Title: Prejudice
1Assimilation and Pluralism From Immigrants to
White Ethnic to White Americans
Chapter Two
2Assimilation and Pluralism
- Assimilation is a process in which formerly
distinct and separate groups come to share a
common culture and merge together socially. - As a society undergoes assimilation, differences
among groups begin to decrease. - Pluralism, on the other hand, exists when groups
maintain their individual identities. - In a pluralistic society, groups remain separate,
and their cultural and social differences persist
over time.
3Assimilation and Pluralism
- In some ways, assimilation and pluralism are
contrary processes, but they are not mutually
exclusive. - They may occur together in a variety of
combinations within a particular society or
group. - Some segments of a society may be assimilating,
while others are maintaining (or even increasing)
their differences.
4Type of Assimilation
- Melting pot
- A process in which different groups come together
and contribute in roughly equal amounts to create
a common culture and a new, unique society
5Types of Assimilation
- Americanization or Anglo-conformity
- Rather than an equal sharing of elements and a
gradual blending of diverse peoples, assimilation
in the United States was designed to maintain the
predominance of the British-type institutional
patterns created during the early years of
American society
6Types of Assimilation
- Under Anglo-conformity, immigrant and minority
groups are expected to adapt to Anglo-American
culture as quickly as possible. - Americanization has been a precondition for
access to better jobs, education, and other
opportunities. - But Americanization has also created conflict,
anxiety, demoralization, and resentment.
7The Traditional Perspective on Assimilation
Theories and Concepts
- Robert Park and Race Relations Cycle
- Contact
- Competition
- Accommodation
- Assimilation
- Assumed that assimilation is inevitable in a
democratic and industrial society - In a political system based on democracy,
fairness, and impartial justice, all groups will
eventually secure equal treatment under the law.
8The Traditional Perspective on Assimilation
Theories and Concepts
- Milton Gordon, Assimilation in American Life
(1964) - Differentiated between
- Culture
- Social structure
- Primary networks
- Secondary networks
9Gordons Stages of Assimilation
10The Traditional Perspective on Assimilation
Theories and Concepts
- Human Capital Theory - Explains success achieved
by an individual in terms of individual
characteristics and abilities such as educational
level and skills. - More a status attainment theory (High levels of
affluence and occupational prestige are the
result of superior education that makes affluence
possible more so than being born into a
privileged status ) than assimilation theory - Incomplete in explaining status attainment as it
de-emphasizes structural factors in favor of
individual factors - Also assumes fairness in U.S. society
11Pluralism
- Horace Kallen (1915) rejected the notion of Anglo
conformity, which was inconsistent with democracy
and other core American values. - Evidence that full assimilation has not
materialized, even among European ethnic groups - Interest in pluralism has also increased due to
- Increasing U.S. diversity
- Global conflicts rooted in ethnic differences
- Multiculturalism has been and will be an ongoing
debate
12Types of Pluralism
- Cultural pluralism exists when groups have not
acculturated and each maintains its own identity. - Structural pluralism exists when a group has
acculturated but not integrated. That is, the
group has adopted the Anglo-American culture but
does not have full and equal access to the
institutions of the larger society. - Integration without acculturation reverses the
order of Gordons first two phases - Enclave establishes its own neighborhood and
relies on a set of interconnected business for
its economic survival and - middleman minorities relies on small shops and
retail firms, but the businesses are more
dispersed throughout a large area rather than
concentrated in a specific locale
13English Speaking Generations
14Other Group Relationships
- Separatism goes well beyond pluralism and exists
among groups in French Canada, Scotland,
Chechnya, Cyprus, southern Mexico, Hawaii, etc. - Revolution seeks to switch places with the
dominant group and become the ruling elite or
create a new social order
15Other Group Relationships
- Dominant groups may engage in forced migration or
expulsion, extermination or genocide, and
continued subjugation of the minority group.
16From Immigrants to White Ethnics
- A massive immigration from Europe began in the
1820s - They came as immigrants, became minority groups
upon their arrival , experienced discrimination
and prejudice in all its forms, went through all
the varieties and stages of assimilation and
pluralism, and eventually merged into the society
that had rejected them
17From Immigrants to White Ethnics
- Industrialization and Immigration
- Industrialization destroyed the traditional way
of life as it introduced new technology,
machines, and new sources of energy to the task
of production. In response, peasants began to
leave their home villages and move toward urban
areas - The first wave or Old Immigration came from
Northern and Western Europe in the 1820s the
second wave or New Immigration began arriving
from Southern and Eastern Europe in the 1880s
18From Immigrants to White Ethnics
- Northern and Western European immigrants included
English, Germans, Norwegians, Swedes, Welsh,
French, Dutch, and Danes. These groups were
similar to the dominant group in their racial and
religious characteristics and also shared many
cultural values with the host society, including
the Protestant Ethic. - Immigrants from Norway On a per capita basis,
Norway sent more immigrants to the U.S. before
1890 than any European nation except Ireland - Immigrants from Germany The stream of
immigration from Germany was much larger and
German Americans left their mark on the economy,
the political structure, and the cultural life of
their new land
19From Immigrants to White Ethnics
- Assimilation patterns By and large,
assimilation for Norwegian, German, and other
Protestant immigrants from Northern and Western
Europe was consistent with the traditional views
discussed earlier - Immigrant laborers from Ireland and Southern and
Eastern Europe these immigrant laborers came
in two waves the Irish took part of the Old
Immigration, while Italians and other Southern
and Eastern Europeans made up the New Immigration
20From Immigrants to White Ethnics
- Eastern European Jewish Immigrants and the Ethnic
Enclave Jewish immigrants from Russia and other
parts of Eastern Europe settled in the urban
areas of the Northeast and Midwest NY city was
the most common destination. - Unlike most European immigrant groups, Jewish
Americans became heavily involved in commerce and
often found ways to start their own businesses. - The enclave economy and the Jewish neighborhoods
established by the immigrants proved to be an
effective base from which to integrate into
American Society.
21From Immigrants to White Ethnics
- Chains of Immigration All of the immigrant
groups tended to follow chains established and
maintained by the members of their groups. - Someone from a village would make it to the
United States the successful immigrant would
send word to the home village within months,
another immigrant from the village, perhaps a
relative, would show up at the address of the
original immigrant
22The Campaign against Immigration Prejudice,
Racism, and Discrimination
- Anti-Catholicism Much of the prejudice against
the Irish and the new immigrants was expressed as
anti-Catholicism - Anti-Semitism Jews faced intense prejudice and
racism as they began arriving in large numbers in
the 1880s - The prejudice and racism direct against the
immigrants also found expression in organized,
widespread efforts to stop the flow of
immigration. The National Origins Act established
a quota system that limited the number of
immigrants that would be accepted each year from
each sending nation, a system that was openly
racist, allocating nearly 70 of the available
immigration slots to the nations of Northern and
Western Europe.
23Patterns of Assimilation
- The Importance of Generations - It takes time to
become completely Americanized. - First generation (immigrants) - Settled in ethnic
neighborhoods and make limited movement toward
acculturation and integration. Focused energies
on family and social relationships. - Second generation (children of immigrants) -
Psychologically or socially marginalized as part
ethnic, part American. Many experience conflict
between school and home worlds which reflected
different cultures. Enjoyed wider choices and
opportunities than their parents. - Third generation (grandchildren of immigrants) -
Usually born and raised in non-ethnic settings.
English is their first language. Ethnicity is a
minor part of their self-image. Attain high
levels of integration at secondary and primary
levels.
24Comparisons Between Italians and White
Anglo-Saxon Protestants (WASPs)
25Patterns of Assimilation
- Ethnic Succession
- A second factor that shaped the assimilation
experience is captured in the concept of ethnic
succession or the myriad ways in which European
ethnic groups unintentionally affected each
others position in the social class structure of
the larger society. - Politics After a period of acculturation and
adjust, the Irish began to create their own
connections with the mainstream society and
improve their economic and social position
26Patterns of Assimilation
- Ethnic Succession
- Labor unions The labor movement provided a
second link between the Irish, other European
immigrant groups, and the larger society. - Religion A third avenue of mobility for the
Irish and other white groups was provided by the
religious institution. - Other pathways besides party politics, the
union movement, and religion, European immigrant
groups forged pathways of upward mobility. - Sports
- Criminal Activity
27Patterns of Assimilation
- Continuing Industrialization and Structural
Mobility - Structural mobility resulted more from changes in
the structure of the economy and the labor market
than from any individual effort or desire to get
ahead
28Variations in Assimilation
- Degree of Similarity the degree of resistance,
prejudice, and discrimination encountered by the
different European immigrant groups varied in
part by the degree to which they differed from
these dominant group characteristics
29Variations in Assimilation
- The record numbers of Southern and Eastern
Europeans arriving in the New Immigration of the
early 20th century raised fears that U.S. cities
and institutions would be swamped by hordes of
what were seen as racially inferior,
unassimilable immigrants - Thus, a preference hierarchy was formed in U.S.
culture that privileged Northern and Western
Europeans over Southern and Eastern Europeans and
Protestants over Catholics and Jews. This
hierarchy of ethnic preference is still a part of
American prejudice, although it is much more
muted today - Ex the FHA
30Variations in Assimilation
- Religion - A major differentiating factor in
immigrant experiences. - Kennedy (1944) found the immigrant generation
chose marriage partners from a pool whose
boundaries were marked not just by ethnicity, but
also religion. As children and grandchildren of
immigrants married based on religion but less so
by ethnicity (i.e., a triple melting pot) - Herberg (1960) - Acculturation didn't affect all
aspects of ethnicity equally. European
immigrants wee encouraged to learn English, for
example, but not to change their religious
beliefs. Religion became a vehicle by which
immigrants could convey their ethnicity.
31Variations in Assimilation
- Social class - A central feature of social
structure that affected immigrants. - Gordon (1964) argued that the U.S. in the 1960s
had not three, but four melting pots, one for
each of the major ethnic/religious groups and one
for black Americans, which were subdivided by
class. Believed the intersection of
religious/ethnic and social class boundaries or
"ethclass" was the most significant structural
unit in U.S. society. - Social class affected structural integration.
32Variations in Assimilation
- Gender - Experiences of women immigrants recorded
less than were men's experiences. - Many immigrant women came from patriarchal
cultures and had less access than men to
leadership roles, education, and good
occupations. - Men immigrants outnumbered women immigrants.
- Women immigrants' experiences varied depending on
their country of origin. - Women also began the process or acculturation and
integration. For example, many Irish immigrants
were young single women who came to the U.S.
seeking jobs. - The type and location of women's employment
varied. Irish women, for example, concentrated
in domestic work and factories. Italian women
did tasks that could be done at home such a
laundry and piecework. Jewish women usually found
employment in the garment industry when they
worked outside the home. Often they worked in
small family-owned shops. - Women's wages tended to be about half of what men
earned.
33Variations in Assimilation
- Sojourners (Or birds of passage)
- Some immigrants had no intentional of becoming
American citizens and therefore had little
interest in Americanization.
34The Descendants of European Immigrants Today
- The largest ancestry group in the United States
is German American. - Integration and Equality - White ethnic groups
are today on the verge of being completed
assimilated. - The Evolution of White Ethnicity
- Hansens principle of third-generation interest
what the second generation tries to forget, the
third generation tries to remember - Ethnic revival a notable increase in the
visibility of an interest in white ethnic
heritage - The Twilight of White Ethnicity?
- Symbolic ethnicity or an aspect of self-identity
that symbolizes ones roots in the old country - Gallagher proposed addendum to Hansens
principle What the grandson wished to remember,
the great-granddaughter has never been told.
35Educational Attainment 1990
36Household Income and Families Living in Poverty
for White Ethnic Groups 1990
37Contemporary Immigrants Does the traditional
perspective apply?
- Assimilation today is fragmented or segmented and
will have a number of different outcomes some
groups will integrate in the middle-class
mainstream, others will find themselves
permanently mired in the impoverished, alienated,
and marginalized segments.
38Implications for Examining Dominant-Minority
Relations
- Minority group status has much more to do with
power and the distribution of resources than with
simple numbers or the percentage of the
population in any particular category.
39Comparative Focus Immigration, Emigration, and
Ireland
- Like the United States, Ireland finds itself
dealing with diversity and debating what kind of
society it should become. - The number of newcomers entering Ireland
increased by 5 times between the mid-1990s and
2007, to over 100,000, and the number of people
leaving decreased dramatically, to less than
25,000. - These numbers are miniscule compared to the
volume of immigrants received by the U.S. each
year, but the percentage of the Irelands
population that consists of immigrants (12) is
actually comparable to the United States (13)
40Comparative Focus Immigration, Emigration, and
Ireland
- The immigration is changing the racial
composition of Irish society. - Although still a small minority of the total
population, the number of Irish residents of
African descent has increased by a factor of 7
since 1996. Similarly, the number of Irish of
Asian descent increased by a factor of 6. - Although many Irish are very sympathetic to the
immigrants and refugees, others have responded
with racist sentiments and demands for exclusion,
reactions that ironically echo the rejection
Irish immigrants to the U.S. experienced in the
19th Century.
41Comparative Focus Immigration, Emigration, and
Ireland
- The rejection of non-Irish newcomers was
manifested in the passage of the Citizenship
Amendment to the Irish constitution, which was
overwhelmingly supported (80 in favor) by the
Irish electorate in June 2004. - Prior to the passage of the amendment, any baby
born in Ireland had the right to claim Irish
citizenship. - The amendment denied the right of citizenship to
any baby that did not have at least one Irish
parent and was widely interpreted as a hostile
rejection of immigrants. - One poll suggested that people supported the
amendment because they believed that there were
simply too many immigrants in Ireland.