Cost Analysis Agenda - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Cost Analysis Agenda

Description:

Cost Analysis Agenda Cost Analysis Overview Requirement for Cost Analysis Cost & Pricing Data Cost Analysis Techniques Cost Proposal Example Cost Analysis Overview ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:219
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: NCI56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cost Analysis Agenda


1
(No Transcript)
2
Cost Analysis Agenda
  • Cost Analysis Overview
  • Requirement for Cost Analysis
  • Cost Pricing Data
  • Cost Analysis Techniques
  • Cost Proposal Example

3
Cost Analysis Overview
  • Price or Cost Analysis shall be evaluated in
    every source selection
  • Cost Analysis is the review and evaluation of
    separate cost elements and profit FAR
    15.404-1(c)
  • Cost Analysis shall be used when cost or pricing
    data is required. Cost Analysis may also be used
    to evaluate information other than cost or
    pricing data to determine cost realism

4
Cost Analysis Overview (cont.)
  • Cost Realism Analysis is the process of
    independently reviewing specific cost estimates
    to determine whether
  • The estimated costs are realistic
  • The requirements are clearly understood
  • The estimated costs are consistent with the
    technical proposal
  • Cost Realism Analysis must be performed on all
    cost type contracts

5
Requirement for Cost Analysis
  • Cost Analysis shall be used to evaluate cost or
    pricing data to determine cost reasonableness
  • Cost Analysis may also be used to evaluate
    information other than cost or pricing data
  • Cost Realism Analysis is required on all
    cost-reimbursement contracts to determine
    probable cost

6
Truth in NegotiationsKey Concepts
  • Cost or Pricing data is required by the
    Truth-in-Negotiations Act (TINA)
  • The purpose of TINA is to place the government
    and the contractor in an equal negotiating
    posture
  • The Act only requires disclosure

7
Cost Or Pricing Data
  • Cost or pricing data is
  • Factual, not judgmental information
  • Information that a prudent person would expect to
    have a significant effect on price
  • Verifiable information
  • Any facts available through the date of price
    agreement

8
Requirements of TINA
  • Disclose all cost or pricing data reasonably
    available as of the date of price agreement by
    submittal or specific identification
  • Merely making data available is not adequate

9
Cost or Pricing Data Not Required When
  • Contracting Officer (CO) determines that prices
    are based on adequate competition
  • CO determines that prices are set by law or
    regulation
  • When a commercial item is being acquired
  • Waiver by head of contracting activity
  • Modification to a commercial contract

10
Cost Pricing Data Required If
  • Contract Award / Subcontract / Modification gt
    550,000
  • NOTE Unless an exception applies, modifications
    of government contracts where the sum of the
    absolute values exceed 550,000 are subject to
    TINA because competition does not exist to ensure
    a fair and reasonable price.

11
Subcontractor Pricing Considerations
  • Prime Contractor is responsible for conducting
    cost
  • Prime contractor must obtain and analyze
    subcontractor cost or pricing data if the
    subcontract exceeds 550,000 unless it is exempt.
  • The prime contractor is responsible for ensuring
    that subcontractor cost or pricing data is
    updated as of the date of price agreement.

12
Key Dates Defective Pricing Risk
SOLICITATION
SUBMISSION
PRICE AGREEMENT
CONTRACT SIGNING
NEGOTIATION
PERFORMANCE
MEDIUM RISK
HIGH RISK
NO RISK
  • CRITICAL DATE

13
Certification Requirements
  • Contractor must certify that its cost or pricing
    data is accurate, complete and current as of the
    date of agreement on price
  • Certificate executed as soon as practicable after
    agreement on price, i.e. handshake date
  • Effective date on which data must be accurate,
    complete, and current is the handshake date
  • Absence of a certificate is not a defense to
    defective pricing allegations

14
Ramifications of Defective Pricing
  • Failure to comply with Truth In Negotiations
    requirements can lead to
  • Price reduction including cost, fee, interest on
    any overpayments and penalties (FAR 15.407-1)
  • Fraud investigation
  • Prosecution
  • Suspension or debarment

15
Cost Analysis Techniques
  • Assess reasonableness of proposed costs including
    allowances for contingencies
  • Projection of cost trends on the basis of current
    and historical cost
  • Reasonableness of estimates using parametric
    models or cost relationships
  • Application of negotiated or audited rates
  • Evaluating the effect of the offerors current
    practices on future costs
  • Comparison of costs proposed by the offeror for
    individual cost elements to actual costs,
    previous cost estimates, other cost estimates
    received, and independent technical estimates

16
Cost Analysis Techniques
  • Ensure the offerors costs are in accordance with
    FAR Part 31
  • Determine whether any other cost or pricing data
    is needed to make the proposal complete
  • Analyze the results of any make-or-buy program
    reviews

17
Information to Support Cost Analysis
  • Related contract files which may identify past
    problems and/or differences in contracting
    situations
  • Relevant audits and technical reports on similar
    items
  • Reviews of offerors systems
  • Purchasing
  • Accounting
  • Estimating
  • Industry cost estimating guides and standards

18
Analyzing Proposal Costs
  • Total contract cost
  • The sum of the direct and indirect costs
    allocable to the contract
  • Direct cost
  • Any cost that can be identified to one final cost
    objective (for example, direct labor)
  • Indirect cost
  • Any cost that benefits two or more cost objectives

19
Analyzing Proposal Costs Direct Labor
  • Does the proposed labor match the statement of
    work
  • Is the mix of labor correct
  • Was learning curve theory properly applied to
    labor estimates
  • Were appropriate labor rates applied
  • Is the justification for the estimated labor
    hours adequate
  • Were consistent formats used
  • If subject to the Service Contract Act and Davis
    Bacon Act were proper Wage Determinations used

20
Analyzing Proposal Costs Direct Material
  • Did the purchasing department obtain quotes
  • Were material requirements derived from the
    statement of work
  • Was a price analysis performed on all vendors
    selected for the proposal
  • Were appropriate learning curves applied to
    materials
  • Is the basis for the vendor selections adequately
    documented in the proposal

21
Analyzing Proposal Costs Other Direct
  • Are other direct costs clearly defined
  • Are there consistency problems with costs
    incurred for the same purpose
  • Are the other direct costs included in the
    proposal properly substantiated
  • Examples of ODCs
  • Travel
  • Service centers
  • Relocation

22
Analyzing Proposal Costs Indirect Costs
  • Does the allocation base reflect a causal or
    beneficial relationships between the activities
    in the pool and final cost objectives
  • Overhead
  • General and administrative expenses
  • Other intermediate pools or service centers
  • Does the base contain all the elements that
    should be in the base
  • Is the base understatedresult is an
    inappropriate high rate
  • Are pool expenses reasonable in amount and type?

23
Key Elements To Consider
  • In calibrating the amount of effort required for
    cost analysis consider
  • Reasonableness of prior proposals
  • Proper utilization of history
  • Active participation by subject matter experts
  • Understanding of the work
  • Existence of working business process

24
Indicators of Deficiencies
  • Indicators that additional effort may be
    required
  • Historical data not available or used
  • Failure to analyze material costs
  • Failure to perform subcontractor cost reviews
  • No analytical support for significant proposed
    costs
  • Excessive reliance on judgment
  • Recurring defective pricing for certain costs
    elements
  • Failure to integrate relevant parts from MIS
  • No policies and procedures for cost estimating

25
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com