Title: Time Series Econometrics
1Time Series Econometrics
2Ch7 Basics
- 1. Stochastic Processes
- 2. Stationarity Processes
- 3. Purely Random processes
- 4. Nonstationary Processes
- 5. Random Walk Models
- 6. Unit Root Tests
- 7. Cointegration and Cointegration Tests
- 8. Error Correction Mechanism
- 9. Granger Causality Test
3Background
- Regression analysis based on time series data
implicitly assumes that the underlying time
series are stationary. The classical t test, F
tests, etc. are based on this assumption. - In practice most economic time series are
nonstationary. (spurious/ nonsensical regression)
4Spurious Regression
- Regression of one time series variable on one or
more time series variables often can give
nonsensical or spurious results. - Spurious regression often shows a significant
relationship between variables, but in fact, this
kind of relationship does not exist. - This phenomenon is known as spurious
regression. - An is a good rule of thumb to
suspect that the estimated regression is
spurious.
51. Stochastic Processes
- A random or stochastic process is a collection of
random variables ordered in time. - The term stochastic comes from the Greek word
stochos, which means a target or bulls eye.
62. Stationary Stochastic Processes
- A stochastic process is said to be stationary if
its mean and variance are constant over time and
the value of the covariance between the two time
periods depends only on the distance or gap or
lag between the two time periods and not the
actual time at which the covariance is computed.
That is, they are time invariant. - In the time series literature, such a stochastic
process is known as a weakly stationary. A
stationary time series will tend to return to its
mean ( called mean reversion) and fluctuate
around this mean.
7Stationary Stochastic Processes, continued
- Properties of stationarity
- Let Yt be a stochastic time series
- Mean
- Variance
- Covariance
8Stationary Stochastic Processes, continued
- A time series is strictly stationary if all the
moments of its probability distribution and not
just the first two (i.e., mean and variance) are
invariant over time. If, however, the stationary
process is normal, the weakly stationary
stochastic process is also strictly stationary,
for the normal stochastic process is fully
specified by its two moments, the mean and
variance. - Nonstationary time series if a time series is
not stationary in the sense just defined, it is
called a nonstationary time series. In other
words, a nonstationary time series will have a
time-varying mean or a time-varying variance or
both. -
9Stationary Stochastic Processes, continued
- White Noise a special case of stationary
stochastic process. - We call a stochastic process purely random or
white noise if it has zero mean, constant
variance and is serially uncorrelated. -
-
-
- IID identically and independently
distributed -
103. Nonstationary stochastic process
- Random walk model (RWM) a classical example of
nonstationary time series - The term random walk is often compared with a
drunkards walk. Leaving a bar, the drunkard
moves a random distance ut at time t, and
continuing to walk indefinitely, will eventually
drift farther and farther away from the bar. The
same is said about stock prices. Todays stock
price is equal to yesterdays stock price plus a
random shock.
114. Unit Root Process
- If, , it becomes a RWM (without drift).
If is in fact 1, we face what is known as the
unit root problem, that is, a situation of
nonstationary we already know that in this case
the variance of Yt is not stationary. The name
unit root is due to the fact that . - Thus the terms nonstationarity, random walk, and
unit root can be treated as synonymous.
125. Spurious Regression Again
- If Y and X have unit roots then all the usual
regression results might be misleading and
incorrect. - One way to guard against it is to find out if the
time series are cointegrated. - An is a good rule of thumb to
suspect that the estimated regression is
spurious.
136.Tests of Nonstationarity
- How do we find out whether a given time series is
stationary? - At the informal level, weak stationarity can be
tested by the correlogram of a given time series.
- At the formal level, stationarity can be checked
by finding out if the time series contains a unit
root.
14Tests of Nonstationarity the correlogram test
- Autocorrelation function (ACF)
-
- The correlogram is a graph of autocorrelation at
various lags for a given time series - For stationary time series, the corelogram tapers
off quickly, whereas for nonstationary time
series it dies off gradually. - Q statistic
-
-
- testing the joint hypothesis that all the
up to certain lags are simultaneously equal
to zero.
15Tests of Nonstationarity the Unit Root Test
- The Unit Root Test
- If , then , that is we have a
unit root, meaning the time series under
consideration is nonstationary.
16Tests of Nonstationarity Dickey-Fuller (DF) Test
- The DF test is estimated in three different
forms. It was assumed that the error term was
uncorrelated.
17 Dickey-Fuller Test, continued
- Suppose Yt can be described by the following
equation - Using OLS to run the unrestricted regression
- Using OLS to run the restricted regression
-
or - Using the sums of squared residuals in the
restricted and unrestricted regressions to
calculate F statistic, then compare F value with
the critical value.
18Tests of Nonstationarity the Augmented Dickey-
Fuller (ADF) Test
- ADF test is developed if the are correlated.
-
- Under the circumstance, the unit root test
is run the same way as before.
197. Cointegration
- Regressing one random walk against another can
lead to spurious results. - Differencing variables before using them in a
regression may result in a loss of long-run
information. - Cointegration means that despite two or more time
series follow random walks, a linear combination
of them can be stationary. If this is the case,
we say that these time series are co-integrated. - The AEG,augmented Engle-Granger test,and other
tests can be used to find out whether two or more
time series are cointegrated. - Cointegration of two or more time series suggests
that there is a long-run, or equilibrium,
relationship between them.
20Testing for Cointegration ( ADF CRDW Tests)
- Testing whether there is a co-integrated
relationship between two time series. - Step 1 using the ADF test to confirm that
variables in the regression are random walks. - Step 2 using OLS to estimate the regression
equation - , then tests
whether the residuals from the above
co-integrating regression are stationary. - 1. Perform Augmented Dickey-Fuller unit
root test on the residual series to see if the
residual is stationary. - 2. Look at the Durbin-Watson statistic
from the above regression - , compare DW value
with the corresponding critical vale at proper
confidence level to decide whether reject or
accept the null hypothesis.
218. Error Correction Mechanism
- Granger representation theorem if two variables
Y and X are cointergated, then the relationship
between the two can be expressed as ECM, the
error correction mechanism. - where is the error obtained from the
regression model with Y and X (i.e.
) and is the error in the ECM
model. - The ECM says that depends on - an
intuitively sensible point (i.e. changes in X
cause Y to change). - In addition, depends on . This
latter aspects is unique to the ECM and gives it
its name. -
22Error Correction Mechanism, continued
- Remember that can be thought of an an
equilibrium error. If it is non-zero, then the
model is out of equilibrium. Consider the case
where and is positive. The
latter implies that is too high to be in
equilibrium (i.e. is above its equilibrium
level of ). Since the
term will be negative and so will
be negative. In other words, if is above
its equilibrium level, then it will start falling
in the next period and the equilibrium error will
be corrected in the model hence the term
error correct model. In the case where
the opposite will hold (i.e. is below its
equilibrium level, hence which causes to be
positive, triggering Y to rise in period t).
23Error Correction Mechanism, continued
- A distinctive feature of the model is that the
ECM has both long run and short run properties
built into it. - We use this error term, to tie the
short-run behaviour of Y to its long-run
value.The ECM developed by Engle and Granger is a
means of reconciling the short-run behaviour of
an economic variable with its long-run behaviour.
249. Causality in Economics the Granger Causality
Test
- The test involves estimating the following pair
of regressions
25Granger Causality Test, continued
- 1. Unidirectional causality from X to Y is
indicated if the estimated coefficients on the
lagged X in (1) are statistically different from
zero as a group and the set of estimated
coefficients on the lagged Y in (2) is not
statistically different from zero - 2. Conversely, unidirectional causality from Y to
X exists if the set of lagged X coefficients in
(1) is not statistically different from zero and
the set of the lagged Y coefficients in (2) is
statistically different from zero
26Granger Causality Test, continued
- 3. Feedback, or bilateral causality, is suggested
when the sets of X and Y coefficients are
statistically different from zero in both
regression - 4. Finally, independence is suggested when the
sets of X and Y coefficients are not
statistically significant in both the regression.
27Granger Causality Test, continued
- 1. Regress current Y on all lagged Y terms, but
not include the lagged X variables, obtain the
restricted residual sum of squares, RSSR. - 2. Run the regression including the lagged X
terms, obtain the unrestricted residual sum of
squares, RSSu - 3. The null hypothesis is , that
is, lagged X terms do not belong in the
regression.
28Granger Causality Test, continued
- 4. To test this hypothesis, we apply the F test
- Which follows the F distribution with m and
(n-k) df. m is equal to the number of lagged X
terms and k is the number of parameters estimated
in the unrestricted regression. - 5. If the computed F value exceeds the critical F
value at the chose level of significance, we
reject the null hypothesis, in which case the
lagged X terms belong in the regression. This is
another way of saying that X Granger-causes Y. - 6. Steps 1 to 5 can be repeated to test model 2,
that is, if Y Granger-causes X.