Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing

Description:

Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing HCAT Program Review Cocoa Beach, Fl December 2000 Sequence 1 - Make sure that HVOF does not cause embrittlement ASTM F-519, Type 1a.2 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:819
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: KeithL154
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing


1
Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing
  • HCAT Program Review
  • Cocoa Beach, Fl
  • December 2000

2
Sequence 1 - Make sure that HVOFdoes not cause
embrittlement
Coat, no grind
  • ASTM F-519, Type 1a.2
  • 75 NTS
  • All experience shows HVOF does not cause
    embrittlement
  • Just makes sure

3
Sequence 2 - can H from other plating or
stripping escape through HVOF?
1. Bright Cd plate
2. Strip center - no bake
H2 fill
3. Coat within 4 hrs, no grind
Does H2 escape?
  • 75 NTS
  • Using bright Cd so as to avoid excessive diameter
    and inability to hold in grips
  • No way for H to escape at center except through
    HVOF

4
Sequence 3 - How does environmental embrittlement
compare with Cr?
Coat
Expose small area in notch
expose
  • 45 NTS
  • Solutions - H2O and 5 NaCl
  • Exposed notch should corrode and release H

5
Exposure of bare surface for Sequence 3
  • Exposure of notch - 90? sector
  • CNC machine using rounded edge blade (RBK,
    Seattle)

Blade
Sample
6
Hydrogen embrittlement
  • Samples produced by Southwest Aeroservice (Jim
    Nuse, Dave Sommerville)
  • Sequences 1 and 2 work by Metcut (Phil Bretz)
  • Sequence 3 by Boeing (Dennis Dull)

7
Base material
  • Expected NTS 260 ksi
  • Tested at 362,416 to 382,521, average 373,600
    ksi
  • Sequence 1 and 2 testing at 280.2 ksi
  • Rockwell hardness

8
Coating deposition
  • Chrome penetrates into notch
  • thinner at notch bottom
  • HVOF deposits best by angling gun and blowing
    excess powder away with strong jet
  • thicker at bottom

Chrome
HVOF 31?
9
Embrittlement - summary
  • Table shows hours to failure (passgt200)
  • Sequence 1
  • Col 3 currently under test
  • originals not baked
  • Sequence 2
  • Uncoated samples currently under test - no
    baseline yet
  • originals not H-loaded
  • Sequence 3 testing begun - uncoated baseline in
    test
  • Blue samples at Boeing for metallography

10
Embrittlement - Sequence 1, not baked
  • Sequence 1
  • Unbaked Seq 1 show HVOF does not cause
    embrittlement
  • Baked baseline (0.003 and 0.010 Cr only)
    currently under test
  • Two Cr samples at Boeing for metallography to
    check failure mode

11
Embrittlement - Sequence 2, not baked
  • No immediate failures
  • Need to acquire uncoated baseline
  • Baking removes most H2
  • Not completely removed in WC-Co
  • One immediate failure WC-CoCr 0.010
  • Being analyzed at Boeing

12
Embrittlement - Conclusions
  • Sequence 1
  • HVOF does not cause embrittlement
  • Baked chrome baseline being acquired
  • Sequence 3
  • In progress
  • Sequence 2
  • Failure not immediate without bake
  • Need baseline comparison
  • Some H2 removal by flame?
  • Reduced Kt?
  • Bake removes H2 from most samples
  • Except WC-Co 0.003 - why?
  • Immediate fail WC-Co 0.010 being examined at
    Boeing
  • Baseline uncoated (i.e. coated and stripped)
    being acquired
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com