Entanglement of massive bodies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Entanglement of massive bodies

Description:

School of Physics and Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES Entanglement of massive bodies Vlatko Vedral University of Leeds, UK & – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: vlatkoved
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Entanglement of massive bodies


1
Entanglement of massive bodies
School of Physics and Astronomy FACULTY OF
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES
  • Vlatko Vedral
  • University of Leeds, UK
  • National University of Singapore

v.vedral_at_leeds.ac.uk
2
In collaboration with
  • Jacob Dunningham, Marcelo Terra Cunha and Libby
    Heaney (Leeds)
  • Also,
  • Janet Anders, Dago Kaszlikowski (Singapore) and
    Jenny Hide and Wonmin Son (Leeds).

See Many-body entanglement, Amico, Fazio,
Osterloh and Vedral, to appear in Rev. Mod. Phys.
(2007).
3
Motivation
  • Fundamental Classical/Quantum transition,
    Non-locality, Failure of QM
  • Many body physics information processing, new
    PTs, simulations

4
(No Transcript)
5
Atomic Beam Quantum Computer
P. Blythe and B.Varcoe New Journal of Physics,
8, 231 (2006)
6
An Atomic Beam Quantum ComputerMiniature
Microwave Resonators
7
Main message
Entanglement should be seen as between modes, not
just particles. Corollary We do not need two
particles to have entanglement. One will
suffice.
8
Particles not special
  • ?The term particle survives in modern physics
    but very little of its classical meaning remains.
    A particle can now best be defined as the
    conceptual carrier of a set of variates. . . It
    is also conceived as the occupant of a state
    defined by the same set of variates... It might
    seem desirable to distinguish the mathematical
    fictions from actual particles but it is
    difficult to find any logical basis for such a
    distinction. Discovering a particle means
    observing certain effects which are accepted as
    proof of its existence.??
  • A. S. Eddington, Fundamental Theory, (Cambridge
    University Press., Cambridge, 1942)?pp. 30-31.

9
Bosons at T0
Infinite range entanglement!
10
Bosons at T0
Infinite range entanglement!
11
Bosons at T0
Infinite range entanglement!
12
Bosons at T0
Infinite range entanglement!
13
Bosons at T0
Infinite range entanglement!
14
Bosons at T0
Infinite range entanglement!
15
Superposition Entanglement
16
Single particle atom entanglement
17
My Favourite Viva Question
How can we ever have a superposition?
True for Stern Gerlach, beam-splitters,
lasersanything.
18
But we dont know the phase!?
Who cares?
This is why preparation and read out are done
with the same laser (phase matching kind of
thing).
19
Single particle atom entanglement
20
Only One Mystery
Feynman There is only one mystery in quantum
mechanics Therefore Superposition
Entanglement ( Non-locality?)
Key observation Single particle superposition in
first quantisation
becomes mode entanglement in second.
(See Terra Cunha, Dunningham Vedral, to appear
Proc. Roy Soc. M. R. Dowling, S. D. Bartlett,
T. Rudolph and R. W. Spekkens, Phys. Rev. A
(2006)) Ashhab, Maruyama, Nori, Phys. Rev. A 75,
022108 (2007)
21
Conclusions
  • Single particle superposition, entanglement and
    nonlocality the same.
  • This is good news, since in quantum field theory
    particles are not
  • fundamental. Particle is just an excitation of a
    mode of some field,
  • therefore particles identical and there should be
    no fundamental
  • difference between one, two and more particles.
  • All entanglement mode entanglement.
  • Interesting question for mixed states is
    entanglement the same as
  • nonlocality? What about mixedness and
    entanglement?

22
Thanks to
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com