MARIS-FUTURREG Exploring Regional Innovation Futures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

MARIS-FUTURREG Exploring Regional Innovation Futures

Description:

Exploring Regional Innovation Futures. Scanning Science Popularisation Futures ... Since 1950's Futures studies or 'futurology' has not been considered an ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: peterm96
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MARIS-FUTURREG Exploring Regional Innovation Futures


1
MARIS-FUTURREG Exploring Regional Innovation
Futures
Scanning Science Popularisation Futures Bighi,
24 October 2007 FUTURREG Malta
Introduction to Futures Studies and
Tools Jennifer Cassingena Harper
MARIS-FUTURREG Exploring Regional Innovation
Futures
2
Future Studies
  • Future studies is a discipline that includes all
    forms of looking into the future, from trend
    extrapolation to utopia. (McHale). It is a study
    of the ways in which futures can happen.
  • Future studies are the systematic identification
    and study of alternative futures to enhance our
    ability to identify the opportunities and
    mitigate the risks which alternative futures
    present.
  • Future may be defined as a time to come an array
    of possibilities emerging from conditions in the
    present.
  • Forecast is an estimate of what might happen in
    the future - a likely occurrence, a description
    of a possible future based on the collection,
    analysis and synthesis of available pertinent
    data.
  • Source Prospectiva

3
Foresight Science or Art
Source FOREN Guide
4
Foresight - Science or art?
  • Foresight is an approach at overlap of three
    converging trends
  • since mid-1990s (Miles)
  • Futures Studies shift from predictive to
    exploratory approaches, iteration and involvement
    of users for embedding /implementation.
  • Since 1950s Futures studies or futurology
    has not been considered an objective science but
    an art, a composition of imagination and
    subjective certainties . an individual and a
    community not to speak about the whole mankind
    do not have only one future but indeterminately
    many possible, alternative ones. (Jouvenel
  • Strategic Planning shift from rational to
    evolutionary approaches, uncertainty is the norm,
    economic progress linked to disruptive
    innovations, qualitative vs quantitative changes
    within stable structures long-term planning
    discredited but still needed.
  • Policy Analysis shift to open, participatory
    approach, knowledge is distributed and
    policy-makers have to find ways to capture it.

5
Defining Foresight
  • What Foresight is NOT
  • An approach for predicting the future (prediction
    implies knowing aspect(s) of the future with
    certainty and precision. This is not possible in
    social contexts with qualitative rather than
    quantitative factors predominating).
  • A Panacea or universal cure

6
Foresight is traditionally defined as
  • A tool or set of tools used to survey as
    systematically as possible what chances for
    development and what options for action are open
    at present, and then follow up analytically to
    determine to what alternative future outcomes the
    developments would lead 1
  • 2. More recently, it has been recognized that
    foresight is more than just a set of tools, and
    involves a process whereby the tools are just one
    element, interacting with human inputs of
    intellect, expertise and sector-specific
    knowledge. a process - a systematic,
    participatory, future intelligence-gathering and
    medium-to-long-term vision-building process2
  • 1 Martin B.R and Irvine J. (1989) Research
    Foresight Priority-Setting in Science
  • 2 EU FOREN - Foresight for regional
    developmentFORENA Practical Guide to Regional
    Futures http//foren.jrc.es/

7
The human dimension
  • But foresight is essentially embodied in the
    actors involved in its design and implementation
    and may thus also be defined in relation to two
    key human attributes
  • 3. foresight as a philosophy or particular
    mindset/approach to life evident at the
    individual or group level. It separates the
    proactive from the reactive, the path-dependent
    from the path-breakers.
  • 4. foresight as a capacity for contemplating,
    anticipating and coping with the future also
    evident at the individual or group level. It
    entails a set of skills which can be taught but
    presumes a mindset open to creative thinking and
    proactive exploration of the future.

8
Actors in the spotlight
Source adapted from Georghiou, 2003
9
Strategic Futures Analysis
  • Characteristics
  • Structured, evidence-based process
  • Wide range of analytical tools
  • Resilient and innovative strategies
  • Neutral space for challenge
  • Encourages broader dialogue

Source Future Generation
10

Quantitative Tools (use of statistics and other data) to elaborate future trends and impacts Trend extrapolation Simulation modelling Cross impact analysis System dynamics
Qualitative Tools (drawing on expert knowledge) to develop long term strategies Delphi method Experts panels Brainstorming Mindmapping Scenario analysis workshops SWOT analysis
Tools to identify key points of action to determine planning strategies Critical/ key technologies Relevance trees Morphological analysis
Source FOREN
11
Types of Tools
  • Quantitative Tools provide numerical
    representation of future developments, e.g.
    forecasts and modelling. They give a great deal
    of weight, an ability to examine rates and scales
    of changes but they limit the comprehension of
    social and political variables and are not always
    reliable.
  • Qualitative Tools vary from creative thinking to
    more systematic techniques. Used when data are
    hard to collect or not available.
  • Foresight can never be completely dominated by
    quantitative methods the mix depends on access
    to relevant expertise and the nature of the
    issues.

12
Types of Tools
  • Exploratory Tools (outward bound) start from
    the present and move forward to examine kinds of
    alternative future developments it can lead to.
    Look at implications of possible developments
    that lie outside familiar trends What if methods
  • Normative Tools (inward bound) start with the
    creation of a preliminary view of possible
    (preferred) futures, then an analysis of how
    these futures may grow out of the present -
    asking what trends and events would take us there
    or can be avoided. How methods.

13
Tools by Phases
  • Define the problemspecific challenges and needs,
    e.g. a longer-term innovation strategy), set
    the time horizon.
  • Methods Panels, SWOTs or brain-storming,
  • 2. Scope -possible focus on specific sectors,
    bottom-up vs top-down, extent and structure of
    consultation (experts/non-experts), resources,
    choosing appropriate methods.
  • 3. Identify the key variables analysing the
    relations between variables, by placing them in
    matrix to identify drivers.
  • Methods panels/ interviews/desk-based
    research/specialised studies/ cross-impact
    analysis influence and dependency graph.
  • Gathering data on trends and drafting hypotheses.
  • Methods trend analysis, simulation modelling,
    weak signals.
  • 5. Exploring possible future through
    scenario-building
  • Methods Exploratory or Normative
    approaches, panels

14
Popular Tools Expert panels Scenarios
baseline, success scenarios and disruption
scenarios On-line fora and delphi Horizon
scanning Creativity sessions Future Dialogues
15
Popular Methods Worldwide (EFMN)
16
Multi-use of Methods
17
Blends of social themes and policy concerns
A balance of qualitative and quantitative for
robust, evidence-based results Creative
process for creative product Adaptive foresight
and context-based learning
Hybrid Approaches
18
Year Delphi Mixed Panel/Scenario/Roadmapping etc
1971- 1st 4 Japanese STA surveys
1989 Ministry of Economic Affairs Netherlands
1990 1st German
1991 5th Japanese Critical Technologies USA
1992 Public Good Science Fund New Zealand
1993 South Korea Technologies at Threshold of 21st Century Germany
1994 France Japan/Germany Mini Delphi
1995 1st UK Foresight Programme 100 Key Technologies France
1996 Japan-German Delphi Matching ST to Future Needs Australia Foresight Steering Committee Netherlands
1997 ANEP Spain Foresight Ireland
1998 Austria TEP Hungary South Africa New Zealand 1st Swedish Foresight Brazil 2020
1999 ITC Foresight Thailand 2nd UK TF Programme Futur 0 Germany 2nd 100 Key Techs France
19
Year Delphi Mixed Panel/Scenario/Roadmapping
2000 7th Japanese Prospectar Brazil Technology Foresight Programme Brazil ET2000 (Portugal) IPTS Futures EU
2001 Technology Foresight Chile Futur 1 Germany Technology Foresight Greece TF Exercise Czech
2002 3rd UK Programme eForesee (Cyprus, Estonia, Malta) 2nd Swedish TF National Technology Foresight Denmark NIH Roadmap USA
2003 Foretech (Bulgaria, Romania) 2nd Swedish Foresight Norwegian Research Council 2020 studies
2004 8th Japanese Futuris France ANRT France AGORA 2020 France Nordic Hydrogen energy foresight
2005 3 Moments Brazil Finnsight Finland 21st Century Challenges GAO USA
2006 SITRA Foresight Finland
20
References
  • http//forera.jrc.es/fta/intro.html
  • http//www.efmn.info
  • http//cordis.europa.eu/foresight/home.htm
  • http//www.eranet-forsociety.net/ForSociety
  • http//www.costa22.org/
  • http//forlearn.jrc.es/index.htm
  • http//www.unido.org/doc/12296
  • http//www.futurreg.net/
  • http//www.acunu.org/millennium/
  • http//www.theworldcafe.com/
  • http//www.futuresearch.net/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com