somewhat illustrative model explaining
the differences - Use the model to simulate some policy options
3SHARE
- The Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in
Europe (SHARE) is patterned after the Health and
Retirement Study in the U.S. and interviews
respondents over 50 in a number of European
countries. - In the fall of 2004, a first wave was conducted
in eleven European countries (Germany,
Switzerland, Belgium, Greece, Netherlands, Italy,
Austria, Sweden, Denmark, France, Spain) covering
about 18,000 households and 27,000 respondents. - We use the 2004 wave of HRS (some 20,000
respondents 50 and over in the U.S.)
4SHARE is Part of a Global Movement
- US Health and Retirement Study (HRS, 9 waves)
- UK English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA, 4
waves) - Mexico Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS, 2
waves) - Europe SHARE (3 waves)
- Korea Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA,
2 waves) - Japan (2 waves)
- China (pilot done, first wave soon)
- India (pilot soon)
5Health
- SHARE contains extensive health measures. For now
we use a Self Reported Health measure, which
rates health on a five-point scale Excellent,
Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor. - It turns out that respondents in different
countries report very different health status
6Health
- So if we want to use health as an explanatory
variable in cross-country analyses we normalize
being in poor or fair health is dived by the
proportion of respondents in a country with poor
or fair health. - In descriptive analyses we dont normalize, but
show country means along with the means for
subgroups
7Retirement Patterns (men) of 50-59
8Retirement Patterns (women) of 50-59
9Retirement Patterns (men) of 60-64
10Retirement Patterns (women) of 60-64
11Occupational status and health
12Occupational status and health
13Occupational status and health
14Occupational status and health
15So why do retirement patterns differ?
- Financial incentives
- Preferences/culture
- Institutions
- Health
16Financial Incentives Gruber and Wise,
11 Developed Countries Circa 1995
80
Belgium
70
,
Italy
France
,
Netherlands
60
,
,
UK
Germany
,
50
Spain
,
Canada
,
Unused Productive Capacity (55-65)
,
US
40
Sweden
,
,
30
Japan
,
20
10
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Tax Force to Retire (55-69)
Source Gruber and Wise 1999.
17Preferences/Culture
- Some countries like leisure more than others
(Blanchard) - Most of the annual hours reduction is a reduction
in the length of a full time workweek thus hard
to see it as involuntary
18Institutions
- Power of unions (Alesina, Glaeser, Sacerdote,
2005) - Partly a misguided attempt to maintain full
employment through shorter working weeks or
earlier retirement - Social multiplier effects (Glaeser et al., 2003)
19Health
- Unhealthy individuals retire earlier
- Yet, the secular improvement in health may induce
earlier retirement. - Why? Increased health improves life time
resources and the income effect probably induces
a higher demand for leisure. - Why do we see at the same time that unhealthy
individuals retire earlier? These are individuals
who have depleted their health capital more
quickly.
20A simple retirement model
- We describe todays labor market position as the
result of events that happened in the past (a
discrete hazard model starting at the age of 50).
- Individual explanatory variables
- age, poor/fair health, marital status, gender and
education. - Macro variables
- Early and normal retirement age
- Net replacement rate
- Generosity of disability benefits
21We simulate policy effects US replacement rates
22Delay retirement ages by 2 years
23U.S. Disability Benefits
24No Poor Health
25Concluding Remarks
- Retirement patterns vary widely across Europe
- Incentives matter and offer policy options
- Reward longer work
- Consider eligibility rules for benefits
- Tie eligibility age to life expectancy?
- Health has a significant effect on the propensity
to retire and offers policy options too - Make jobs healthier
- Improve education
- Promote healthy living
- One size does not fit all countries