Title: Campaign E-Mails
1Campaign E-Mails
2Forms of Interactivity
- One way communication (e.g. web pages).
- Two way communication (e.g. private
- e-mails).
- One to many communication (e.g. e-mails, list
servers, discussion groups, computer
conferences). - Many to many communication (e.g. group projects
submitted to a computer conference).
Doherty, A. (1998) "The Internet Destined to
Become a Passive Surfing Technology?",
Educational Technology, Vol. 38 (Sept-Oct), No.
5, p61-63
3Benefits
- Delivers information directly to user
- Easy to forward
- Source credibility
- Targets specific demographics (age, location,
education, etc) - Low cost
- Quick and easy to produce
- Enhances user perceptions of trustworthiness,
responsiveness, sensitivity. - Fundraising interactivity
Yi, Zhixian. (2007). E-Mail Use Patterns in the
United States. Chinese Librarianship an
International Electronic Journal, 24. URL
http//www.iclc.us/cliej/cl24yi.htm
4Detriments
- Effectiveness?
- Information Overload
- Wasted time/effort
5E-Mails from McCain
- directly and personally communicating with more
than 43,000 supporters during the 2000 election
cycle. - HOWEVER
- McCains Computer Literacy
Andrew Williams and Kaye Trammell, Candidate
Campaign E-Mail Messages in the Presidential
Election 2004
6E-Mails from Obama
- High Quantity
- Multiple Authors
- Messages and Information
- Interactivity
- VP Announcement
72004 Election E-mails
- Quantity
- Direct Address
- Self-Promotion vs. Attack
- Messages
- Issues vs. Character
- Interactivity
Trammell, Kaye and Paul Williams, Candidate
Campaign E-Mail Messages in the Presidential
Election 2004. American Behavioral Scientist,
Vol. 49, No. 4, 560-574 (2005)
8E-Mail Quantity 2004
- Overall increase in quantity closer to election
However
9Huge Increase for 2008 Election
- Obama
- (since 5/16)-111
- (9/15-10/4)-26
- McCain
- (9/15-10/4) 13
- Obama roughly doubling McCain in quantity
- Frequency attributed to variety of authors,
donation requests, and interactivity with
events/supporters
10Direct Address
- Bush
- direct address in 82.1 of messages
- Kerry
- direct address in 92.0 of messages
11Self-Promotion Vs. Opponent Attack
- Kerry
- promotion (44.6), attack (24.4) and combination
(31.1). - Bush
- promotion (51.9), attack (7.4) and combination
(40.7).
12Interactivity
- Bushs e-mail messages contained twice the
interactivity features of Kerrys
13Issues
- 38.5 of the e-mail messages.
- Bushs campaign focused on issues (66.7) at a
greater rate than Kerrys (33.3)
14Messages
- Most frequent
- 1) invitation of participation
- 2) emphasizing hope for the future
152004 E-Mail Trends
- INTERACTIVITY INCREASE
- Hyperlinks- get involved, send this message to
a friend, or even contact the campaign with
feedback. - Graphics- banner at the top of the e-mail message
(97.4), photographs (17.9) and special event
icons (6.4) - Multimedia- flash movies (1.3) or video (5.1),
including ads (1.3) - BUT STILL LIMITED
- Used 3/12 possible interactivity variables (1/4
of possibilities) - AUTHORSHIP
- Campaign staff- 60.3, candidates (14.1), other
politicians (6.4), family members of the
candidates (2.6), and celebrities (1.3)
16E-Mail Substance
- Issues (12.8)
- Personality or attributes of the candidate
(10.3). - Kerry
- focused on horserace (84.0), issue coverage
(8.0), and personality (8). - Bush
- focused on horserace (64.3), issue coverage
(21.4) and personality (14.3).
17Another Election
- 2002 Florida Gubernatorial
- Jeb Bush (R-I) and Bill McBride (D)
- Characteristics of E-mails
- Personal qualities (24.7)
- Candidates omitted mention of their opponent in
the e-mail messages. - Addressed the reader directly (62.1)
- Increase of candidate campaign e-mail messages
being sent during key campaign dates.
Trammell, Kaye and Paul Williams, Beyond Direct
Mail Evaluating Candidate E-Mail Messages in
the 2002 Florida Gubernatorial Campaign. Journal
of E- Government Vol 1, Issue 1 November 10,
2004.
18Effectiveness
- 2004 Bush
- Substance candidate as voice of people, standing
for hope, emphasizing political accomplishments. - Issue focused
- Twice the interactivity
- More promotion, less attack
- Consistent (increased) quantity over last half of
campaign
19Do these trends lead towards Obama Victory?
- Well just have to wait and see