Measurement of Physical Functioning in National HESs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Measurement of Physical Functioning in National HESs

Description:

Measurement of Physical Functioning in National HESs. Workshop ... Hydraulic dynamometer. Position of the participant. Recommendation of American Hand Therapist ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: srau
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measurement of Physical Functioning in National HESs


1
Measurement of Physical Functioning in National
HESs
  • Workshop on Health Examination Surveys
  • Luxembourg 10th April 2008
  • Sanna Natunen
  • Recommendations on Measurement of Physical
    Functioning
  • Natunen S., Viet L., Verscuren M.

2
Content
  • Why to measure
  • How to measure
  • 1. Grip strength
  • 2. Walking speed
  • 3. Standing balance
  • 4. Single-leg stand
  • 5. Timed chair stand
  • Open questions

3
Why to measure
  • Demographic changes Aging population
  • Used extensively in population studies/surveys
  • NHANES
  • Health Surveys for England
  • Mini-Finland, Health 2000-surveys etc.
  • Add valuable information over self report
  • Predict subsequent disability, need of
    assistance, falls, nursing home admission and
    mortality ? e.g. targeting the interventions
    /prevention initiatives

4
How to measure
  • No international standards / recommendations
  • FEHES review on measurement of physical
    functioning
  • Used methods in previous HES
  • Feasibility with in general health surveys
  • Valid and reliable methods
  • Administrable in different settings
    (home/clinics)
  • Not expensive equipments
  • Not extensive training
  • Not time consuming

5
Why to measure
  • Theoretical advantages and disadvantages of
  • performance versus self-report measures of
    physical functioning
  • _________________________________________________
    ___________________________________
  • Advantages
  • _________________________________________________
    ______________________
  • Face validity clear for task being performed
  • Better reproducibility
  • Greater sensitivity to change
  • Usual activity vs. maximal capacity
  • Influenced less by poor cognitive functioning
  • Influenced less by culture, language, and
    education
  • _________________________________________________
    ______________________________
  • Disadvantages
  • _________________________________________________
    ______________________
  • More time consuming
  • Adequate space and special equipment needed
  • Special training of examiners
  • Modifications necessary for home surveys
  • Potential injuries

6
Grip strength
7
Grip strength
8
Grip strength
  • Strength of the dominant hand from 30 years and
    older
  • Selection of the measurement device
  • Hydraulic dynamometer
  • Position of the participant?
  • Recommendation of American Hand Therapist
  • Sitting in a straight-backed chair
  • Shoulders adducted in neutral, elbows flexed at
    90 degrees
  • Procedure
  • Test on the dominant hand
  • Repeat the test three times and record the result
    after each time
  • 3 to 5 minutes to perform

9
Walking speed
10
Walking speed
11
Walking speed
  • Review ? Guralnik et al 1994, Curb et al 2006
  • Measure normal walking speed from all 50 years
    and older
  • Equipment Stopwatch and measurement tape
  • Procedure
  • A distance of 4 meters (Guralnik et al 2000)
  • Normal walking speed
  • The time is recorded to the nearest 0.1 second
  • If any walking aid (cane, walker, etc.) is used
    during the test, this is recorded on the
    collection form
  • 1 minutes to perform

12
Standing Balance
13
(No Transcript)
14
Standing balance
  • No previous international recommendations for
    standardized protocol exist
  • Measure standing balance from 60 years and older
  • Procedure
  • Adapted from Guralnik et al 1994
  • Semi-tandem stand (10s)
  • Side-by-side stand (10s) / Full-tandem stand
    (10s)
  • 5 minutes to perform

15
Unassisted singel leg stand
  • No previous international recommendations for
    standardized protocol exist
  • Measure balance and other domains of functioning
  • 30 years and elderly
  • Protocol
  • One leg standing position for 30 seconds
  • Participant can choose the foot to raise
  • 3 minutes to perform

16
Timed chair stand
17
Chair stand
18
Timed chair stand
  • No previous international recommendations for
    standardized protocol exist
  • For all 30 years and older
  • Equipment
  • Stopwatch
  • Armless chair (height 45 cm) with straight back
  • Procedure
  • Rise from the chair without the help of arms
  • If successful, proceed to the next step of chair
    rises
  • Rise from the chair without the help of arms
    (arms folded across chest), 10 times
  • 2 to 3 minutes to perform

19
Open questions
  • Grip strength
  • Dominant hand / both?
  • Walking speed
  • Normal walking speed / maximal walking speed?
  • Standing balance
  • Some more discriminating test also for highly
    functioning population?
  • Timed chair stand
  • 10 times, but is also time for 5 times rise
    needed?

20
Conclusions
  • Importance and public health relevance
  • Feasible HIS/HES
  • Future development
  • EUNAAPA http//www.eunaapa.org/index.php
  • ALPHA http//www.thealphaproject.eu/
  • PROFANE http//www.profane.eu.org/
  • National networks for example in Finland
    http//www.toimia.fi
  • Other?

21
If you would be told this you might not believe
itBut if you see it you believe it!!!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com