Policy Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Policy Analysis

Description:

Policy Analysis What is Policy Analysis? Multi-element process of assess and analyzing components of a plan of action Not an exact science, more of an art Reviews the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:167
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 84
Provided by: PHHP
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Policy Analysis


1
Policy Analysis
2
What is Policy Analysis?
  • Multi-element process of assess and analyzing
    components of a plan of action
  • Not an exact science, more of an art
  • Reviews the component parts of an issue or
    problems
  • Considers new options.

3
What is Policy Analysis?
  • Multi-element process of assess and analyzing
    components of a plan of action
  • Not an exact science, more of an art
  • Reviews the component parts of an issue or
    problems
  • Considers new options.

4
Policy Analysis
  • New discipline
  • Dates to early 1960s
  • Policy analysis should
  • Improve decision making
  • Consideration of broad sets of alternatives
  • Use of more systematic tools

5
Policy Analysis
  • Neutral analysts
  • Consider all options
  • Advocates for best options serving national
    interest

6
1970s Amendments to the Legislative
Reorganization Act
  • Congressional declaration of analytic
    independence from the administrative branch
  • Created CBO, CRS, and OTA

7
Think Tanks
  • Originally, U.S.
  • Now world-wide
  • Have blended policy outside of political
    environment
  • Established by interest groups
  • Interest groups can adapt models developed by
    official sources

8
Evolution of Policy Analysis
  • Clients not only decision makers
  • Individuals stewarding institutional governance
  • Planning
  • Budgeting
  • Regulation

9
Office of Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation (ASPE)
  • ASPE
  • Principal policy advisor to the secretary
  • Policy coordination, legislation development,
    strategic planning, policy research and
    evaluation and economic analysis

10
Office of Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation (ASPE)
  • Use of office has varied with Administrations
  • Staff vary, initially Ph.D. economistsmany from
    DoD
  • Over time staff has varied
  • Staff now serves entire department
  • Also, other units have policy analysts, so ASPE
    is only one voice to Secretary

11
Office of Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation (ASPE)
  • Early methodology and analytic techniques relied
    on economic models
  • Evolution to reliance upon policy expertise of
    office vs. policy analysis

12
Needed skills for ASPE
  • Program knowledge
  • Statistics
  • Microeconomics
  • Cost-benefit analysis

13
Congressional Research ServiceCRS
  • Part of the Library of Congress
  • Most recent incarnation dates to 1970 Legislative
    Reorganization Act
  • Act allowed CRS to triple staff
  • Now _at_ 700 individuals
  • New staff teamed with experienced individuals

14
CRS
  • What is the legislative hook?
  • High volume, quick turnaround
  • a reference factory
  • Emphasis on legislative consultation,
    interdisciplinary work, anticipatory work

15
CRS
  • Provision of background papers to the committee
  • Assistance in design of congressional hearings
  • Suggestions of witnesses for hearings
  • Possible questions for Members to ask witnesses
  • Attend hearings to supplement questions

16
CRS
  • Consultation at mark-ups
  • Hearing testimony
  • Consultation on the floor as requested
  • Prepare conference agendas
  • Consultation at conferences

17
CRS
  • Most important role may be participation in
    creation of new legislation
  • Work not available to the public
  • Unless released by a Member

18
CRS
  • Varied products
  • Electronic briefing books
  • Background reports on topics
  • CRS staff also interacts with Members and staff

19
CRS
  • In-house capacity
  • Modeling
  • Create microsimulation models
  • Fiscal analyses
  • Culture emphasizes qualitative approaches and
    oral tradition

20
Heritage Foundation
  • Founded in 1973
  • Formulate and promote conservative policies based
    on principles of free enterprise, limited
    government, individual freedom, traditional
    Americans values and strong national defense
  • Seeks to differentiate itself from other
    conservative think tanks by focusing on
    influencing decisions very early in the process

21
Heritage Foundation
  • Established in 1973 with 9 staff
  • 1997 staff of 180
  • Added research staff in 1980
  • Funding from individual sponsors

22
Heritage Foundation
  • Has pushed boundary of tax exempt organizations
  • Replaced the Kennedy School orienting new
    conservative congressman
  • Focus on Congress --- members and staff

23
(No Transcript)
24
Health Policy
  • Peters (1999)
  • Pubic policy
  • sum of government activities, whether acting
    directly or through agents as it has influence on
    the life of citizens
  • Birkland (2001)
  • a statement by government of what it intends to
    do or not do, such as laws regulation, ruling,
    decision, or order as a combination of these

25
So, What is Health Policy?
26
Health Policy
  • Cochran and Malone (1995)
  • policitical decisions for implementing programs
    to achieve societal goals
  • Longest 2002
  • authoritative decisions made in the legislative,
    executive, or judicial branches of government
    that are intended to direct or influence the
    actions, behaviors, or decisions of others.

27
Policy and Health
  • When public policies or authoritative decisions
    refer to health it is health policy
  • Includes federal, state, and local government
  • Health policy affects classes of citizens
  • physicians, providers, consumers, the poor, the
    elderly

28
Health Policy
  • Authoritative
  • refers to decisions made in any part of
    government
  • all three branches

29
Health Policy
  • In the US Consists of many decisions, rather
    than one large decision
  • Other countries have integrated, coordinated
    health systems (Great Britain, Canada)

30
Health Policy
  • Laws
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Judicial Decisions

31
Health Policy by levels
  • Law
  • PL 89-97 1965 law establishing Medicare
  • Rule
  • Executive order establishing federally funded
    health centers

32
Health Policy by Levels
  • Judicial Decision
  • Court ruling that an integrated delivery systems
    acquisition of another hospital violates federal
    anti-trust
  • Regulation
  • County health departments procedure for
    inspecting restaurants
  • City governments ordinance banning smoking in
    public places

33
Laws
  • Laws enacted at any level of government
  • create policies
  • Laws passed at federal or state levels
  • federal laws 1983 Amendments to the Social
    Security Act (P.L. 98-21)
  • state laws govern professional practice

34
Health Policy and Markets
  • Capitalist countries such as the USA assume
  • markets are critical to production
  • consumption of health services

35
Health Policy Interventions
  • intervention needed when markets fail
  • party models have differing tolerance for market
    imperfection

36
Conditions for the Market
  • True markets require
  • buyers and sellers have adequate information to
    make informed decisions
  • large numbers of buyers and sellers
  • easy entry to the market
  • competitive products that can replace each other
  • adequate quantity of products

37
Health Policy Categories
  • Allocative Policies
  • provide net benefits to some at the expense of
    others
  • subsidies for medical education
  • rural hospital support
  • Medicare and Medicaid

38
Health Policy Categories
  • Regulatory Policies
  • policies designed to influence actions,
    behaviors, and decisions of others
  • market-entry restrictions
  • rate or price setting controls
  • quality controls
  • market preserving controls
  • social controls

39
Health Policy Categories
  • Regulatory Policies
  • market entry, rate controls, quality controls,
    market preserving controls are all economic
    regulation
  • social controls seek socially desired outcomes
    smoke free workplace, nondiscriminatory hiring
    practices

40
RegulatoryMarket-Entry Restrictions
  • State licensing laws
  • Planning programs
  • CON

41
Regulatory Price Setting
  • Out of vogue
  • Electric and gas utility control
  • PPS

42
Regulatory Quality
  • Food safety and quality standards
  • Medical Devices Amendments (P.L. 94-295) to the
    Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (P.L. 75-717)
  • placed medical devices under FDA

43
Regulatory Market Preserving
  • Health markets are not true markets this class
    of regulatory action addresses market
    imperfections
  • Sherman Anti-trust laws

44
State Health Policy
  • Dynamic balance between state and federal policy
  • Recent ascendance of state policy
  • failed national reform in 1994-1995
  • Medicaid growth

45
State Health Policy Roles
  • Lipson (1997)
  • financing or paying for several categories of
    people
  • public health
  • regulating health professions licensing and
    practice.

46
State Health Policy Roles
  • Financing
  • Medicaid
  • about 15 of most state budgets
  • State employee health benefits (large group when
    you consider teachers, employees, etc)
  • uninsured

47
State Health Policy Roles
  • Public Health
  • oldest most fundamental state health
    responsibility
  • States granted constitutional authority to
    establish laws to protect publics health and
    welfare
  • engages states in environmental protection
  • Federal government delegates to states
    responsibility for monitoring the environment
  • monitoring workplace and food safety

48
State Health Policy Roles
  • Professional Regulation
  • license various professionals
  • write practice acts
  • license and monitor compliance

49
State Health Policy Roles
  • States regulate the content, pricing and
    marketing of insurance plans
  • Under the McCarran-Ferguson Act (P.L. 79-15)

50
ERISA 1974
  • Enacted in 1974 to remedy fraud and mismanagement
    in private-sector pension plans.
  • ERISA preempts states regulation of pensions and
    self-insured plans
  • ERISA preemption broad language that supercedes
    all state laws relating to employee benefit plans
    sponsored by private sector employers or unions

51
ERISA
  • ERISA preempts states regulation of insurance
  • ERISA creates
  • self-insured plans which states cannot regulate
  • Insured health plans that states can affect
    indirectly through insurance regulation
  • Both are ERISA plans that states cannot directly
    regulate

52
ERISA
  • For 1st 20 years after passage, courts expansive
    view of ERISA
  • Court noted the reemption clause was expansive
    in its breadth
  • Overturned state laws that had any impact or
    referred to private sector employee plans

53
ERISA
  • 1995 Travelers Insurance decision
  • Narrowed ERISA preemption provision
  • Limiting types of state law that impacts the
    relate to private sector employer sponsored
    plans
  • Court held NYs hospital rate-setting law imposed
    surcharges on bills paid by insurers other than
    BCBS even though it increased costs for ERISA
    plans buying coverage from these insurers.

54
1995 Travelers Insurance decision
  • ERISA preemption
  • Designed to minimize employer-sponsored plans
    administrative and financial burdens of complying
    with conflicting local and state law
  • Court said the NY surcharges as having indirect,
    at best, economic effect on employer sponsored
    plans.

55
1995 Travelers Insurance decision
  • This case and several that followed
  • Show ERISA preemption does not condemn all types
    of state health legislation
  • As long as the state legislation is not directed
    at ERISA plans
  • Even if the law has an effect on an ERISA plan
  • Still prohibits states from mandating employers
    offer coverage

56
ERISA Allowable State Legislation
  • 1998 Massachusetts enacted pay or play
  • gt5 employees must pay a payroll finance tax
  • Credit for costs the employer actually funded
  • No effect on plans, but on the employer
  • Challenged by state restaurant association
  • Law was repealed

57
ERISA Pay or Play
  • Do not require employers to offer health coverage
    to their workers
  • Establish universal coverage funded in part by
    employers taxes
  • Do not refer to ERISA plans
  • Remain neutral on payroll tax or tax credit
  • Impose no conditions on employer coverage
  • Minimize administrative impacts on ERISA plans.

58
  • COBRA 1985 allows employees to purchase health
    coverage for 18 months post employment
  • 1996 HIPPA (P.L. 104-191)
  • allows employees guaranteed access to health
    coverage
  • company must provide benefits
  • premiums can be renewed assuming payment

59
State Laboratories
  • State viewed as health coverage laboratories
  • ability to implement local solutions to coverage
  • little evidence the laboratories actually design
    experiments with national implications
  • 50 individual markets
  • all politics are too local

60
State roles increasing
  • States may be too idiosyncratic
  • States still face large problems and increasing
    problems

61
Health Policy Policy vs Policy Objectives
  • Policies developed to achieve someones policy
    directives
  • The objectives shape health policy

62
Current US Health Policy Objectives
  • Adding years and quality to life
  • Eliminating disparities in health and access to
    health services
  • Improving quality of health services
  • Reducing cost of health services

63
Current US Health Policy Objectives
  • Eliminating environmental threats to health
  • Improving housing and living conditions
  • Improving economic conditions
  • Improving nutrition
  • Moderating consumption of food, drink and
    chemicals
  • Modifying unsafe sexual practices

64
Domain of Health Policy
  • Remarkably broad
  • physical Environment
  • biology
  • social
  • tax issues

65
Domain of Health Policy
  • Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
    Reconciliation Act (P.L. 104-193)
  • AKA Welfare Reform Act
  • modified welfare eligibility
  • also modified Medicaid eligibility for key
    welfare benefit
  • AFDC

66
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act (P.L. 104-193)
  • Replaced AFCD with Temporary Assistance to Needy
    Families (TANF)
  • TANF provided in state block grants
  • states provided broad flexibility to design
    support and work programs
  • states must impose time limits on support

67
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act (P.L. 104-193)
  • Allows AFDIC eligible families to enroll in
    Medicaid, but new identification methods are
    needed

68
Political Negotiation
  • Involves two or more parties bargaining
  • win/win
  • competitive -- win/lose

69
Political Negotiation
  • Cooperative Negotiating Strategies Work best
    when
  • goal of both negotiators is to attain fair,
    specific outcome
  • sufficient resources are available
  • both negotiators believe they can achieve fair
    outcome

70
Political Negotiation
  • Competitive Negotiation works best when
  • each negotiator want to achieve the most
    possible.
  • resources are not sufficient for both negotiators
    to achieve their goals.
  • both negotiators think it is impossible for both
    to succeed.
  • the intangible goal of both negotiators is to
    beat the other.

71
Economic Markets vs. Political Markets
  • Health policies all policy is made within
    political markets
  • operate much like traditional markets
  • Differ from traditional markets
  • no money exchanged
  • less direct relationship than traditional markets

72

Sellers Economic Exchanges in Market
Transactions Buyers
(Demanders)
(Suppliers)
73
Economic Markets vs. Political Markets
  • Demand for health policy markets
  • knowledgeable individuals
  • organizations
  • organized interest groups
  • AMA
  • AARP
  • AAHP
  • PhRMA

74
Benefits of Interest Groups Ambiguous
  • James Madison The Federalist Papers in 1788
  • described groups he labeled factions
  • Madison felt factions were inherently bad
  • mischiefs of the factions must be contained by
    setting it against other groups ambitions

75
Pluralist Perspective
  • Everyones interests represented in one or more
    interest groups
  • View interests groups as positive
  • Interest groups provide linkages among people and
    government
  • Interest groups compete for outcomes creates
    counterbalanced vectors
  • No group will become too dominant

76
Pluralist Perspective
  • Groups must rely on political power bases
  • Groups representing concentrated economic
    interests must have money
  • Groups representing consumer groups must have
    members

77
Interest Groups
  • More than 22,000 in US
  • concern with pluralist perspective
  • all 22,000 groups given legitimacy

78
Interest Groups Have Power
  • Lowi labeled interest group liberalism
  • to address excessive deference to interest groups
  • Edwards, Wattenberg Lineberry, 2001
  • Hyperplualism

79
Interest Groups have Power
  • Critics
  • Interest groups too influential
  • responding to interest groups creates conflicting
    policy
  • Government tries to satisfy conflicting groups
    with policy satisfying all groups

80
Elitist
  • Models argues those who control key institutions
    have power
  • act as gatekeepers for public policy process
  • take powerful roles in nations economic and
    social systems thereby overly controlling policy

81
Elitist Model
  • Real power lies within only a few groups
  • Members of the power elite share a consensus or
    near consensus on basic values
  • private property rights
  • preeminence of markets
  • best way to organize
  • limited government
  • role of individual liberty

82
Elitist
  • Protect power base

83
What Must Health Care Reform Accomplish?
  • Restrain cost
  • Create access and equity
  • Improve quality
  • Promote health
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com