Wind Energy in the Nantucket Sound - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Wind Energy in the Nantucket Sound

Description:

Wind Energy in the Nantucket Sound A righteous, pro-environmental alternative energy proposal? Or A profit seeking, ocean sacrificing capitalist scheme? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: Robert2400
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wind Energy in the Nantucket Sound


1
Wind Energy in the Nantucket Sound
  • A righteous, pro-environmental alternative energy
    proposal?
  • Or
  • A profit seeking, ocean sacrificing capitalist
    scheme?

2
Background
  • Wind turbines are being considered as a practical
    alternative to fossil fuel power plants for mass
    electricity production.
  • Using wind power to mechanize generators results
    in no greenhouse gas emissions as opposed to oil,
    natural gas, and coal at a potentially low cost.
  • As technology has advanced the application of
    wind power has become possible through
    competitive cost reduction and has been utilized
    domestically on land in Vermont and abroad on
    ocean sites off the coast of Denmark, Ireland and
    England.
  • Among the benefits are the lessening of
    dependency on foreign oil by reducing demand,
    decreasing energy costs for consumers, and a
    cleaner source of electricity with negligible
    impacts on the environment.

3
Proposal
  • In early November of 2001, Cape Wind initially
    submitted a proposal for a lesser sized tower for
    the purpose of gathering data on the area of the
    Sound.
  • Following this, Cape Wind also proposed the
    primary project which was to construct 170 wind
    turbines in the Nantucket Sound along with ocean
    floor transmission cables stretching to the
    Capes mainland as well as Marthas Vineyard and
    Nantucket.
  • The Army Corps of Engineers New England District
    received the submission and after initial
    assessment it was determined that an EIS must be
    made under NEPA law in order for the necessary
    permits to be acquired.

4
Proponents and Opponents
  • Advocates
  • Comprised of mainly small grass roots campaigns
    from among permanent Cape Cod and Island
    residents and the Cape Wind business interest.
  • Primarily interested in the reduction of fossil
    fuel use by power plants along the New England
    sea board and its environmental benefits as well
    as reduced electricity costs.
  • Opponents
  • Consists of several wealthy and interested summer
    residents, vacationers, and tourists that have
    arranged a larger organization called the
    Alliance.
  • Concerned with the effects that the turbines will
    have on the Capes natural scenery as well as
    their recreational activities. They are also
    troubled by the potential loss in value of their
    expensive coastline property.

5
The Proposals Progress
  • Through studies conducted by the Army Corps of
    Engineers as well as the Department of Interior
    compiled with the public comments from public and
    private interests an Environmental Impact
    Statement was processed and submitted in 2004. A
    subsequent study was done through the state law
    as well.
  • In response to the EIS the proposal was limited
    to only 130 turbines and it was determined that
    the initial area of the Nantucket Sound called
    Horseshoe Shoals was the optimal area for wind
    reliability.
  • The project has been slowed down in permit
    acquisition because of the Interiors entrance
    into the process. A tentative date has been has
    set for final permit acquisition in 2007 from the
    Interior and the project should begin by 2009 if
    passed completely.

6
Related Information
  • Advocates
  • It is calculated that the project will result in
    600-1000 construction jobs and 150 permanent jobs
    generating 7 million in labor income.
  • There will also be an increase of 22 million in
    economic output in the area.
  • The effects on wildlife will be negligible and
    even possibly beneficial for certain fish species
    such as the Cod who will be attracted to the area
    by the towers foundations.
  • Emissions would be reduced in New England power
    plants by 1 million tons per year.
  • Opponents
  • CO2 sequestration could be used as a process for
    eliminating and re-using greenhouse emissions and
    producing more oil and natural gas from drill
    sites.
  • Only 2 of the fossil fuels utilized in the
    country contribute to electricity generation.
  • Although subsidies will allow the business to
    enter the market, it will only result in a
    non-competitive industry because of the benefit
    in costs received by the wind energy business.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com