Cape Wind EIS Preliminary Screening of Alternatives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 71
About This Presentation
Title:

Cape Wind EIS Preliminary Screening of Alternatives

Description:

Cape Wind EIS Preliminary Screening of Alternatives – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 72
Provided by: corpsen
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cape Wind EIS Preliminary Screening of Alternatives


1
Regulatory Program
Authority Granted by Congress Section 10
Rivers Harbors Act of 1899 Process Leading to
Decision National Environmental Policy
Act Purpose Objective Review Public
Involvement Informed Decision
2
Environmental Impact Statement
  • Jan June 2002 EIS Scoping
  • March 2002 hearings
  • July November 2002 developed preliminary sites
    and screening criteria
  • November March 2002 Screening list of
    preliminary alternatives

3
Environmental Impact Statement
  • Detailed evaluation of sites undergoing further
    review
  • Data collection
  • Draft EIS released for public review comment
  • Public Hearing
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement
  • Record of Decision - Issue or Deny permit

4
Site Screening Process
  • EIS scoping Spring 2002
  • Sites suggested through public comment
  • initial screening criteria in June 2002 scope
  • Start with a long list of offshore terrestrial
    sites throughout NE
  • Using available information screen out/eliminate
    sites do not warrant detailed evaluation

5
EIS scope project purpose
  • Commercial scale renewable energy facility
    providing power to the New England grid

6
Range of Alternatives
  • Practical feasible in light of the underlying
    purpose need for the proposal
  • Not require costly time-consuming evaluation of
    conjectural alternatives

7
Commercial scale
  • Applicant proposed 420 MW facility
  • Recent projects in ISO-NE area range 200-1500MW
  • Corps has looked at /-20 as reasonable for
    previous projects
  • Example strip mall not considered a reasonable
    alternative to a regional shopping mall

8
Renewable energy
  • wind,
  • tidal,
  • solar,
  • biomass,
  • hydroelectric

9
Renewable technologies
  • information previously developed by others
  • which renewable energy sources may be considered
    feasible at this scale

10
  • Wind
  • Intermittment power source
  • Highly visible
  • Technological advances in past 20 years
  • Fastest growing energy source in U.S.
  • Generating capacity from 1kw-600mw
  • More than 20,000 commercial-sized wind turbines
    producing 2,000mw worldwide within last 10 years.
  • DOE standardized classification system of wind
    resource

11
  • Tidal
  • Similar to hydropower concept (barrage,
    powerhouse, turbine)
  • Power typically produced during ebb tide
  • .4mw-240mw generating capacity
  • Typically tidal ranges gt 10-15 feet
  • Highly variable power generation tidal cycles
  • Average capacity 25-30 of maximum output
    capacity
  • 240mw France 8 meter tide range
  • Northern Maine only potential New England
    Location

12
  • Wave
  • Technology is not yet commercially viable
  • Variety of wave capture technologies (surge,
    heaving, pitching, oscillating)
  • Least developed renewable energy technology
  • Generating capacity 1-30mw
  • Currently, only small (lt5mw) projects in
    development

13
  • Photovoltaic (P/V)/Solar
  • Solar energy storage intermittent power
  • New England has lower direct insolation than
    other parts of the country
  • Average duty cycles 1,500 hours/yr N.E.
  • Flat rate systems 50w-200kw
  • More feasible for off-grid and consumer
    applications
  • High cost to produce (0.38-0.80kwh)
  • Low efficiency

14
  • Biomass
  • Biomass feedstocks used as fuel source
  • Direct combustion
  • Biomass gasification
  • Close-coupled gasification
  • Second largest renewable energy resource in U.S.
    (7,000 mw-installed)
  • Biomass integrated gasification (BIG) integrated
    into combined cycle gas turbines not effective
    on commercial scale yet
  • Small scale demonstration projects 25kw-5mw
  • One BIG/GCGT in Sweden (6mw)
  • Results in generation of 100s ton of annual air
    emissions (NOxSO2)

15
  • Hydroelectric
  • Major hydro capacity is N. New England
  • Output can vary with seasonal flow
  • Annual utilization rates of 40-50 (1,000-7,000
    hours)
  • Small hydropower (1-30mw) 50 of the capacity
  • Large hydropower (gt30mw) remaining 50
  • Utilize impoundments, dams, diversion facilities,
    canals, run-of-river
  • Environmental impacts resulting from impoundment

16
Renewable Technologies
Summary
  • Solar not for large scale generation
  • Wave tidal are still developing, not clear that
    NE has suitable conditions
  • Hydroelectric sites are in northern NE where
    there is no demand-existing facilities being
    decommissioned in some places
  • Wind Biomass greatest potential for larger
    scale projects (Biomass combustion has air
    quality impacts)

17
Screening Criteria
18
Preliminary Screening Criteria
  • Sufficient surplus electric transmission capacity
    to transport 200-1,500 MW to load centers
    throughout the ISO-NE transmission system

19
Preliminary Screening Criteria
  • Wind Power Classification of 4 or greater (Wind
    speeds gt15.7 mph at 50 meters)

20
Wind Resource at 65 m
Created by TrueWind Solutions and AWS Scientific
Funded by Connecticut Clean Energy Fund, Mass.
Technology Collaborative, Northeast Utilities
Systems
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Preliminary Screening Criteria
  • Available land or offshore watersheet area
    sufficient to accommodate a 200-1,500 MW wind
    energy project

24
Equivalent Land / Water Area Ratio for Wind
Energy Generation
  • Assuming Wind Power Class 4 or greater
  • Industry Accepted Project Planning Guidelines
  • 1.2 X Ratio of Land to Water area for equivalent
    MW capacity
  • Land based
  • Ridgeline 1 mile per 10 MW
  • Open Space 20 acres per 1 MW
  • Lower wind class requires more land area per MW

25
Preliminary Screening Criteria
  • Engineering and design limitations
  • Physical, geological and environmental site
    conditions
  • Offshore water depths lt50 feet mean low water
    with significant wave heights of lt18 feet
  • Practical construction and maintenance access of
    state-of-the-art (2.7 MW or greater) wind turbine
    generators
  • Practical construction and maintenance of land
    and submarine electric transmission line
    interconnections
  • Available technology - Use of Alternating Current
    (AC) transmission systems

26
Preliminary Screening Criteria
  • Legal/Regulatory constraints
  • State or federal land or water use exclusions
  • Avoidance of state or federally protected
    environmental resource areas

27
Alternative Sites
28
Alternative Sites
  • Land-Based Alternatives
  • Massachusetts Military Reservation
  • Searsburg, VT
  • Princeton, MA
  • Skinner/Kibby townships, ME
  • Redington Pond/Black Nubble Mountain, ME
  • Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers, CT (Brownfield)
  • Greenfield, MA (Landfill)

29
Massachusetts Military Reservation / Otis Air
Force Base
30
Expansion at Searsburg VT. (Existing 6MW Facility)
31
Expansion at Princeton MA. (Existing Facility)
32
Skinner / Kibby Township Maine
33
Redington Black Nubble Mt. Maine
34
CT. DOT Site (Brownfield)
35
City of Greenfield Landfill
36
Alternative Sites
  • Offshore Alternatives
  • Nantucket Sound, MA
  • Nantucket Shoals, MA
  • Marthas Vineyard, MA (south)
  • Block Island, RI
  • Cape Ann, MA
  • Vinalhaven Island, ME

37
Nantucket Sound
38
Nantucket Shoals
39
South of Marthas Vineyard
40
Block Island
41
Cape Ann
42
Vinalhaven Island
43
Applying Criteria
44
Massachusetts Military Reservation
45
Massachusetts Military Reservation, MA
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • Available Land Area Approximately 22,000 acres
  • Wind Power Class 3
  • Engineering or Regulatory Constraints
  • EPA Superfund National Priority Listed Site
  • Priority Habitats of Rare Species
  • Adjacent to Shawme Crowell State Forest and
    Crane State Wildlife Management Area
  • Active Military Use with land use restrictions

46
(No Transcript)
47
Searsburg, VT (expansion)
  • Existing-Eleven 550 kW WTGs along .6 miles of
    ridgeline, encompassing 35 acres 6 MW Facility
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • Wind Power Class 4
  • Available Land Area
  • 30-40 MW of additional WTG installation available
    along adjacent ridgelines
  • would require private lands acquisition and use
    of Green Mountain National Forest lands

48
(No Transcript)
49
Princeton, MA (expansion)
  • Existing facility - Eight 40 kW WTGs
  • Princeton Municipal Light Department
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • Wind Power Class 2-3
  • Available Land Area
  • Wachusett Mt. State Reservation
  • Minns Wildlife Sanctuary
  • Private Lands

50
Skinner Kibby Township
51
Skinner / Kibby Township, ME
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • North South Transmission Constraint
  • Wind Power Class 5
  • Available Land Area-owner not willing to sell
  • Would require 50 miles of new or
    upgraded roads

52
(No Transcript)
53
Redington/Black Nubble Mt, ME
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • North South transmission constraint
  • Wind Power Class 5
  • Available Land Area
  • Property currently being developed
  • Twenty nine 1.75 kW WTGs proposed (52 MW) over
    220 acres along approx. 5 miles of ridgeline
  • Notes
  • Navy Survival School

54
(No Transcript)
55
CT DOT Site (Brownfield), CT
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • Transmission restricted
  • Wind Power Class 2
  • Available Land Area
  • 18 acres
  • Urban site

56
(No Transcript)
57
City of Greenfield, MA Landfill
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • Wind Power Class 3
  • Topographically blocked from wind resource
    Located at Base of Berkshire Mountains
  • Available Land Area
  • Approximately 20 acres
  • Adjacent to Deerfield River (wetlands/floodplain
    )
  • Notes
  • Contains Priority Habitat of Rare Species and
    Estimated Habitat of Rare Wildlife and Certified
    Vernal Pools

58
Proposed Alternative Horseshoe Shoal
59
Nantucket Sound, MA
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus yes
  • Wind Power Class 5
  • Available Watersheet Area yes
  • Notes
  • Water Depths less than 50 ft.
  • Sheltered from Open Ocean exposure
  • Max Wave Hgt. 15 ft.

60
Nantucket Shoals
61
Nantucket Shoals, MA
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • Interconnection distance too long for AC line
  • Wind Power Class 6
  • Available Watersheet Area
  • Notes
  • Water depths less than 50 ft.
  • Open ocean exposure from south and east
  • Max Wave Hgt 31.5 ft (WIS 88) 37.0 ft (WIS
    89)
  • Whale sitings in general vicinity

62
Marthas Vineyard
63
South of Marthas Vineyard, MA
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • Interconnection distance too long for AC
  • Wind Power Class 5
  • Available Watersheet Area
  • Notes
  • Water Depths greater than 50 ft.
  • Open Ocean Exposure to the south
  • Max Wave Hgt 26.9 ft (WIS 86)
  • Unexploded Ordinance near Nomans land
  • Entrance to Muskeget Channel
  • Seal winter haul out location (Nomans Land)

64
Block Island
65
Block Island, RI
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • Wind Power Class 3-4
  • Available Watersheet Area
  • Notes
  • Water Depths greater than 50 ft.
  • Open Ocean Exposure to the south
  • Max Wave Hgt 30.2 ft (WIS 82)
  • Major Shipping Channels
  • Whales seals known to frequent area

66
Cape Ann
67
Cape Ann, MA
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • Wind Power Class 4
  • Available Watersheet Area
  • Notes
  • Water Depths greater than 50 ft.
  • Open Ocean Exposure from the east
  • Max Wave Hgt 37.7 ft (WIS 95)
  • Concentration of right whale and humpback whale
    sightings
  • Harbor seal and/or grey seal winter haul out
    location (The Salvages)

68
Vinalhaven Island
69
Coastal Maine (Vinalhaven)
  • Transmission Capacity Surplus
  • Wind Power Class 4
  • Available Watersheet Area
  • Notes
  • Water Depths greater than 50 ft.
  • Open Ocean Exposure to the east
  • Max Wave Hgt 38.7 ft (WIS 103)
  • Geology (shallow bedrock / rock outcroppings)
  • Shipping Channels
  • Whales seals

70
Next Step
  • Which sites are to be eliminated from further
    consideration?
  • Which sites warrant detailed evaluation?

71
Schedule
  • Initial timeline minimum time required for each
    part of process
  • Draft EIS issuance dependent upon sites chosen
    for detailed evaluation
  • May - December
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com