Title: Chapter 11 The Number Theory Revival
1Chapter 11The Number Theory Revival
- Between Diophantus and Fermat
- Fermats Little Theorem
- Fermats Last Theorem
211.1 Between Diophantus and Fermat
- China, Middle Ages (11th -13th centuries)
- Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Pascals triangle
- Levi ben Gershon (1321)
- combinatorics and mathematical induction
(formulas for permutations and combinations) - Blaise Pascal (1654)
- unified the algebraic and combinatorial
approaches to Pascals triangle
3Pascals trianglein Chinese mathematics
The Chineseused Pascals triangle to find the
coefficients of (ab)n
4Pascals Triangle
5- As we know now, the kth element of nth row
is since - Thus Pascals triangle expresses the following
property of binomial coefficients
6- Indeed, suppose that for all n we have
- Then
- Letting k j 1
- in the second
- sum we get
- Knowing that C0n-11, Cn-1n-1 1 and replacing
j by k in the - first sum we obtain
7Combinations, permutations,and mathematical
induction
- Levi ben Gershon (1321) gave the formula for the
number of combinations of n things taken k at a
time - He also pointed out that the number of
permutations of n elements is n! - The method he used to show these formulas is very
close tomathematical induction
8Why Pascals Triangle ?
- Pascal demonstrated (1654) that the elements of
this triangle can be interpreted in two ways - algebraically as binomial coefficients
- combinatorially as the number of combinations of
n things taken k at a time - As application he solved problem of division of
stakes and founded the mathematical theory of
probabilities
9Pierre de Fermat Born 1601 in Beaumont (near
Toulouse, France) Died 1665 in Castres (France)
1011.2 Fermats Little Theorem
- Theorem (Fermat, 1640)If p is prime and n is
relatively prime to p (i.e. gcd (n,p)1) then np
1 1 mod p - Equivalently, np-1 1 is divisible by p if gcd
(n,p)1 ornp n is divisible by p (always) - Note Fermats Little Theorem turned out to be
very important for practical applications it is
an important part in the design of RSA code! - Fermat was interested in the expressions of the
form2m 1 (in connection with perfect numbers)
and, at the same time, he was investigating
binomial coefficients - Fermats original proof of the theorem is unknown
11Proof
- Proof can be conducted in two alternative ways
- iterated use of binomial theorem
- application of the following multinomial theorem
1211.3 Fermats Last Theorem
On the other hand, it is impossible for a cube
to be written as a sum of two cubes or a fourth
power to be written as a sum of two fourth powers
or, in general, for any number which is a power
higher than second to be written as a sum of two
like powers. I have a truly marvellous
demonstration of this proposition which this
margin is too small to contain. written by
Fermat in the margin of his copy of Bachets
translation of Diophantus Arithmetica
13- Theorem There are no triples (a,b,c) of positive
integers such thatan bn cn where n gt 2 is an
integer - Proofs for special cases
- Fermat for n 4
- Euler for n 3
- Legendre and Dirichlet for n 5,
- Lame for n 7
- Kummer for all prime n lt 100 except 37, 59, 67
- Note it is sufficient to prove theorem for all
prime exponents (except 2) and for n 4, since
if n mp where p is prime and an bn cn
then(am)p (bm)p (cm)p
14- First significant step (after Kummer)Proof of
Mordells conjecture (1922) about algebraic
curves given by Falting (1983) - Applied to the Fermat curve xn yn 1 for n gt
3, this conjecture provides the following
statement - Fermat curve contains at most finitely many of
rational points for each n gt 3 - Therefore, Faltings result imply that equation
an bn cn can have at most finitely many
solutions for each n gt 3 - The complete proof of Fermats Last Theorem is
due to Andrew Wiles and follows from much more
general statement (first announcement in 1993,
gap found, filled in 1994, complete proof
published in 1995)