Qualitative Political Analysis Philosophies of science and social science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Qualitative Political Analysis Philosophies of science and social science

Description:

Qualitative Political Analysis Philosophies of science and social science Ben Worthy B.Worthy_at_bbk.ac.uk * Democracy Democracy was associated with mob rule until ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:296
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: TheConsti7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Qualitative Political Analysis Philosophies of science and social science


1
Qualitative Political Analysis Philosophies of
science and social science
  • Ben Worthy
  • B.Worthy_at_bbk.ac.uk

2
Overview
  • Theory
  • Ontology
  • Epistemology
  • Doing research

3
Research Methods
  • What have you used?

4
Research Methods
  • Studies of Freedom of Information
  • Central and local government, Parliament,
    Universities
  • Looked at
  • Met objectives
  • Impact on how bodies function

5
Research Methods
  • Mixed methods
  • Interviews
  • Media analysis
  • Surveys
  • Case law
  • Use of FOI

6
Theory
  • Answer to most questions
  • Name a theory
  • Building block of ideas
  • Can be a grand idea or a medium order or
    hypothesis (Bryman 2008).

7
Underlying theory Explaining phenomena
  • Social research (mostly) deals with these
    questions
  • What is happening? Descriptive analysis
  • Why is it happening? Causal analysis
  • How can we make (better) things happen (better)?
    Normative analysis
  • These can be answered using either quantitative
    (numbers) or qualitative (language) approaches.
  • The difference is the way we think about the
    questions, the methods to get our answers, and
    interpreting our results.

8
Building blocks of research
Ontology
Whats out there to know? How does it exist?
Epistemology
What how can we know about it?
Methodology
How do we acquire valid knowledge?
Methods
Which procedures can we use to acquire it?
Sources
Which data can we collect?
Grix, J., 2004 The Foundations of Research p. 66
9
Ontology and epistemology
  • How does the world exist? In our case, how does
    the social world exist?
  • How do we come to know what exists?
  • Which method(s) we use to try to evaluate our
    theory will depend upon how we perceive the
    world.
  • The first bullet point is a question of ontology,
    the second, a question of epistemology and the
    third a question of methodology.

10
Ontology "What exists?"
  • What is existence?
  • What does it mean to say something does not
    exist?
  • What is an object?
  • Can one give an account of what it means to say
    that an object exists?
  • The great divide foundationalist vs.
    anti-foundationalist
  • Table? University?

11
Ontology
  • Burr (2003) provides three different definitions
    of reality used in ontological debates
  • Reality as truth versus falsehood
  • Reality as materiality versus illusion
  • Reality as essence versus construction

12
A quick word about terms
  • Bryman uses objectivism and constructionism
    as ontological terms
  • Grix uses foundationalism and
    anti-foundationalism.
  • Burr (2003) uses social constructionism to
    refer to a set of approaches to the study of
    human behaviour (epistemological use)

13
Ontology
  • Foundationalism or Bryman (2004) objectivism
  • reality exists independent of our knowledge of
    it.
  • true knowledge must rest upon a set of firm,
    unquestionableindisputable truths from which our
    beliefs may be logically deduced, so retaining
    the truth value of the foundational premises from
    which they follow, (Hughes and Sharrock 1997,
    p.4-5).
  • social phenomena and their meaning have
    existence independent of actors, (Bryman, p.16).
  • Breaks up into different groups Positivists vs.
    realists

14
Ontology
  • Antifoundationalism/Constructivism do not
    believe the world exists independent of our
    knowledge of it
  • reality is socially constructed by human
    actors
  • there are no central values that can be
    rationally and universally grounded.
  • the researcher always presents a specific
    version of social reality, rather than one that
    can be regarded as definitive. Knowledge is
    viewed as indeterminate, (Bryman, p.17).
  • Breaks up into different areas e.g. ethnography
    i.e. thick description vs. post-modernists

15
Burr Social Constructionism
  • Stems from Postmodernism-no underlying truth
  • Critical stance towards taken fro granted (e.g.
    men/women vs. ear lobes)
  • Historical and cultural specificity e.g.
    parenting in Dickens
  • Knowledge is constructed from social processes
    and the two go together and change e.g. alcoholism

16
Task
  • What is a personality?

17
Burr Social Constructionism
  • Personality is (a) essential (b) stable
  • But does it exits at all? Evidence? Only
    expressed through words (e.g. love)
  • Is behaviour the same i.e. pub vs. great uncle?
  • Actually most attributes shared with others e.g.
    friendly, shy etc

18
Ontology
  • Example 10 note

19
(No Transcript)
20
Life and Death
  • Dispute over life (abortion debate)
  • Different clinical definitions of death.
  • In the UK no statutory clinical definition of
    death
  • Brain death (no activity) vs. vegetative state
  • Organ donation
  • Cryonics information theoretic death i.e.
    personality

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Ontology Why should we care?
  1. The types of questions they ask
  2. What epistemology they will adopt in trying to
    answer those questions and
  3. The method they will use to investigate that
    answer.
  4. How they interpret their results.

25
Epistemology
  • Epistemology what is (or should be) regarded
    as acceptable knowledge in a discipline, Bryman,
    p. 11.
  • Positivism quantitative methodologies (use of
    surveys, experiments, statistical analysis)
  • Realism- used quantitative methods but also
    certain hidden influences
  • Interpretivism qualitative methodologies (use
    of focus groups, interviews, analysis of text and
    language)

26
Positivist Popper
  • Use of conjectures and refutations-able to
    falsify something
  • Idea of objectivity and social sciences matching
    natural
  • Open Society

27
Realist Marx
  • Idea of laws of history
  • World was measurable and a single truth existed
  • Historical materialism
  • Some things are hidden from view or measurement
    e.g. false consciousness

28
Interpretivist Foucault
  • All had meaning in historical context
  • Dominant discourse and social narrative
  • Concepts used, abused and shifted over time
  • e.g. madness abused to persecute as was justice
    and equality

29
Positivism
  • Hume outlined two types of knowledge, one based
    on facts the other on values.
  • Empirical knowledge (facts) is knowledge of the
    observable world and based upon sensory
    perceptions.
  • Normative knowledge is based on values and
    beliefs, informed by individual preferences.
    Because it is subjective, Hume asserted it can
    provide no basis for science (as we can say
    nothing certain about this type of knowledge).
  • Can only be sure of facts based on experience
  • Humans have a tendency to presume
    regularity/uniformity
  • But can you ever know anything?

30
Positivism (20th century)
  • Only scientific knowledge is authentic knowledge
  • Scientific knowledge only comes through the use
    of strict scientific method.
  • World is measurable
  • What distinguishes the scientific from the
    pseudo-scientific?
  • Positivists argued all scientific statements
    could phrased in such a way that they could be
    shown to be wrong and tested (Popper).
  • The null hypothesis

31
Has Obama changed America?
32
Interpretivism/Constructivism
  • In contrast with natural phenomena, social
    phenomena are mutable, contain varied
    perspectives.
  • Nietzsche, Kant (and others) pointed out the
    world is fundamentally disordered and it is the
    observer who imposes intelligibility upon it.
  • About narratives, discourse and particular
    contexts
  • Focus on meaning and understanding
  • Double hermeneutic

33
Democracy?
  • Is Democracy always been a good thing?

34
Democracy
  • Democracy was associated with mob rule until
    the end of 18th century,
  • Now it is seen as most desirable form of
    government in many countries
  • Venezuela?
  • North Korea? China?

35
Interpretivism/Constructivism
  • Interpretivism is the epistemological perspective
    which follows from an antifoundationalist
    perspective.
  • social phenomena and their meanings are
    continually being accomplished by social actors,
    (Bryman, p. 17).
  • The researcher is presenting a specific version
    of social reality and trying to understand how
    others react and understand social phenomena.
  • Interpretivism in social science is most often
    associated with the use of qualitative
    methodology and qualitative methods.
  • Habermas, Frankfurt School, Foucault ,
    ethnographers thick description

36
How things are socially produced
  • Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
    (1970) scientists are not as open minded as
    claimed.
  • Revolution occurs when dominant paradigm breaks
    down, results produce inconvenience facts

37
Newtonian physics to quantum theory
38
(No Transcript)
39
Time Arrow or Wheel?
40
Has Obama changed America?
41
Concluding thoughts?
  • Deep divisions between two strands-irreconcilable
    and very different ideas
  • Yet vital-shape questions, methods, way of
    understanding the world.
  • Nuance within each

42
Social Research
  • Values
  • Ontology
  • Theory
  • Practical considerations
  • Epistemology
  • (Bryman 2008)

43
Doing research
  • Choice of research (why? Interesting vs.
    practical)
  • Research Questions (precision? Too big?)
  • Choice of measurement (need depth)
  • Formulate research design
  • Data collection (long time)
  • Analysis
  • Interpret (link to theory!)
  • Conclude

44
Common Issues
  • Too big a question
  • Lack of theory
  • Lack of objectivity
  • Research question to method link
  • Proving a positive
  • Flexibility
  • Conclusion?

45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
Somalias Best Bet?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com