Title: Electoral College
1Electoral College
- Why did we do this?
- Why do we still have it?
- What political interests are preserved via
Electoral College - So, you want to be an Elector?
2Electoral College
- What is it
- Constitutional compromise
- Indirect election of President
- Electing a group of people to select Head of
Government
3Electoral College
- Brief History
- 1789, no such thing as national elections
- Few people with national visibility
- No national media / communication
- Impossible to conduct national campaign
- No party system
- many potential candidates
4Electoral College
- History
- 1789, not clear what the role of the President
would be - An extension of Congress
- A Prime Minister
- No Big Deal, and they knew GW would be it
- Solution
- Each states legislature pick group of people to
decide who to support
5Electoral College
- Founders solution
- Article 2.1
- each state shall appoint, in a Manner as the
Legislature therof may direct, an Number of
Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators
and Representatives - Meet in their state, cast votes for two people,
send votes to US Senate
6Electoral College
- Founders solution
- Person with most votes is President, person with
2nd most votes is VP - If a tie, Congress decides
- Didnt think that President and Vice President
might be enemies
7Electoral College
- Early Problems
- States didnt know what to do
- How appoint electors?
- 1789
- New Yorks legislature couldnt agree
- States didnt know how to keep VP candidate
(Adams) from having as many votes as Washington
8Electoral College
- History / Problems
- 1789 method of Elector selection
- 5 states used legislature to appoint (NY)
- MA appointed some by legislature, some by
legislature from list of top 2 candidates in each
Cong. district - NH 5 electors selected by voters statewide
- VA 10 electors selected by voters in districts
- 1789, 1792 unanimous elections
9Electoral College
- 1789 Election
- G Washington (VA) 69
- J. Adams (MA) 34
- J. Jay (NY) 9
- R Harrison (MD) 6
- J Rutledge (SC) 6
- Other 14
- No voting 24
10Electoral College
- Problems
- 1789 - 1800
- 6 of 12 states selected by popular vote
- states often split EC delegation
- Selection in 1789, 1796, 1800 not winner-take-all
- What might this cause?
11Electoral College
- 1796 First real contest
- 4 well known candidates
- Adams (Fed), Pinckney (Fed), Jefferson (DR), Burr
(DR) - weak concept of running mate
- If top 2 tied, goes to Congress
12Electoral College
- 1796 Results (138 voters, 70 to win )
- Adams (F) 35,726 (53) 71 EC votes
- Jefferson (DR) 31,115 (47) 69 EC votes
- Pinckney (F) 59 EC votes
- Burr (DR) 30 EC votes
- S Adams (F Brewer, Patriot) 15 EC votes
- Hamilton wanted Pinckney, got some SC Electors to
vote Jefferson / Pinkney
13Electoral College
- 1796
- Adams (F) / Pinckney (F) 45 - 49
- Jefferson (D) / Burr (D) 25 - 30
- Jefferson (D) / S. Adams (D) 14 - 15
- Adams (F) / Ellsworth (F) 11 - 0
- Jefferson (D) / Pinckney (F) 9 - 14
- Jefferson (D) / Clinton (D) 6 - 7
- Adams (F) / Jay (F) 5 - 0
- Adams (F) / Jefferson (D) 1 - 6
14Electoral College
- Coordination problem
- EC set up before parties emerged
- how insure Pres VP dont hate each other
- Adams (F) Jefferson (DR) would be like
- President Obama Vice President Palin
15Electoral College
- 1800
- an accidental tie
- Result
- Jefferson (DR) 41,330 (61) 73 EC
- Burr (DR) 73 EC
- Adams (F) 25,952 (39) 65 EC
- Pinckney (F) 64 EC
- Jay (F) 1 EC
16Electoral College
- 1800
- Jefferson was supposed to be Dems top choice,
Burr 2 - Tie goes to House of Reps
- Lame Duck Federalists controlled House
- 16 state delegations, each w/ 1 vote
- need majority (9 votes)
17Electoral College
- 1800
- For one week, over 35 ballots, Jefferson got just
8 votes - Hamilton told Federalists Jefferson less worse
than Burr - Federalists switch on 36th Ballot, Jefferson wins
18Electoral College
- 1804
- Burr runs for Governor of NY
- Hamilton smears Burr
- Burr gets even
- Shoots Hamilton
- Hamilton dead
- Burr tries to steal TX from Spain
- Filibuster (look it up)
- Jefferson has him arrested for treason
- Retired to England friends w/ Jeremy Bentham
19Electoral College
- 1804 - Burrs Other Legacy
- 12th Amendment
- Electors cast one vote for President
- Separate vote for Vice President
- Still up to Congress to break ties
20Electoral College
- Developments since 1800s
- Popular voting in states more common post 1830
- National political parties
- Move toward winner take all rules in many
states - only 2 states left that divide up Electors (NE,
ME)
21Electoral College
- Poor Record?
- 4 times popular vote winner different than
Electoral College - 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000
- twice (1824, 1876) Congress has had to select
President - 11 of 35 elections had no popular vote majority
winner
22Electoral College
- Current Issues
- Deadlines
- Apportionment
- Faithless electors
- Election failures
23Electoral College
- How it works today
- need 270 Electors to win
- state delegation number of members of Congress
- Each candidate files a slate of trusted electors
w/ Secretary of State - Electors pledged to support their candidate
24Electoral College
- How it works today
- States decide how many electors each candidate
gets based on popular vote - nearly all states winner take all
- Federal Law Deadlines
- Electors meet at Capitol, December 13th
- Deadline for National Archives December 22nd
- Congress certifies election January 6th
25Electoral College
- Deadlines
- created massive problem in 2000
- Florida recount, lawsuits taking weeks
- December 13 deadline looming
- Major factor forcing US Supreme Court to
intervene - options push back inauguration or certification
dates?
26Electoral College
- Apportionment
- Not by population
- Senate seats skew influence of smallest states
- One EC vote in WY 165,000 people
- One EC vote in ND 245,000 people
- One EC vote in NY, CA 613,000 people
27Electoral College
- Apportionment
- 20 smallest states have 28.7m people
- they get 84 EC votes (44 if by population)
- NY NJ 28m people
- they get 48 EC votes
- CA 34m people
- it gets 55 EC votes
28Electoral College
- Apportionment
- A structural Republican advantage?
- What are the politics of smallest states?
- Bush beat Gore by 13 in smallest states
- GW Bush won 61 of 84 small state electors in 2000
29Electoral College
- Apportionment
- if allocated by population, GOP candidates win 20
fewer EC votes 2000 2004 - or, GOP candidates start w/ a built-in /-20 EC
vote head start given political geography
30Electoral College, 2008
- WY GOP
- VT DEM
- AK GOP
- ND GOP
- SD GOP
- DE DEM
- MT GOP
- RI DEM
- HI DEM
- NH DEM
- ME DEM
- ID GOP
- NE GOP (1 D)
- WV GOP
- NM DEM
- NV DEM
- UT GOP
- AR GOP
- KS GOP
- MS GOP
31Electoral College
- Apportionment
- What are the reasons for over-representing small
states in the EC - Today, what purpose is served?
32Electoral College
- Faithless Electors
- might be the least of our worries
- rare, typically protest votes
- can this be regulated?
33Electoral College
- Election Failures
- What is the point of popular vote for a national
office - aggregate national opinion, produce outcome
34Electoral College
- Election Failure
- EC not good at producing a winner with majority
popular support - Manufactured majorities
- EC good at translating narrow popular vote wins
into clear EC majorities - Reagan 1980 Clintons 43 in 1992
35Electoral College
- Attempts at Reform
- Constitutional Amendments
- after 1948, award electors proportionate to
popular vote in state - 64 Y in Senate, died in House
- after 1968, Direct Election of President
- 338 votes in House, 51 in Senate
36Electoral College
- Recent Reform Proposals
- Colorado 2004
- PR allocation inside state
- why is this a dumb idea?
- California 2007
- winner-take-all by congressional district
- just as dumb?
372000 Pop EC vote by CD by
PR Gore 48.4 266 (49 ) 251 257
Bush 47.9 270 (51 ) 287 258 Nader 2.7
20 others 1.0 3 1996
Clinton 49.2 379 (70 ) 345 262 Dole 40.7 159
(30 ) 193 220 Perot 8.4 49 others
1.7 7 1992 Clinton 43.0 370
(69) 324 232 Bush 37.5 168 (31
) 214 203 Perot 18.9 102 1980
Reagan 50.7 489 (91 ) 396 273 Carter 41.0
49 (9 ) 142 221 Anderson 6.6 35
others 1.9 9 BOLD MAJORITY
381976 Pop EC vote by CD by PR
Carter 50.1 297 (55 ) 269 270 Ford 48.0 240
(45 ) 269 258 others 1.8 10 1968
Nixon 43.2 301 (56 ) 289 231 Humphr
42.7 191 (35 ) 192 225 Wallace 13.5 46 (8
) 57 79 others 0.6 2 1960
Kennedy 49.8 303 (56 ) 278 266
Nixon 49.5 219 (41) 245 266 unaffil. 0.7
15 (3 ) 14 5 BOLD MAJORITY
Be careful what you wish for.....some reforms
make things worse
39Electoral College
- Current Reform Proposals
- Motivated by difficulty of amending US
Constitution - direct election obvious reform, but hardest to
achive - State by state only other option
40Electoral College
- Reform
- National Popular Vote Compact
- States by state agreement to award state EC votes
to national pop. vote winner - Did passed WA House, 22 state chambers have
approved