Categories of Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 57
About This Presentation
Title:

Categories of Research

Description:

Research Methods Categories of Research * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Social Constructivism ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:202
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: x1176
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Categories of Research


1
Research Methods
  • Categories of Research

2
Categories of Research
  • There are many different ways to classify
    research
  • By type
  • By objective
  • By form
  • By reasoning

3
Categories of Research
  • By type
  • Primary research, collection of data that does
    not yet exist
  • Secondary research, summary, collation and/or
    synthesis of existing research

4
Categories of Research - Type Primary Research
  • Also called field research.
  • It involves the collection of data that does not
    already exist, which is research to collect
    original data.
  • Primary Research is often undertaken after the
    researcher has gained some insight into the issue
    by collecting secondary data.
  • This can be through numerous forms of data
    collection, including questionnaires, direct
    observation and interviews amongst others.

5
Categories of Research - Type Secondary Research
  • Also called desk research.
  • It involves the summary, collation and/or
    synthesis of existing research rather than
    primary research, where data is collected from,
    for example, research subjects or experiments.
  • The principal methodology in secondary research
    is the systematic review, commonly using
    meta-analytic statistical techniques, although
    other methods of synthesis, like realist reviews
    and meta-narrative reviews, have been developed
    in recent years.
  • Secondary research can come from either internal
    or external sources.
  • The proliferation of web search engines has
    increased opportunities to conduct secondary
    research.

6
Categories of Research
  • By objective
  • Qualitative research, understanding of human
    behaviour and the reasons that govern such
    behaviour
  • Quantitative research, systematic empirical
    investigation of quantitative properties and
    phenomena and their relationships
  • Mixed methods research, uses a combination of
    quantitative and qualitative methods for data
    collection and analysis.

7
Categories of Research Objective Qualitative
Research (1/2)
  • It aims to gather an in-depth understanding of
    human behaviour and the reasons that govern such
    behaviour.
  • The qualitative method investigates the why and
    how of decision making, not just what, where,
    when.
  • Hence, smaller but focused samples are more often
    needed.
  • Qualitative methods produce information only on
    the particular cases studied, and any more
    general conclusions are only hypotheses
    (informative guesses).
  • Quantitative methods can be used to verify which
    of such hypotheses are true.

8
Categories of Research Objective Qualitative
Research (2/2)
  • Helps us flesh out the story and develop a deeper
    understanding of a topic.
  • Often contrasted to quantitative research.
  • Together they give us the bigger picture.
  • Good examples of qualitative research are
    face-to-face interviews, focus groups and site
    visits.

9
Categories of Research Objective Quantitative
Research (1/2)
  • It refers to the systematic empirical
    investigation of quantitative properties and
    phenomena and their relationships.
  • The objective of quantitative research is to
    develop and employ mathematical models, theories
    and/or hypotheses pertaining to phenomena.
  • The process of measurement is central to
    quantitative research because it provides the
    fundamental connection between empirical
    observation and mathematical expression of
    quantitative relationships.

10
Categories of Research Objective Quantitative
Research (2/2)
  • Involves information or data in the form of
    numbers.
  • Allows us to measure or to quantify things.
  • Respondents dont necessarily give numbers as
    answers - answers are analysed as numbers.
  • Good example of quantitative research is the
    survey.

11
Categories of Research Objective Mixed Methods
Research
  • Using a combination of quantitative and
    qualitative methods for data collection and
    analysis.
  • Capitalises on the strengths of each approach and
    offsets their different weaknesses.
  • Also provides a more comprehensive answer to
    research questions, going beyond the limitations
    of a single approach.

12
Categories of Research
  • By form
  • Exploratory research, which structures and
    identifies new problems
  • Constructive research, which develops solutions
    to an existing problem
  • Empirical research, which tests the feasibility
    of a solution using empirical evidence

13
Categories of Research - FormExploratory
Research
  • It is a type of research conducted for a problem
    that has not been clearly defined.
  • Exploratory research helps determine the best
    research design, data collection method and
    selection of subjects.
  • It should draw definitive conclusions only with
    extreme caution.
  • Given its fundamental nature, exploratory
    research often concludes that a perceived problem
    does not actually exist.

14
Categories of Research - Form Constructive
Research
  • It is very commonly used in computer science
    research.
  • The term construct is often used in this
    context to refer to the new contribution being
    developed.
  • The construct can be a new theory, algorithm,
    model, software, or a framework.
  • This type of approach demands a form of
    validation that doesnt need to be quite as
    empirically based as in other types of research
    like exploratory research.
  • Nevertheless the conclusions have to be
    objectively argued and defined.
  • This may involve evaluating the construct being
    developed analytically against some predefined
    criteria or performing some benchmark tests with
    the prototype.

15
Categories of Research - Form Empirical Research
  • A way of gaining knowledge by direct observation
    or experience.
  • It is used to answer empirical questions, which
    must be precisely defined and answerable with
    data (e.g., "Does listening to music during
    learning have an effect on later memory?").
    Usually, a researcher has a certain theory
    regarding the topic under investigation. Based on
    this theory some statements, or hypotheses, will
    be proposed (e.g., "Listening to music has a
    negative effect on learning."). From these
    hypotheses predictions about specific events are
    derived (e.g., "People who study while listening
    to music will remember less on a later test than
    people who study in silence.").
  • These predictions can then be tested with a
    suitable experiment.
  • Depending on the outcomes of the experiment, the
    theory on which the hypotheses and predictions
    were based will be supported or not.

16
Categories of Research
  • By reasoning
  • Deductive reasoning, is going from the general to
    the specific
  • Inductive reasoning, is going from the specific
    to the general

17
Categories of Research Reasoning Deductive
Reasoning
  • Going from the general to the specific
  • E.g.
  • 1. All men are mortal. (premise)2. Socrates was
    a man. (premise)3. Socrates was mortal.
    (conclusion)
  • Thus, the conclusion follows necessarily from the
    premises and inferences. In this way, it is
    supposed to be a definitive proof of the truth of
    the claim

18
Categories of Research Reasoning Inductive
Reasoning
  • Going from the specific to the general
  • e.g.
  • 1. Socrates was Greek. (premise)2. Most Greeks
    eat fish. (premise)3. Socrates ate fish.
    (conclusion)
  • An inductive argument is one in which the
    premises are supposed to support the conclusion
    in such a way that if the premises are true, it
    is probable that the conclusion would be true.
  • BUT WE WILL RECALL...

19
Categories of Research Reasoning Inductive
Reasoning
  • General statements (theories) have to be based on
    empirical observations, which are subsequently
    generalized into statements which can either be
    regarded as true or probably true.
  • The classical example goes from a series of
    observations
  • Swan no. 1 was white,
  • Swan no. 2 was white,
  • Swan no. 3 was white,
  • to the general statement All swans are white.
  • Proof by Induction

20
Research Paradigms
John W. Creswell, Research Methods, Chapter 1,
pages 5-11.
21
Research Paradigms
  • Before a researcher starts to develop an
    experiment they must first make a declaration and
    indicate what their philosophical views are on
    the nature and purpose and research.
  • Different researchers even within the same
    discipline have very distinct views what the
    point of doing research is, and how to interpret
    the results of an experiment, so they have to be
    up front about their views.

22
Research Paradigms
  • There are various terms to describe these
    differences in views, including
  • Paradigm
  • Worldview
  • Epistemologies and ontologies
  • Broadly conceived research methodologies
  • Since weve already looked at Kuhns work, well
    stick with the term paradigm.

23
Research Paradigms
  • The four main paradigms we will consider for this
    class are
  • Postpositivism
  • Social Constructivism
  • Advocacy and Participatory
  • Pragmatism

24
Postpositivism
25
  • Karl Popper
  • Born 28 July 1902
  • Died 17 September 1994
  • Born in Vienna, Austria
  • Philosopher and a professor at the London School
    of Economics

26
Postpositivism
  • This is closest to the traditional scientific
    method.
  • Specifically as viewed by Karl Popper.
  • You can use experiments to measure and analyse
    how the objective world around us works, but the
    results are subject to considerations.

27
Postpositivism
  • If the positivists believe that using science we
    can measure, classify and understand, then the
    postpositivists suggest that this is true to a
    certain extent, but that we must be carful not to
    forget that a lot of our interpretation may be
    based on assumptions and conjectures, and that we
    need to be aware of this.
  • This approach focuses on the quantitative
    descriptors.

28
Postpositivism
  • Postpositivists focus on cause and effect and are
    thus deterministic.
  • So they focus of finding the causes that could
    have produces the specific outcomes of an
    experiment
  • They also have a reductionistic view in the sense
    that they want to reduce the causes to into a
    small, discrete set of ideas to test.

29
Postpositivism
  • The postpositivists inherently believe that there
    are laws and theories that govern the world and
    that they can be identified and tested using the
    scientific method.
  • So the postpositivist starts with a theory,
    collects data and this either supports or refutes
    the theory, which may then result in the theory
    being revised before additional tests are made.

30
Social Constructivism
31
  • Karl Mannheim
  • Born March 27, 1893
  • Died January 9, 1947
  • Born in Budapest, Hungary
  • Sociologist who was one of the founding fathers
    of classical sociology.

32
Social Constructivism
  • This view is typically seen in qualitative
    research
  • The key assumption is that individuals seek
    understanding of the world the live and work in
  • This view comes from the work of Karl Mannheim
    and others.

33
Social Constructivism
  • These individuals develop subjective meanings of
    their experiences meanings directed towards
    certain objects and things.
  • These meanings are varied and multiple, which
    leads the researcher to look at a range of views
    rather than reducing things down to a few
    categories.
  • This approach focuses on the qualitative
    descriptors.

34
Social Constructivism
  • Thus the researchers main goals is to allow the
    participants to construct their own meaning of
    the situation, often negotiated socially and
    historically.
  • The social element means that meanings are
    constructed through interaction with others.
  • The researcher also acknowledges that they
    themselves are shaped by their backgrounds and
    their interpretation flows from their personal,
    cultural and historical experiences.

35
Social Constructivism
  • The more open-ended the questioning is, the
    better.
  • The researcher listens carefully to what the
    participants do in their life settings.
  • The research process is qualitative and largely
    inductive.
  • The objective is to interpret others meanings of
    the world, rather than to start out with a theory
    (as in postpositivism).

36
Advocacy and Participatory
37
  • Jürgen Habermas
  • Born June 18, 1929
  • Age 81
  • Born in Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Sociologist and philosopher. He is best known for
    his theory on the concepts of 'communicative
    rationality' and the 'public sphere'.

38
Advocacy and Participatory
  • This position highlights the view that imposed
    structural laws and theories does not take
    account of marginalised individuals in society or
    issues of social justice that need to be
    addressed.
  • Draws on the works of Jürgen Habermas, as well as
    Karl Marx, Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, and
    Paulo Freire.

39
Advocacy and Participatory
  • Advocates of this perspective feel that the
    constructivist view does not go far enough in
    terms of advocating an action agenda for the
    marginalised.
  • Research needs to be tied in with politics and a
    political agenda. It should also create an action
    agenda for reform.
  • The researchers begins with a social issue of the
    day as the focal point of the study.

40
Advocacy and Participatory
  • The researcher must proceed collaboratively so as
    not to further marginalise participants.
  • In this way the participants may help design
    questions, collect data, analyze information, and
    reap the rewards of the research.
  • This approach creates a united voice for reform
    and change.
  • It is often recursive or dialectical and focuses
    on bringing about change that is emancipatory.

41
Advocacy and Participatory
  • This type of research focuses on the needs of
    groups in society that are marginalised
  • The research will be analysed using a specific
    theoretical perspective (or theoretical lens)
    such as feminist perspectives, racialised
    discourses, critical theory, queer theory, and
    disability theory.

42
Pragmatism
43
  • Charles Sanders Peirce
  • Born September 10, 1839
  • Died April 19, 1914
  • Born in Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Philosopher, logician, mathematician, and
    scientist. He is known for his contributions to
    logic, mathematics, philosophy, and semiotics,
    and as the father of pragmatism.

44
Pragmatism
  • A view that arises out of action, situations, and
    consequences.
  • The key focus is what works, and getting
    solutions to problems.
  • Derives from the work of Peirce, as well as
    William James, George Mead, and John Dewey.

45
Pragmatism
  • Instead of focussing on methods, the researcher
    focuses on the problem and uses a range of
    approaches that help understand it.
  • It is used often with mixed methods research.
  • In this way researchers are free to choose the
    methods, the techniques, and the procedures of
    research that best meet their needs and purpose.

46
Pragmatism
  • The researcher proceeds from the basic premise
    that the human capability of theorizing is
    integral to intelligent practice.
  • Theory and practice are not separate spheres
    rather, theories and distinctions are tools or
    maps for finding our way in the world.
  • As John Dewey put it, there is no question of
    theory versus practice but rather of intelligent
    practice versus uninformed, stupid practice.

47
Pragmatism
  • The researcher does not have to focus on an
    absolute unity, there are many ways to collect
    data and analyse it.
  • The truth is what works at the time, not based
    on the duality between independent reality and
    what is in the mind.
  • So researchers should stop wondering about the
    nature or reality and get on with what works.

48
Summary
Postpositive Social Constructivism Advocacy and Participatory Pragmatism
Reality View Singular reality Multiple realities Political reality Single or Multiple realities
Research Distance and impartiality Sympathetic and close Collaboration Practical
Values Unbiased Biased Biased and negotiated Multiple stances
Process Deductive Inductive Participatory Combining
Language Formal Informal Advocating change Formal or informal
49
Research Methods
  • Planning your research

50
Planning your research Key questions
  • What do you want to know?
  • How do you find out what you want to know?
  • Where can you get the information?
  • Who do you need to ask?
  • When does your research need to be done?
  • Why? (Getting the answer)

51
"I Keep Six Honest Serving Men ..."
  • I keep six honest serving-men(They taught me all
    I knew)Their names are What and Why and When
    And How and Where and Who.I send them over land
    and sea,I send them east and westBut after
    they have worked for me,I give them all a rest.
  • I let them rest from nine till five,For I am
    busy then,As well as breakfast, lunch, and
    tea,For they are hungry men.But different folk
    have different views I know a person small-She
    keeps ten million serving-men,Who get no rest at
    all!
  • She sends'em abroad on her own affairs,From the
    second she opens her eyes-One million Hows, two
    million Wheres,And seven million Whys!

- Rudyard Kipling
52
Six Honest Serving Men
  • What?
  • How?
  • Where?
  • Who?
  • When?
  • Why?

53
Six Honest Serving Men
  • What?
  • How?
  • Where?
  • Who?
  • When?
  • Why?

54
Step 1 What?
  • PLANNING YOUR RESEARCH
  • What do I want to know?
  • When developing your research question, keep in
    mind
  • Who your research is for
  • What decisions your research will inform
  • What kind of information is needed to inform
    those
  • decisions.
  • Conduct a local information scan
  • Take another look at your research question

55
Step 2 How? Where? Who?
  • PLANNING YOUR RESEARCH
  • How do I find out what I want to know?
  • Where can I get the information I need?
  • Who do I need to ask?
  • Choose your methodology
  • quantitative or numbers information
  • qualitative in-depth explanatory information
  • case studies
  • site visits or observation
  • participatory research

56
Step 3 When?
  • PLANNING YOUR RESEARCH
  • When do all the different parts of the research
    need to be done?
  • List all your research work areas
  • Map them against a timeline
  • Develop a work plan

57
Step 4 Why?
  • GETTING THE ANSWER
  • Collect your data
  • Keep returning to your research question
  • Organize your research results to answer the
    question
  • Keep in mind who you are doing the research for
  • Focus on what research results do tell you
  • Be creative, methodical and meticulous
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com