Diapositive 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Diapositive 1

Description:

Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations J r me Martin Institut d Astrophysique de Paris (IAP) [In collaboration with K. Jedamzik & M. Lemoine, arXiv ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: Jerome103
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diapositive 1


1


Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical
Observations
Jérôme Martin
Institut dAstrophysique de Paris (IAP)
In collaboration with K. Jedamzik M. Lemoine,
arXiv1002.3039, arXiv1002.3278 and C.
Ringeval, arXiv1004.5525
2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • A brief and naive description of reheating
  • Constraining the reheating with the CMB
    observations
  • Preheating can it affect the behaviour of
    cosmological perturbations?
  • Production of gravitational waves during
    preheating
  • Conclusions

3
Hot Big Bang problems
Inflation is a phase of accelerated expansion
taking place in the very early Universe. The
scale factor is such that
This assumption allows us to solve several
problems of the standard hot Big Bang model
  • Horizon problem
  • Flatness problem
  • Monopoles problem

Usually ?3pgt0 (eg p0) and the expansion is
decelerated. Inflation requires negative
pressure
4
Inflation in brief
Inflation in a nutshell
Large field
  • Field theory is the correct description
  • at high energies.
  • A natural realization is a scalar field
  • slowly rolling down its flat potential
  • Inflation ends by violation of the
  • slow-roll conditions or by instability
  • After inflation, the field oscillates at the
  • bottom of its potential this is the reheating

Hybrid inflation
Small field
5
End of Inflation (I)
Oscillatory phase
p4
p2
Slow-roll phase
p4
p2
Violation of Slow-roll
6
End of Inflation (II)
Oscillatory phase
p4
p2
  • The field oscillates much faster
  • than the Universe expands
  • Equation of state
  • For p2

7
End of Inflation (III)
  • The previous model cannot describe
  • particle creation

  • G is the inflaton decay rate

8
End of Inflation (IV)
9
Reheating era
Oscillatory phase
p4
p2
Matter dominated era
Radiation-dominated era
10
Reheating era (II)
Consequences of reheating
  • So far we do not know so much on the reheating
    temperature, ie (can be
  • (improved the upper bound- if gravitinos
    production is taken into account)

  • ?endlt?rehlt?BBN
  • The previous description is a naive description
    of the infaton/rest
  • of the world coupling. It can be much more
    complicated.
  • Theory of preheating, thermalization etc
  • How does the reheating affect the inflationary
    predictions?
  • It modifies the relation between the physical
    scales now
  • and the number of e-folds at which perturbations
    left the
  • Hubble radius

11
Probing the reheating with CMB observations
12
Inflationary Observables
13
Parameterizing the Reheating (I)
Oscillatory phase
Describing the reheating
p4
p2
  • One needs two numbers, the mean equation
  • of state and the energy density at
    reheating.
  • In fact, for the calculations of the
    perturbation power
  • spectrum, one number is enough, the reheating
    parameter

14
Parameterizing the Reheating (II)
  • The reheating epoch can be described with a
    single parameter, the so-called reheating
    parameter it appears naturally in the equation
  • controlling the evolution of the perturbations

15
Parameterizing the Reheating (III)
If we are given a model, then the reheating epoch
is constrained
- Either one uses the constraint on the energy
density at the end of reheating to constrain N
  • Or we consider Rrad as a new free
  • parameter and we try to constrain
  • it using Bayesian techniques

16
Constraining the reheating (I)
Large field inflation
17
Constraining the reheating (II)
Large field inflation
18
Constraining the reheating (III)
Small field inflation
19
Constraining the reheating (IV)
Small field inflation
20
Constraining the reheating (V)
Small field inflation
21
Constraining the reheating (VI)
Large field inflation
Marginalized posterior probability distributions
Mean likelihoods
(flat prior) p2 0.2,5
Flat prior
22
Constraining the reheating (VII)
Large field inflation
(flat prior) p2 1,5
(flat prior) ?reh 2 ?nuc,?end
23
Constraining the reheating (VIII)
Small field inflation
(flat prior) p2 2.4,10
(flat prior) ln(?/MPl) 2 -1,2
24
Constraining the reheating (IX)
Small field inflation
25
Probing the reheating with Gravitational Waves
Observations
26
Cosmological Perturbations
Oscillatory phase
  • The cosmological perturbations are described
  • by the quantity (curvature perturbation)
  • The Mukhanov variable obeys the equation
  • of a parametric oscillator
  • The power spectrum is directly linked to CMB
  • anisotropy

p4
p2
27
Inflationary Power Spectrum
Exact (numerical)
2nd order sr
CMB window
1st order sr
28
Are perturbations affected by (pre)heating?
  • Equation of motion during preheating
  • Mathieu Equation

with
29
Are perturbations affected by (pre)heating?
Mathieu Instablity Card
unstable
stable
30
Are perturbations affected by (pre)heating?
Mathieu Instablity Card
unstable
stable
31
Resonance band
32
Are perturbations affected by (pre)heating?
  • Solution Floquet theory
  • Constant curvature perturbation
  • Early structure formation

µq/2 is the Floquet index
33
Solution in the resonance band
34
Haloes Formation
35
Haloes Formation (II)
A halo of mass M collapses when
no
Linear radius
Non-linearities become important
Inflaton halo evaporation
Virialization
36
GW Emission
  • At virialization, the halo emits GW with a
    frequency

Dynamical timescale at collapse ( is the
density of the halo at collapse)
37
GW Emission (II)
  • Energy density energy
  • emitted during the collapse of
  • perturbations corresponding to
  • mass between M and MdM

Number density of halos of mass between M and MdM
Luminosity
38
Gravitational Waves Production (II)
39
Gravitational Waves Production (III)
40
Conclusions
  • Reheating can affect the inflationary
    predictions
  • The reheating temperature can be constrained
    with the CMB
  • Observations one obtains a lower bound.
  • Preheating can affect the perturbations on small
    scales, even
  • in the single field slow-roll case
  • Production of gravitational waves potentially
    observable
  • Production of black holes?
  • Many things remain to be studied

41
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com