Chapter 3: Ethical Treatment of Research Participants - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 3: Ethical Treatment of Research Participants

Description:

Risks, voluntary participation, informed consent, deception ... Minimize risks (e.g. Milgram, Buss) Ethical objections. It's lying and can have adverse effects ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: tommit5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 3: Ethical Treatment of Research Participants


1
Chapter 3 Ethical Treatmentof Research
Participants
  • Responsibility for ethical research
  • Researcher, IRB
  • Ethical considerations in planning research
  • Risks, voluntary participation, informed consent,
    deception
  • Ethical considerations in data collection
  • Avoid harm, withdrawal of consent
  • Ethical considerations following data collection
  • Alleviating adverse effects, debriefing,
    compensation of control groups, confidentiality
    of data
  • Summary

2
Chap 3 EthicsResponsibility for Ethical Research
  • Primary issues
  • Both researcher and those supervised
  • Harm cf to benefits
  • IRB (Institutional Review Board)
  • How many, who is represented? Who, how many?
  • Scientist
  • Non-scientist
  • Non-affiliated with institutions
  • Criteria and Review Procedures
  • How many criteria? Box 3-1
  • Elements of a research protocol (6) (Review
    procedures)

3
4 Ethical Considerations Planning
  • Risk of harm or deprivation
  • Voluntary participation
  • Informed consent
  • Deception

4
1Risk of harm
  • Categories of risk
  • Physical,
  • psychological stress
  • inconvenience, boredom?
  • Economic?
  • What are some potential risks in your study?
  • Evaluating risks
  • Likelihood (Jacob et al., 91 Zimbardo, 73)
  • severity
  • duration
  • reversibility (Milgram, 74)
  • early detection (Viox?)

5
Risks of Harm cont
  • Deprivation
  • Framingham studyasprin,
  • with-holding drugs from college students?
  • Withdrawing treatment (single subject e.g.
    Anorexia)
  • Benefits of research
  • Psychological (Milgram, 74 Zimbardo, 73)
  • Risk-Benefit analysis
  • Subjective judgment

6
2 Voluntary Participation
  • Covert v. Subtle Coercion.
  • Whats the difference?
  • Have you experienced it?
  • Excessive inducements
  • What it take () for you to donate a kidney?

7
3 Informed Consent
  • Elements
  • Behavioral consent (Sieber, 92)
  • Is this sufficient?
  • Have you given, rejected an offer?
  • Public behavior
  • Have you been observed? (Middlemist et al., 76)
  • Would you have known?
  • Would you have cared?
  • Competence to consent
  • When would it not be necessary?
  • Readability of consent form

8
4 Deception
  • Active v. passive does it matter?
  • Why is it necessary?
  • Internal validity reactivity, control demand
    characteristics
  • Overcome reluctance to give information (e.g.
    bogus pipeline)
  • Allow for manipulation of IV (e.g. confederate
    agrees)
  • To study rare events (e.g. emergencies)
  • Minimize risks (e.g. Milgram, Buss)
  • Ethical objections
  • Its lying and can have adverse effects
  • Are you suspicious? Are non-psych students
    suspicious?

9
Deception cont
  • Alternatives
  • Natural settings (often lack control)
  • Simulation research (e.g. Deutsch Krauss, 60)
  • Passive role playing
  • Janis Mann, smoking cessation
  • To test response to mugging?
  • Consent to deception
  • Would you agree to it?
  • Minimizing harm
  • Use the checklist p 76
  • How harmful is itreally? (Christensen, 88)

10
Ethical Considerations data collection
  • Avoidance of harm
  • Screening for risk factors (how is your ticker?)
  • Unanticipated adverse effects (Milgram
    Zimbardos work)
  • Discovering psychological problems
  • Depression studies
  • I-O testing applicants personality cognitive
    ability
  • Withdrawal of consent
  • Reluctance to withdraw
  • Would you have refused to shock Ss? (Milgram,
    72))
  • Right to withdraw internal validity
  • What to do with perception of control (Singer
    Glass, 75)

11
Ethical ConsiderationsAfter data collection
  • Alleviating adverse effects
  • Debriefing (post experimental interview)
  • Components
  • Education disclose deception asking for Ps
    insight
  • Effective debriefing
  • Can debriefing be harmful?
  • Compensation of control groups
  • Confidentiality of data
  • Protecting confidentiality (cf with anonymity)
  • Data confidentiality and the law (discoverable
    through subpoena
  • DHHS certificate complete anonymity

12
Ethical TreatmentSummary
  • Responsibility for ethical research
  • Researcher, IRB
  • Ethical considerations in planning research
  • Risks, voluntary participation, informed consent,
    deception
  • Ethical considerations in data collection
  • Avoid harm, withdrawal of consent
  • Ethical considerations following data collection
  • Alleviating adverse effects, debriefing,
    compensation of control groups, confidentiality
    of data
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com