Electoral College - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Electoral College

Description:

Times Helvetica Monotype Sorts Book Antiqua untitled 5 Electoral College Electoral College Presidential Elections Electoral College Electoral College ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: susanma
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Electoral College


1
Electoral College
  • Compromise solution at Constitutional Convention
  • Founders didnt trust Congress (Parliamentary)
  • Founders didnt trust the people (demos mob)
  • Kept states involved in Presidential election
    (each state legislature decides how electors are
    chosen)
  • Electors were intended to be independent thinkers

2
Electoral College
  • Jefferson formed Republican party in 1796 to
    secure vote in Electoral College
  • Number of electors equal to each states
    Representatives 2 Senators
  • 12th Amendment required President Vice
    President to run as team
  • 23rd Amendment allowed D.C. to be represented in
    Electoral College with 3 electors

3
Presidential Elections
  • Popular vote is for electors, not president, even
    though Presidents name appears on ballot
  • Popular vote may differ from vote in Electoral
    College (e.g. Jackson in 1820, Gore in 2000)
  • 48 states send electors with commitment to
    popular will of statewide vote (general-ticket
    system)
  • 2 states (Maine, Nebraska) commit electors to
    vote of Congressional district (similar to
    proportional representation--state may be split)

4
Electoral College
  • Mathematical advantage either to very large or
    very small states
  • Possible to win with 13 states
  • CA(54), NY(33), TX(32), FL(25), PA(23), IL(22),
    OH(21), MI(18), VA(13), GA(13), IN(12), TN(11),
    WI(11), MO(11), WA(11)
  • Possible to win with small states (e.g. George W.
    Bush) because small states are guaranteed 3
    electors
  • In 2000, Gore won CA with 54 electors and 5.7
    million votes Bush won 13 of 19 smallest states
    with 54 electors but only 2.7 million votes

5
Electoral College
  • Once party conventions meet, nominees have ten to
    fifteen weeks to persuade voters before November
    election
  • Emphasis is on securing 270 Electoral College
    votes (triage strategy with limited time and
    money)
  • Ignore states that one is guaranteed to win
  • Ignore states one is guaranteed to lose
  • Ignore states with few electors
  • Focus on swing states and states with many
    electors
  • Exceptions
  • As race got close, Gore pressured Bush in Florida
  • Bush pressured Gore in Tennessee and won

6
Electoral College
  • Critics charge that Electoral College system
    violates political equality principle (one
    person, one vote)
  • 30 million people in California control only 54
    electoral votes
  • Several reform proposals but only direct popular
    election would address issue of political
    equality
  • Electoral College proponents argue that system
    supports outcome in close popular elections when
    candidate receives only plurality of popular vote
    but clear majority in Electoral College (e.g.
    Clinton in 1992) -- enhances legitimacy
  • It also gives power to states and idea of
    federalism

7
Political Campaigns
  • Influenced by
  • office being sought
  • status of candidate (incumbent or challenger)
  • party affiliation and district preference
  • demographics, SES, character size of district
  • financing independent resources

8
Political Campaigns continued
  • Strategies directed at persuading voters based
    on
  • party loyalty
  • position on issues
  • character or image of candidate
  • Tactics focus on
  • message content (negative, comparative)
  • mode of delivery (debate, qa, etc.)

9
Federal Election Campaign Act
  • Passed in 1971 but Nixon spent 65M in 1972 to
    get re-elected some went to jail
  • If raise 5K (lt250 each) in 20 states, then
    government matches up to 1/2 spending limit
  • Spending limit now
  • 30.9M 6.2M 37.1M in primary
  • 61.8M in main election (if Democrat or
    Republican less for minor parties that received
    less than 25 popular vote in previous election)
  • party can receive 12.4M for conventions

10
Congressional Elections
  • Influenced by Congressional district demographics
  • state legislatures determine districts
  • Supreme Court has changed position on racial
    redistricting
  • Also influenced by
  • first-past-the-post process
  • voter preference for divided (weak) govt.
  • Favors pluralist model of democracy

11
Congressional Elections
  • Political equality and Congressional districts
  • Constitution requires decennial census in order
    to calculate number of representatives
  • In 1790, 105 representatives in House (1 for
    every 33,000 people--constitution stipulates no
    fewer than 30,000)
  • In 1910, House of Representatives had 435 members
    (roughly 1 for every 200,000 people)
  • In 1990, 1 House member represented 620,000
    people (if evenly divided--or 647,000 after 2000)

12
Congressional Elections
  • Reapportionment redistributes 435 House members
    among 50 states
  • Redistricting changes boundaries of Congressional
    districts within states
  • Single member district system allows
    winner-take-all format (not multi-member
    districts)
  • Since Baker v. Carr (1962), U.S. Supreme Court
    requires districts of relatively equal size to
    ensure equal protection of the law (14th
    Amendment) or one person, one vote

13
Congressional Elections
  • State legislatures are responsible for
    redistricting
  • Political gerrymandering is acceptable
  • Racial gerrymandering has been overturned by the
    U.S. Supreme Court
  • Uncomfortable resemblance to political
    apartheid..
  • Obligation is to represent constituency as a
    whole, not members of one race
  • Antithetical to system of representative democracy

14
Financing Congressional Campaigns
  • U.S. Supreme Court overturned spending limits in
    Congressional campaigns in Buckley v. Valeo
    (1976)...money is speech
  • Upheld limits on contributions--same as in
    presidential campaigns (1K individual, 5k PACs)
  • Independent (nonaffiliated) PACs have no limit
  • Finance rules favor incumbents, although some
    PACs hedge bets and contribute to both
  • Rules decrease accountability competition, and
    limit access by individuals
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com