Stefano Mancini - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Stefano Mancini

Description:

QKD in infinite dimensional Hilbert space can make use of both coherent and entangled states Development of deterministic protocol in infinite dimensional Hilbert ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Bow585
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stefano Mancini


1
The adventures of Alice, Bob Eve in the
Quantumland
  • Stefano Mancini

University of Camerino, Italy
2
Outline (part 3)
  • From probabilistic to deterministic quantum
    cryptography
  • From qubit to qudit up to cv
  • Quantum Secret Sharing
  • Beyond QKD Quantum bit commitment
  • Conclusion

3
A general framework for deterministic
communication
Two way quantum channel Encoding by quantum
operation (Alice can encode without knowing the
state!)
Alphabetsstates
Encoding
Alice
Decoding
4
  • Information relies on OPERATIONS upon the state
    rather than on the STATE itself. This entails Eve
    must perturb the quantum channel twice instead of
    once to gain information
  • The protocol, for suitable alphabets states and
    encoding/decoding operations, is DETERMINISTIC.
    This feature also allows DIRECT COMMUNICATION.
  • How can Alice and Bob detect Eve? Use of two
    modes MESSAGE MODE and CONTROL MODE
  • Possible use of non-orthogonal or entangled
    alphabets states

5
A qubit protocol
(M. Lucamarini S. M. PRL 2005)
Simple intercept-resend eavesdropping
probability of detecting Eve (d) is (03/4)/2 vs
(01/2)/2 of BB84 !
6
Quantum Direct Communication
Number of message bits per protocol run 1-c Eve
wants to eavesdrop one message transfer without
being detected probability p(1-c)c(1-d)(1-c)
c2(1-d)2(1-c) Terms correspond to Eve having
survived 0,1,2 controls before she gets h(d)
bits of information After n successful attacks
Eve gains nh(d) bits and survive with probability
pn Probability to successfully eavesdrop nh(d)
bits Protocol asymptotically secure!
7
Eavesdropping success probability vs maximal
eavesdropping information
8
Eavesdropping in KD (individual incoherent
attack)
Distinguish between orthogonal
subspacesDistinguish between nonorthogonal
states
9
Lemma Optimal Eves incoherent attack consists
in a balanced one for which xx
10
Security conditions
dlt0.23 required vs dlt0.15 of BB84
11
Eavesdropping in KD (individual coherent attack)
12
Security conditions
dlt0.18 required vs dlt0.15 of BB84
13
Efficiency
Theoretical Efficiency Eub/(tqtb) E1-c BB84
E1/6 Practical Efficiency E accounts for
losses EEP2 BB84 EEP (P being the
probability to safely transmit a qubit over
Alice-Bob distance) For Pgt1/(6(1-c)) the scheme
surpasses BB84
14
What is about entanglement ?
  • Bob uses a home qubit and a travel qubit in
    one of the Bells states
  • Alice encodes by performing I,iY on travel
    qubit
  • Bob decodes by performing Bells basis
    measurement
  • Analogy with DENSE CODING !
  • EQUIVALENCE with previous protocol (like BB84
    E91)

15
From qubit to qudit up to cv
  • Higher rates for QKD can be achieved by using
    larger alphabets (Hilbert spaces)
  • Extension of BB84 to qudit (use MUB)
  • Extension of E91 to qudit (generalized Bell
    ineq.)
  • QKD in infinite dimensional Hilbert space can
    make use of both coherent and entangled states
  • Development of deterministic protocol in infinite
    dimensional Hilbert space - multi way quantum
    communication (S. Pirandola, S. M. S. Lloyd
    2006)

16
Quantum Secret Sharing
17
GHZ States and Secret Sharing
18
(No Transcript)
19
The security proof
20
(No Transcript)
21
Beyond QKD ?
  • In a two-party computation Alice (Bob) has a
    private input x (y) and would like to help Bob to
    compute a prescribed function f(x,y) without
    revealing x.
  • Bit commitment is a primitive for implementing
    secure computations.
  • What is bit commitment ?

22
Procedure of quantum bit commitment
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Information theoretic approach to QT
  • Quantum theory can be viewed not as a
    mechanical theory of waves and particles but as a
    theory about the possibilities and
    impossibilities of information transfer
  • The impossibility of superluminal information
    transfer
  • The impossibility of perfectly broadcasting
    information contained in an unknown state (no
    cloning)
  • The impossibility of unconditionally secure bit
    commitment

26
the final questions
  • What is the exact boundary of quantum
    cryptography and why is there ?
  • How would governments regulate quantum
    cryptography ?

27
A Short Bibliography
  • S. Singh, The Code Book (Anchor Book, 1999)
  • H. K. Lo, Quantum Cryptology (in Introduction to
    Quantum Computation Information, World
    Scientific, 1998)
  • S. Lomonaco, How Alice outwits Eve (in Lecture
    Notes in Computer Science, Springer 1999)
  • N. Gisin et al., RMP 2002
  • A. Galindo M. Martin-Delgado, RMP 2002

Further information and research at UniCam see
http//fisica.unicam.it/stefano.mancinior
contact me at stefano.mancini_at_unicam.it
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com